A Scheduling Tool for Achieving Zero Defect Manufacturing (ZDM): A Conceptual Framework

  • Foivos PsarommatisEmail author
  • Dimitris Kiritsis
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 536)


Contemporary manufacturing landscape has changed and has become highly volatile and demanding. Product Life Cycle has significantly decreased because of the consumers’ need for personalized products in shorter period of time. This need forced the manufacturers to produce smaller batches of highly diversified products instead of producing huge batches of the same product. These newly imposed production requirements made the manufacturers struggle to optimize their productions in such short period of time and therefore, these production requirements created the need for more efficient, productive and eco-friendly planning and scheduling. The solution to this problem can be given partially by a concept named “Zero Defect Manufacturing” (ZDM). The goal of ZDM is to eliminate defected parts and therefore achieving higher efficiency, eco-friendliness and lower production costs. There are four ZDM strategies that are interconnected with each other: detection, repair, prediction and prevention. The current research work focuses on the Beginning of Life of the product and considers the development of a dynamic Scheduling tool combined with an intelligent Decision Support System (DSS) that takes into consideration the ZDM strategies for eliminating defected parts during production. The elimination of defected parts would be done mainly by creating specific algorithms for predicting when a defect may occur and for taking the right decisions in order to prevent the defect occurrence. Finally, an industrial example is presented in order to illustrate the potential benefits of such an approach.


Zero Defect Manufacturing Defect prediction Scheduling 



The work presented in this paper is partially supported by the project Z-Factor which is funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 program under grant agreement No 723906.


  1. 1.
    Ferretti, S., Caputo, D., Penza, M., D’Addona, D.M.: Monitoring systems for zero defect manufacturing. Proc. CIRP 12, 258–263 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhou, L., Gupta, S.M., Kinoshita, Y., Yamada, T.: Pricing decision models for remanufactured short-life cycle technology products with generation consideration. Proc. CIRP 61, 195–200 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Colledani, M., Coupek, D., Verl, A., Aichele, J., Yemane, A.: Design and evaluation of in-line product repair strategies for defect reduction in the production of electric drives. Proc. CIRP 21, 159–164 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Manupati, V.K., Putnik, G.D., Tiwari, M.K., Ávila, P., Cruz-Cunha, M.M.: Integration of process planning and scheduling using mobile-agent based approach in a networked manufacturing environment. Comput. Ind. Eng. 94, 63–73 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Myklebust, O.: Zero defect manufacturing: a product and plant oriented lifecycle approach. Proc. CIRP 12, 246–251 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferris, M.C., Maravelias, C.T., Sundaramoorthy, A.: Simultaneous batching and scheduling using dynamic decomposition on a grid. INFORMS J. Comput. 21, 398–410 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ouelhadj, D., Petrovic, S.: A survey of dynamic scheduling in manufacturing systems. J. Sched. 12, 417–431 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dios, M., Framinan, J.M.: A review and classification of computer-based manufacturing scheduling tools. Comput. Ind. Eng. 99, 229–249 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Qu, S., Wang, J., Govil, S., Leckie, J.O.: Optimized adaptive scheduling of a manufacturing process system with multi-skill workforce and multiple machine types: an ontology-based, multi-agent reinforcement learning approach. Proc. CIRP 57, 55–60 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vieira, G.E., Herrmann, J.W., Lin, E.: Analytical models to predict the performance of a single-machine system under periodic and event-driven rescheduling strategies. Int. J. Prod. Res. 38, 1899–1915 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, ICT for Sustainable Manufacturing, EPFL SCI-STI-DKLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations