# Rating Methodology: New Look and New Horizons

## Abstract

In the previous chapter, a new approach to rating methodology has been suggested. Key factors of a new approach were the following: (1) the adequate use of discounting of financial flows virtually not used in existing rating methodologies and (2) the incorporation of rating parameters (financial “ratios”) into the perpetuity limit of modern theory of capital structure [Brusov–Filatova–Orekhova (BFO) theory], for companies with infinite lifetime.

In current chapter, further development of a new approach has been done. We have generalized it for the general case of modern theory of capital structure [Brusov–Filatova–Orekhova (BFO) theory]: for companies of arbitrary age. A serious modification of BFO theory in order to use it in rating procedure has been required. It allows to apply obtained results for real economics, where all companies have finite lifetime, introduce a factor of time into theory, estimate the creditworthiness of companies of arbitrary age (or arbitrary lifetime), introduce discounting of the financial flows, using the correct discount rate, etc. This allows to use the powerful tools of BFO theory in the rating. All these create a new base for rating methodologies.

## Keywords

Rating Rating methodology Discounting of financial flows Brusov–Filatova–Orekhova theory Coverage ratios Leverage ratios## References

- Brusov PN, Filatova ТV (2011) From Modigliani–Miller to general theory of capital cost and capital structure of the company. Finance and Credit 435:2–8Google Scholar
- Brusov P, Filatova T, Orehova N, Brusova A (2011a) Weighted average cost of capital in the theory of Modigliani–Miller, modified for a finite life-time company. Appl Financ Econ 21(11):815–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brusov P, Filatova T, Orehova N et al (2011b) From Modigliani–Miller to general theory of capital cost and capital structure of the company. Res J Econ Bus ICT 2:16–21Google Scholar
- Brusov P, Filatova T, Orehova N et al (2011c) Influence of debt financing on the effectiveness of the investment project within the Modigliani–Miller theory. Res J Econ Bus ICT 2:11–15Google Scholar
- Brusov P, Filatova T, Orekhova N, Brusov P, Brusova A (2012a) Modern approach to dividend policy of company. Finance and credit 18(37):2012Google Scholar
- Brusov P, Filatova T, Eskindarov M, Orehova N (2012b) Influence of debt financing on the effectiveness of the finite duration investment project. Appl Financ Econ 22(13):1043–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brusov P, Filatova T, Eskindarov M, Orehova N (2012c) Hidden global causes of the global financial crisis. J Rev Global Econ 1:106–111Google Scholar
- Brusov P, Filatova P, Orekhova N (2013a) Absence of an optimal capital structure in the famous tradeoff theory! J Rev Global Econ 2:94–116Google Scholar
- Brusov P, Filatova T, Orehova N (2013b) A qualitatively new effect in corporative finance: abnormal dependence of cost of equity of company on leverage. J Rev Global Econ 2:183–193Google Scholar
- Brusov P, Filatova P, Orekhova N (2014a) Mechanism of formation of the company optimal capital structure, different from suggested by trade off theory. Cogent Econ Finance 2:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2014.946150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brusov P, Filatova T, Orehova N (2014b) Inflation in Brusov–Filatova–Orekhova theory and in its perpetuity limit – Modigliani–Miller theory. J Rev Global Econ 3:175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brusov P, Filatova T, Orehova N, Eskindarov M (2015) Modern corporate finance, investment and taxation, 1st edn. Springer International Publishing, Berlin, pp 1–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brusov P, Filatova T, Orehova N, Kulk V, Weil I (2018a) New meaningful effects in modern capital structure theory. J Rev Global Econ 7:104–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brusov P, Filatova T, Orehova N, Kulk V (2018b) A “golden age” of the companies: conditions of its existence. J Rev Global Econ 7:88–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brusov P, Filatova T, Orehova N, Kulk V (2018c) Rating methodology: new look and new horizons. J Rev Global Econ 7:63–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brusov P, Filatova T, Orehova N, Kulk V (2018d) Rating: new approach. J Rev Global Econ 7:37–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brusova A (2011) А Comparison of the three methods of estimation of weighted average cost of capital and equity cost of company. Financ Anal Prob Solut 34(76):36–42Google Scholar
- Filatova Т, Orehova N, Brusova А (2008) Weighted average cost of capital in the theory of Modigliani–Miller, modified for a finite life-time company. Bull FU 48:68–77Google Scholar
- Мodigliani F, Мiller M (1958) The cost of capital, corporate finance, and the theory of investment. Am Econ Rev 48:261–297Google Scholar
- Мodigliani F, Мiller M (1963) Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: a correction. Am Econ Rev 53:147–175Google Scholar
- Modigliani F, Miller M (1966) Some estimates of the cost of capital to the electric utility industry 1954–1957. Am Econ Rev 56:333–391Google Scholar