Effective Land-Use and Public Regional Planning in the Mining Industry: The Case of Abruzzo

  • Francesco De Luca
  • Stefania FensoreEmail author
  • Enrica Meschieri
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 805)


Land use patterns are the visible consequences of human intervention on the natural environment, especially with reference to mining activities for direct trade or subsequent manufacturing purposes. But the extractive industry and the activities of its supply chain have divergent interests related to the quantities of materials that can be extracted in compliance with the fundamental parameters of environmental sustainability. This is the main reason why mining activities are generally allowed only if public authorities issue the specific permits consistently with a specific long range plan. As the Italian legislation attributes this planning authority to regional governments, the present work aims to help to describe the socio-economic variables most affected by quarry extraction processes by referring to the case of Abruzzo (region of Central Italy). We also introduce a model for quantification of the quarry material requirements expressed by the economic operators of the same territory with a time horizon of 2020. To this end, we suggest the use of economic and statistical indicators, such as public investment on infrastructures, GDP growth, social housing policies, private building permits, to optimize the predicting power of the model as they represent reliable proxies of the demand of raw materials, in respect to the need to limit the impact on the environment.


Land use Public planning Mining activities Sustainable indicators 


  1. 1.
    Aerts, J.: Spatial decision support for resource allocation. PhD Dissertation, Universiteit van Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Azapagic, A.: Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry. J. Clean. Prod. 12, 639–662 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Nijs, T.C.M., de Niet, R., Crommentuijn, L.: Constructing land-use maps of the Netherlands in 2030. J. Environ. Manag. 72(1–2), 35–42 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ekabten, E.B., Mulongo, L.S., Isaboke, P.O.: Effective land-use strategies for the restoration of Maragoli forest in Vihiga county, Kenya. J. Sci. Res. Stud. 4(11), 293–303 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frenkel, A.: The potential effect of national growth management policy on urban sprawl and the depletion of open spaces and farmland. Land Use Policy 21(4), 357–369 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hilson, G., Murck, B.: Sustainable development in the mining industry: clarifying the corporate perspective. Resour. Policy 26, 227–238 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jenkins, H., Yakovleva, N.: Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. J. Clean. Prod. 14, 271–284 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koomen, E., Rietveld, P., de Nijs, T.: Modelling land-use change for spatial planning support. Ann. Reg. Sci. 42(1), 1–10 (2008). Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lambin, E.F., Turner, B.L., Geist, H.J., Agbola, S.B., Angelsen, A., Bruce, J.W., Coomes, O.T., Dirzo, R., Fischer, G., Folke, C., George, P.S., Homewood, K., Imbernon, J., Leemans, R., Li, X., Moran, E.F., Mortimore, M., Ramakrishnan, P.S., Richards, J.F., Skanes, H., Stone, G.D., Svedin, U., Veldkamp, T.A., Vogel, C., Xu, J.: The causes of land-use and land-cover change, moving beyond the myths. Glob. Environ. Change 11(4), 5–13 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Loonen, W., Heuberger, P., Kuijpers-Linde, M.: Spatial optimisation in land-use allocation problems. Chapter 9. In: Koomen, E., Stillwell, J., Bakema, A., Scholten, H.J. (eds.) Modelling Land-use Change; Progress and Applications, pp. 147–165. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meyer, W.B., Turner II, B.L.: Changes in Land Use and Land Cover: A Global Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Solecki, W.D., Oliveri, C.: Downscaling climate change scenarios in an urban land use change model. J. Environ. Manag. 72, 105–115 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Verburg, P.H., Schot, P.P., Dijst, M.J., Veldkamp, A.: Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities. GeoJournal 61, 309–324 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco De Luca
    • 1
  • Stefania Fensore
    • 2
    Email author
  • Enrica Meschieri
    • 1
  1. 1.DEAUniversity “G. d’Annunzio” of Chieti-PescaraPescaraItaly
  2. 2.DSFPEQUniversity “G. d’Annunzio” of Chieti-PescaraPescaraItaly

Personalised recommendations