Advertisement

Do We Have What Is Needed to Change Everything?

A Survey of Finnish Software Businesses on Labour Shortage and Its Potential Impacts
  • Sonja M. Hyrynsalmi
  • Minna M. Rantanen
  • Sami HyrynsalmiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 537)

Abstract

The fourth industrial revolution is expected to bring major changes both in society as well as in the modern industry. Naturally, it will also shake the labour market—however, not only by replacing blue collar duties by robots, but also by renewing the set of skills and competencies needed in new kinds of work duties. In this study, we use a data (n = 160) from a survey to the Finnish software businesses to evaluate how software companies perceive the labour shortage and its implications in the verge of the new industrial revolution. The results show that already now there are signs that the labour shortage might harm the growth and innovations in the ICT field. This study presents the results from the survey and discusses whether there are enough competent resources to support the industrial revolution.

Keywords

Fourth industrial revolution Skills Competence Software business 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thanks Managing Director Rasmus Roiha and Finnish Software Industry & Entrepreneurs Association for sharing the dataset used in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Schwab, K.: The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Foreign Affairs (2018). https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2015-12-12/fourth-industrial-revolution. Accessed 23 Jan 2018
  2. 2.
    Hermann, M., Pentek, T., Otto, B.: Design principles for industrie 4.0 scenarios. In: 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 3928–3937 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Katz, L.F., Margo, R.A.: Technical change and the relative demand for skilled labor: The united states in historical perspective. Working Paper 18752, National Bureau of Economic Research (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frey, C.B., Osborne, M.: Technology at Work: The Future of Innovation and Employment. Oxford Martin School and Citi GPS, Oxford (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    OECD: New Markets and New Jobs. Number 255 in OECD Digital Economy Papers. OECD Publishing (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frey, C.B., Osborne, M.A.: The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 114, 254–280 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldin, C., Katz, L.: The Race Between Education and Technology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Autor, D.H., Levy, F., Murnane, R.J.: The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration. Q. J. Econ. 118(4), 1279–1333 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    World Economic Forum: The Future of Jobs: Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for Fourth Industrial Revolution. Global Challenge Insight Report. World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lehner, F., Sundby, M.W.: ICT skills and competencies for SMEs: results from a structured literature analysis on the individual level. In: Harteis, C. (ed.) The Impact of Digitalization in the Workplace. PPL, vol. 21, pp. 55–69. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63257-5_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    OECD: Skills for a digital world. Policy brief on the future of work. OECD Publishing, Paris (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eurostat: ICT specialists in employment. Technical report, European Union (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berman, E., Bound, J., Machin, S.: Implications of skill-biased technological change: international evidence. Q. J. Econ. 113(4), 1245–1279 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Autor, D.H., Katz, L.F., Krueger, A.B.: Computing inequality: have computers changed the labor market? Technical report 5956. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA (1997)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Falk, M., Biagi, F.: Relative demand for highly skilled workers and use of different ICT technologies. Appl. Econ. 49(9), 903–914 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Spiezia, V.: Jobs and skills in the digital economy. OECD Observer (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roland Berger Strategy Consultants: The digital transformation of industry: How important is it? Who are the winners? What must be done now? A European study commissioned by the Federation of German Industries (BDI) and conducted by Roland Berger Strategy Consultants (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    European Comission: The Digital Single Market - State of Play. European Union (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Berger, T., Frey, C.B.: Digitalization, jobs and convergence in Europe: strategies for closing the skills gap. Technical report, University of Oxford (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tieto- ja viestintätekniikan ammattilaiset TIVIA ry: Ohjelmisto-osaaminen Suomen talouskasvun ja uudistumisen jarruna – vuonna 2020 Suomesta puuttuu 15 000 ohjelmistoammattilaista (2017). Press releaseGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Naumanen, M., et al.: Tekbaro 2017. Tekniikan akateemiset TEK, Helsinki, Finland (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Luoma, E., Rönkkö, M., Tahvanainen, S.: Finnish software industry survey 2017 (In Finnish Ohjelmistoyrityskartoitus 2017) (2017). http://www.softwareindustrysurvey.fi/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Oskari2017-vfinal.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2018
  23. 23.
    Rönkkö, M., et al.: National software industry survey 2008: The finnish software industry in 2007. Technical report, Helsinki University of Technology (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Haaparanta, P., et al.: 100 vuotta pientä avotaloutta - Suomen ulkomaankaupan kehitys, merkitys ja näkymät. Technical report, Valtioneuvoston selvitys- tutkimustoiminta (2017)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chakravorti, B., Bhalla, A., Chaturvedi, R.S.: 60 countries’ digital competitiveness, indexed. Harvard Business Review (2017)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Korte, W.B., Hüsing, T., Dashja, E.: High-Tech Leadership Skills for Europe - Towards an Agenda for 2020 and beyond. European Communities (2017)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Robinson, H., Segal, J., Sharp, H.: Ethnographically-informed empirical studies of software practice. Inf. Softw. Technol. 49(6), 540–551 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sonja M. Hyrynsalmi
    • 1
  • Minna M. Rantanen
    • 2
  • Sami Hyrynsalmi
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Future TechnologiesUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland
  2. 2.Turku School of EconomicsUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland
  3. 3.Tampere University of Technology, Pervasive ComputingPoriFinland

Personalised recommendations