Advertisement

ICT Changes Everything! But Who Changes ICT?

  • Hilde G. Corneliussen
  • Clem Herman
  • Radhika Gajjala
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 537)

Abstract

Information and communication technology (ICT) has a changing power and digitalization is gradually changing society in all aspects of life. Across the western world, men are in majority in the ICT industry, thus, the computer programs that change “everything” are most often made by men. Unless questioned, this male dominance can be perceived as a “norm” and becomes invisible. Against this background, this paper will provide three examples of how a feminist gaze can contribute to raise important questions and produce an awareness of how exclusion mechanisms have produce a highly homosocial tendency in design of ICT systems in the western world.

The three cases illustrate how a feminist gaze leading to feminist interventions can make a difference in various ways. The first author presents a case study of a pilot for involving programming in public education in secondary schools in Norway, where a complete lack of gender awareness makes this an offer for boys in most schools. Author two presents a case study comparing the situation in the IT business in the UK and India, finding challenges not only to the situation in the western world, but also to white western feminism. Author three discusses alternative ways of involving women in ICT work, through practices of feminist pedagogy, emphasizing hands-on work.

Keywords

Feminist theories ICT competence Feminist pedagogy Global perspectives 

References

  1. 1.
    Abbate, J.: Recoding Gender. Women’s Changing Participation in Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, London (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Belenky, M.F., Clinchy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R., Tarule, J.M.: Women’s Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. Basic Books, New York (1986)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bergman, S., Rustad, L.M.: The Nordic Region-A Step Closer to Gender Balance in Research? Joint Nordic Strategies and Measures to Promote Gender Balance Among Researchers in Academia. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bomberger, A.M.: Ranting about race: crushed eggshells in computer-mediated communication. Comput. Compos. 21(2), 197–216 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boyd, D.: It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale University Press, New Haven (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bruns, A.: From prosumer to produser: understanding user-led content creation (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Charles, M., Bradley, K.: A matter of degrees: female underrepresentation in computer science programs cross-nationally. In: Cohoon, J.M., Aspray, W. (eds.) Women and Information Technology. Research on Underrepresentation, pp. 183–203. MIT Press, Cambridge, London (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Charles, M., Bradley, K.: Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. Am. J. Sociol. 114(4), 924–976 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Collins, P.H.: Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Routledge, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Corneliussen, H.G., Prøitz, L.: Kids Code in a rural village in Norway: could code clubs be a new arena for increasing girls’ digital interest and competence? Inf. Commun. Soc. 19(1) (2016). Special Issue: Understanding Global Digital CulturesGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Corneliussen, H.G., Tveranger, F.: Programming in secondary schools in Norway – a wasted opportunity for inclusion. In: Proceedings of Gender&IT 2018, Heilbronn, Germany, May 2018 (Gender&IT 2018), pp. 172–182. ACM, New York (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dralega, C.A., Mainsah, H.: Ethnic minority youth participation in the production and consumption of social media in Norway. Vestlandsforsking-rapport nr. 4/2014 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ensmenger, N.: Making programming masculine. In: Misa, T.J. (ed.) Gender Codes: Why Women are Leaving Computing, pp. 115–141. IEEE Computer Society and Wiley, Hoboken (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Faulkner, W., Lie, M.: Gender in the information society: strategies of inclusion. Gend. Technol. Dev. 11(2), 157–177 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gajjala, R., Altman, M.: Producing cyber-selves through technospatial praxis: Studying through doing. In: Liamputtong, P. (ed.) Health Research in Cyberspace, pp. 67–84. Hauppauge, NY, Nova Publishers (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gajjala, R., Oh, Y.J.: Cyberfeminism 2.0: where have all the cyberfeminists gone? Cyberfeminism 2, 1–9 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gürer, D.W.: Pioneering women in computer science. Commun. ACM 38(1), 45–54 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kortuem, G., Bandara, A., Smith, N., Richards, M., Petre, M.: Educating the Internet-of-Things generation. Comput. Educ. 46(2), 53–61 (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Massanari, A.: # Gamergate and the Fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media Soc. 19(3), 329–346 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ministry of Human Resource Development: All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE) 2014–2015, Ministry of Human Resource Development - Department of Higher Education (2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pasquale, F.: The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms that Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sondhi, G., Raghuram, P., Herman, C.: Skilled migration and IT sector: a gendered analysis. In: Rajan, S.I. (ed.) India Migration Report, 2018, New Delhi, India, Routledge (2018 forthcoming)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rushkoff, D.: Program or Be Programmed: Ten Commands for a Digital Age, Soft Skull Press, Berkeley (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shirky, C.: Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations. Penguin Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Taylor, T.L.: Multiple pleasures: women and online gaming. Convergence 9(1), 21–46 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    World Bank: Labor force participation rate, female (2015). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS/countries/1W?display=default. Accessed 28 Jan 2017

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hilde G. Corneliussen
    • 1
  • Clem Herman
    • 2
  • Radhika Gajjala
    • 3
  1. 1.Western Norway Research InstituteSogndalNorway
  2. 2.Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK
  3. 3.Bowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations