Advertisement

Capturing Bodies as Objects: Stereography and the Diorama at Work in Kris Verdonck’s ISOS

  • Kristof van BaarleEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Avant-Gardes in Performance book series (AGP)

Abstract

In this chapter, theatre scholar and dramaturge Kristof van Baarle analyses the older media that are part of a conceptual and technological genealogy of ISOS, an installation by Belgian artist Kris Verdonck. The function of stereography, Muybridge’s chronophotography, and the diorama in the political and economic apparatuses of the nineteenth century allows for a deeper understanding of ISOS’ critical and political use of new media. This media-archaeological approach of ISOS sheds new light on how it reflects the critique of the society of the spectacle (Debord) that is at work in the oeuvre of J.G. Ballard, whose writings were at the basis of this installation. Following Agamben, van Baarle demonstrates that the seed of resistance was already planted in the early uses of these technologies as well.

References

  1. Agamben, Giorgio. 1993. The Coming Community. Trans. Michael Hardt. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2000. Means Without Ends: Notes on Politics. Trans. Vincenzo Binetti and Cesare Casarino. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2007. Profanations. Trans. Jeff Fort. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2009. What Is an Apparatus? And Other Essays. Trans. David Kishik and Stefan Pedatella. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Augé, Marc. 2008. Non-Places. Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. Trans. John Howe. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  6. Bal, Mieke. 1992. Telling, Showing, Showing Off. Critical Inquiry 18 (9): 556–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ballard, James Graham. 2006. The Atrocity Exhibition. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
  8. Barber, Lynn. 2012. Sci-fi Seer. In Extreme Metaphors. Selected Interviews with J.G. Ballard, 1967–2008, ed. Simon Sellars and Dan O’Hara. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
  9. Baudrillard, Jean. 1988. The Ecstasy of Communication. Trans. Bernard and Caroline Schutze. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2001. Simulacra and Simulation. Trans. Sheila Faria Glaser. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Benjamin, Walter. 2007. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. In Walter Benjamin, Illuminations. Essays and Reflections, ed. Hannah Arendt, 217–252. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  12. Bennett, Susan. 2013. Theatre and Museums. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Colligan, Colette. 2008. Stereograph. Victorian Review 34 (1): 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crary, Jonathan. 1988. Techniques of the Observer, October 45: 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Debord, Guy. 1995. The Society of Spectacle. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  16. Depper, Corin. 2008. The Cinematic Imagination of J.G. Ballard. In J.G. Ballard. Contemporary Critical Perspectives, ed. Jeanette Baxter, 50–65. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, Michel. 1995 [1977]. Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Random House Inc.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2012 [1966]. Les Mots Et Les Choses. Une Archéologie Des Sciences Humaines. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
  19. Fowles, Jib. 1994. Stereography and the Standardization of Vision. Journal of American Culture 17 (2): 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gurevitch, Leon. 2012. The Birth of a Stereoscopic Nation: Hollywood, Digital Empire and the Cybernetic Attraction. Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal 7 (3): 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ———. 2013. The Stereoscopic Attraction: Three-Dimensional Imaging and the Spectacular Paradigm 1850–2013. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 19 (4): 396–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Han, Byung-Chul. 2014. De Vermoeide Samenleving: Drie Essays. Trans. Frank Schuitemaker. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Van Gennep.Google Scholar
  23. Huhtamo, Erkki. 2013. Illusions in Motion: Media Archaeology of the Moving Panorama and Related Spectacles. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Prozorov, Sergei. 2011. Pornography and Profanation in the Political Philosophy of Giorgio Agamben. Theory, Culture & Society 28 (4): 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rancière, Jacques, Garbiel Rockhill, and Slavoj Zizek. 2009. The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  26. Schröter, Jens. 2014. 3d: History, Theory and Aesthetics of the Transplane Image. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  27. Solnit, Rebecca. 2003. The Annihilation of Time and Space. New England Review 24 (7): 5–19.Google Scholar
  28. Spampinato, Francesco. 2016. Body Surrogates: Mannequins, Life-Size Dolls, and Avatars. PAJ 38 (2): 1–20.Google Scholar
  29. Stalpaert, Christel, and Evelien Jonckheere. 2015. De Waarheidscommissie Volgens Chokri Ben Chikha. Het Performen Van Differentiële Toekomsten Vanuit Een Traumatisch Koloniaal Verleden. DOCUMENTA 33 (2): 128–163.Google Scholar
  30. Vanhoutte, Kurt. 2010. Two-Fold Origin: Performing Hybrids between Theatre and Media. Contemporary Theatre Review 20 (4): 475–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Žižek, Slavoj. 2009. On Violence. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium
  2. 2.Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations