Talking about severe erectile dysfunction involves dealing with a patient and a partner with a long history of therapeutic attempts and failures. The solution of a penile prosthesis implant, in many countries including Italy, is not a first-line treatment. Often it is a final surgery when other medical treatments, considered less invasive, are completed. In many cases, this caution is rewarding. In others, it represents a step-by-step process that strongly disturbs the balance of couples and individuals.
Penile prosthesis Severe erectile dysfunction Penile implants The therapeutic role of long-term partners Rehabilitation of the penis Role of the psycho-sexologist
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Virag R et al (1981) Vascular impotence: a review of 92 cases with 54 surgeries. Vasc Surg 15:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandaglia G et al (2014) A systemic review of the association between erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular disease. Eur Urol 65:968–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakky TS, Wang R, Henry GD (2014) The evolution of the inflatable penile prosthetic device and surgical innovations with anatomical considerations. Curr Urol Rep 15(6):410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trost L, Hellstrom W (2013) History, contemporary outcomes, and future of penile prostheses: a review of the literature. Sex Med Rev 1:150–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natali A, Olianas R, Fisch M (2008) Penile implantation in Europe: successes and complications with 253 implants in Italy and Germany. J Sex Med 5:1503–1512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eid F, Wilson SK, Cleves M et al (2012) Coated implants and “no touch” surgical technique decreases risk of infection in inflatable penile prosthesis implantation to 0.46%. Urology 79:1310–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettocchi C, Palumbo F, Spilotros M et al (2010) Patient and partner satisfaction after AMS inflatable penile prosthesis implant. J Sex Med 7:304–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akin-Olugbade O, Parker M, Guhring P et al (2006) Determinants of patient satisfaction following penile prosthesis surgery. J Sex Med 3:743–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar