Advertisement

Industry and the Development of a New System of Higher Technological Education in the UK 1955–1965: A Shared Responsibility?

  • John Heywood
Chapter
Part of the Philosophy of Engineering and Technology book series (POET, volume 32)

Abstract

There is a continuing conflict between education and industry that begins with the different perceptions that educators and industrialists have of the purposes of tertiary education through to university study. For example at the present time there is a pressure from industry on the higher education sector to prepare new graduates immediately for work. In so doing industry places the responsibility for education and training on the institutions of higher education and through their fees on the students for their education and training. The purpose of this chapter is to examine the extent to which responsibility was shared between the colleges and industry when England and Wales had a national system of higher technological education and training based on the sandwich principle in the 1950s and 1960s, and to show that industrialists working with educationalists are capable of producing innovatory curricula. Harold Silver the Historian of the Council for National Academic Awards 1964–1989 (A Higher Education (1990) London, Falmer) reports that of the thesis and dissertation literature for the earlier period, that is the period too which this chapter relates there were only two that were relevant, one of which was the authors (p 279). Such research as there was is documented in Heywood, J. and R. Ann Abel (1964) Technical Education and Training in the United Kingdom. Research in Progress 1962–1964. Slough. The National Foundation for Educational Research). If engineering education is to progress practitioners in both academia and industry will require an understanding of the substantial knowledge base that has been developed, which implies some kind of training. Only in this way will they learn to share responsibility at the operational and executive levels of curriculum delivery and planning.

Keywords

Academia Accreditation Assessment Competence Curriculum innovation Industry Industrial training NCTA Percy committee Policy Problem/project based learning Responsibility Sandwich (cooperative) courses Technological education 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This chapter is a development of two papers published by the author at the 2011 and 2014 annual conferences of the American Society for Engineering Education (Heywood 2011, 2014). I thank the Society for permission to reprint extracts from these papers.

References

  1. Barlow. (1946). Scientific manpower. Report of a Committee appointed by the Lord President of the Council.Cmd 6824. London, HMSO. The Barlow Report.Google Scholar
  2. Beaver, H. (1920). Engineering and civilisation. 6th Graham Clark Lecture. Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, 6. 205 ff.Google Scholar
  3. Blandin, B. (2011). The competence of an engineer and how it is built through an apprenticeship program: A tentative model. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(1), 57–71.Google Scholar
  4. Bosworth, G. S. (1963). Towards creative activity in engineering. Universities Quarterly, 17, 286.Google Scholar
  5. Bosworth, G. S. (1966). The education and training requirements for the electrical and mechanical manufacturing industries committee on manpower resources for science and technology. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  6. Cotgrove, S. (1958). Technical education and social change. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  7. EUSEC. (1961). Report on education and training of professional engineers (Vol. 1). London: Institution of Electrical Engineers.Google Scholar
  8. Feilden, G. B. R. (1963). Engineering design. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  9. Ford, N. J., & Rennie, D. M. (1999). Development of an authentic assessment scheme for the professional placement period of a sandwich course. In J. Heywood, J. M. Sharp, & M. Hides (Eds.), Improving teaching in higher education. Salford: University of Salford teaching and learning Qualkity Improvement scheme.Google Scholar
  10. Grinter, L. (1955). Final report on the evaluation of engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 25.Google Scholar
  11. Heward, C., Mash, V., & Heywood, J. (1968). Student reaction to sandwich courses for the Diploma in Technology (Dip.Tech). Bulletin of Mechanical Engineering Education, 7, 253.Google Scholar
  12. Heywood, J. (1969). An evaluation of certain post-war developments in higher education. Thesis. Lancaster, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
  13. Heywood, J. (1970). Qualities and their assessment in the education of technologists. International Bulletin of Mechanical Engineering Education, 9, 15–29.Google Scholar
  14. Heywood, J. (2005). Engineering education. Research and development in curriculum and instruction. Hoboken: NJ IEEE/Wiley Interscience.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heywood, J. (2011). Higher technological education in England and Wales between 1955 and 1966. The contribution of the British electrical engineering industry. Proceedings Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education. Ac 2011-634.Google Scholar
  16. Heywood, J. (2014). Higher technological education and British policy making: A lost opportunity for curriculum change. Proceedings Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education. Paper 8689.Google Scholar
  17. Heywood, J. (2016). More by luck than good judgement: Moral purpose in engineering education policy making for change (pp. 1–6). ASEE/IEEE Proceedings Frontiers in Education Conference.  https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757552.
  18. Heywood, J., Lee, L. S., Monk, J. D., Moon, J., Rowley, B. G. H., Turner, B. T., & Vogler, J. (1966). The education of professional engineers for design and manufacture (a model curriculum). Lancaster Studies in Higher Education, 1, 2–151.Google Scholar
  19. Hutton, S. P., & Gerstl, J. E. (1964). Engineering education and careers. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. 178, Part 3F Proceedings of a symposium on education and careers.Google Scholar
  20. Jahoda, M. (1963). The education of technologists. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  21. JEE. (1964). Journal of Engineering Education, 54, ix.Google Scholar
  22. Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (2014). Cambridge handbook of engineering education research. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Korte, R. F. (2009). How newcomers learn the social norms of an organization: A case study of the socialization of newly hired engineers. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 20(3), 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marris, P. (1964). The experience of higher education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  26. MoE. (1945). Higher technological education, The Percy Report. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  27. MoE. (1956). Technical education (1956), Whitepaper. Cmnd 9703. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  28. MoE. (1959). Report of the central advisory council for education, Crowther Report (pp. 15–18). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  29. MoE. (1961). Better opportunities in technical education, White paper. Cmnd 1524. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  30. Monk, J. D., & Heywood, J. (1977). The education and career patterns of professional mechanical engineers in design and manufacture. The Vocational Aspect of Education, 29(72), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Payne, G. L. (1960). Britain’s scientific and technological manpower. Stanford: Stanford University Press jointly with Oxford U.P in the UK.Google Scholar
  32. Perry, W. B. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.Google Scholar
  33. Pullman, W. A. (1964). Teaching design to sandwich courses students. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 179(1), 100–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rakowski, R. T. (1990). Assessment of student performance during industrial training. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1(20), 106–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rice, R. (1965). A survey of the industrial work period of students of the diploma in technology at a college of advanced technology. The Vocational Aspect of Education, 17, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sandberg, J. (2000). Understanding human competence at work. An interpretive approach. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 9–25.Google Scholar
  37. Skellon, J. H. (1959). Planning of the industrial training period. Journal of the Royal Institute of Chemistry.  https://doi.org/10.1039/519598300202.
  38. Torbert, W. R. (1987). Managing the corporate dream. Homewood: Dow-Jones Irwin.Google Scholar
  39. Trevelyan. (2010). Restructuring engineering from practice. Engineering Studies, 2(3), 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Trevelyan, J. (2014). The making of an expert engineer. London: Taylor and Francis Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Heywood
    • 1
  1. 1.Trinity College DublinDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations