Advertisement

On the Complex Relationship Between ICT Systems and the Planet

  • Norberto Patrignani
  • Iordanis Kavathatzopoulos
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 537)

Abstract

This paper addresses the challenges of designing sustainable Information and Communication Technology (ICT) systems. The complexity of ICT systems, the number of stakeholders involved (technology providers, policy makers, users, etc.), and the extension and global scale of ICT supply chain are the main challenges at the core of the complex relationship between ICT systems and the planet Earth. ICT offer an opportunity for an exchange between matter-energy and information: the better use of information offers the great opportunity for decreasing the environmental impact of human activities by decreasing the matter and energy consumption. But, on the other side, like any human activity, the design, production, use, and disposal of complex ICT systems, has as a consequence a growth in entropy. This intriguing dilemma is one of the most difficult challenges in front of designers, ICT companies, users, and policy makers. This paper concentrates on the designers, the engineers’ dilemmas: what are the ethical competences, the skills, the methods for addressing these complex ethical dilemmas? Among the many ethical approaches, the “virtue/future ethics” is proposed as a core ethical competence for the designers and engineers of the future.

Keywords

Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Entropy Future ethics Fairphone Slow tech 

References

  1. 1.
    Herculano-Houiel, S.: The human brain in numbers: a linearly scaled-up primate brain. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 3, 31 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.031.2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    GeSI: ICT Solutions for 21st Century Challenges, Global e-Sustainability Initiative. http://smarter2030.gesi.org/. Accessed 20 Jan 2018
  3. 3.
    Internetstats: Internet Usage Statistics, The Internet Big Picture, World Internet Users and 2017 Population Stats. www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm. Accessed 20 Jan 2018
  4. 4.
    Greenpeace: From Smart to Senseless: The Global Impact of 10 Years of Smart-phones (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    SVTC: Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition, October 2007Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vazquez-Figueroa, A.: Coltan, Ediciones B (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leff, H., Rex, A.F.: Maxwell’s Demon, Entropy, Information, Computing. CRC Press (1990)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Szilard, L.: On the reduction of entropy in a thermodynamic system by the intervention of intelligent beings. Zeitschrift für Physik. 53(11–12), 840–856 (1929)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brillouin, L.: Negentropy principle of information. J. Appl. Phys. V24(9) (1953)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Landauer, R.: Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process. IBM J. Res. Dev. 5, 183–191 (1961)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ericsson: ICT and Power, Energy Performance Report 2016 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baldé, C.P., Wang, F., Kuehr, R., Huisman, J.: The Global e-waste Monitor, United Nations University (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bernhardt, A., Gysi, N. (eds.): The Worlds Worst 2013: The Top Ten Toxic Threats, Blacksmith Institute, Green Cross Switzerland (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Step: Solving the e-waste problem. www.step-initiative.org. Accessed 20 Jan 2018
  15. 15.
    Arduino: Arduino: an open source electronics platform. http://www.arduino.cc. Accessed 20 Jan 2018
  16. 16.
    Lovins, L.H.: Rethinking Production, State of the World 2008 - Innovations for a Sustainable World. The Worldwatch Institute, Washington, D.C. (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fairphone: The modular phone that’s built to last. www.fairphone.com. Accessed 20 Jan 2018
  18. 18.
    Greenpeace:Guide to Greener Electronics 2017. http://www.greenpeace.org/greenerguide.org. Accessed 20 Jan 2018
  19. 19.
    Patrignani, N., Whitehouse, D.: Slow Tech and ICT. A Responsible, Sustainable and Ethical Approach, Palgrave-MacMillan (2018). ISBN 978-3-319-689449Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pritchard, M.S.: Responsible engineering. The importance of character and imagination. Sci. Eng. Ethics 7(3), 391–402 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Van de Poel, I., Royakkers, L.: Ethics, Technology, and Engineering. An Introduction. Wyley-Blackwell, Oxford (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics, Papyros, Athens (1975)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Arendt, H.: Responsibility and Judgement. Schocken, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jonas, H.: The Imperative of Responsibility. In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1985)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nova: Enhanced greenhouse effect - a hot international topic, Nova, Australian Academy of Science (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Madsen, M.: Into Eternity: A Film for the Future. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1194612/?ref_=nm_ov_bio_lk1. Accessed 20 Jan 2018
  27. 27.
    Birnbacher, D.: What motivates us to care for the (distant) future? Working Papers N°04/2006. Iddri, 27 p. (2006). Conference by Dieter Birnbacher, Seminar on Sustainable Development, 21 February 2006Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Singer, N.: Tech’s Ethical ‘Dark Side’: Harvard, Stanford and Others Want to Address It, New York Times, 12 February 2018Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norberto Patrignani
    • 1
  • Iordanis Kavathatzopoulos
    • 2
  1. 1.Politecnico of TorinoTurinItaly
  2. 2.Uppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations