Research on the Evaluation of Scientists Based on Weighted h-index
[Purpose/meaning] Solving the problem that h-index and h-type index lack of comprehensive evaluation of scientists’ overall academic contribution. [Method/process] Considering the contribution of scientists’ first h academic papers, this paper proposed two weighted h-index model which are named hw-index and hw_t-index, and then used the data from 30 active Chinese scholars in Library and Information Science field for empirical analysis. [Results/conclusion] Revealing highly cited papers and considering the contribution of scientists’ every paper, hw-index not only weakens the influence of self-citation on the results, but also makes it easy to distinguish scientists’ contributions. The hw_t-index focuses on the scientists’ papers in recent years, and it also considers their past contributions. Therefore, in short term evaluation, the hw_t-index is more reasonable for young scientists who have made a great contribution in the past years. Potential scholars can be identified by the way of comparing hw-index and hw_t-index.
Keywordsh-index Cited frequency hw-index hw_t-index
Publication of this article was funded by National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers 16BTQ071).
- Wu, Q.: The w-index: a measure to access scientific impact by focusing on widely cited papers. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 61(3), 609–614 (2010)Google Scholar
- Sui, G.: Relations among g, h and e indexes and its bibliometrics meaning. J. Libr. Inf. Serv. 57(23), 90–94 (2013)Google Scholar
- Yu, L., Wang, Z.: A perspective of time h index innovatoin: h1_n index and hn index. J. China Soc. Sci. Tech. Inf. 36(04), 346–351 (2017)Google Scholar
- Zhang, X.: hm Index-A modification to h index. J. Libr. Inf. Serv. (10), 116–118+16 (2007)Google Scholar
- Long, Y., Zhao, Q., Zhao, X.: Q-index—A new type of h-index considering time. J. Libr. Inf. Serv. 61(07), 91–95 (2017)Google Scholar
- Lv, N., Liu, Y., Quan, S.: h-index time trends analysis based on author contribution. J. Intell. 34(04), 54–58 (2017)Google Scholar