Advertisement

Subjects and Failed Subjects in Place-Space-Time: The Quest for Meaning

  • Cornelia RouxEmail author
  • Anne Becker
Chapter
Part of the Interdisciplinary Studies in Human Rights book series (CHREN, volume 2)

Abstract

In this introduction to Part II, we explain how the continual (re)structuring of difference and diversity in categories of subjects and failed subjects in linear place-space-time influenced the why and the how of a NRF project Human Rights Literacy: Quest for meaning (2012–2016) (Roux, http://hrlit.org/documents, 2012) (Funded research projects of the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa.). In our understanding of linear place-space-time, the focus is on Lefebvre’s (Rhythmanalysis. Space, time and everyday life, 2013) notion of linear time (space) as repetitive social practices in difference. We argue that the repetitive nature of social practices, actions, structures and systems, concerning human rights, crystallise differently in everyday life and influence meaning making of human rights within diverse contexts. Humans move in, across and through linear place-space-time as they make meaning of human rights in everyday life. Similarly, human rights, as a social practice, and the social practices and processes of human rights, move in, through and across diverse linear place-space-time. These continual interactions and movements aid meaning making and the structuring of human rights literacies. The research project on human rights literacies commenced in April 2012 as a national funded project and concluded as an international survey (2015) in linear place-space-time through five countries (The final analyses of the survey data and the dissemination of the project ended in November 2016. The collaborators in the Netherlands conducted an extra focus group discussion in April 2017 to clarify some contextual issues.). The complexities of diverse countries, the cultural and contextual mappings of the different research sites and the voluntary participants were significant for the research team’s crystallisation of the data and conceptualisation of contextual human rights literacies.

References

  1. Al-Daraweesh, F., & Snauwaert, D. T. (2013). Towards a hermeneutical international human rights education. Educational Theory, 63(4), 389–411.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, A. (2017). Moral responsibility and human rights: Speaking to the ‘dark side of human rights’. South African Journal of Higher Education, 31(6), 45–60.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, A., De Wet, A., & Parker, G. (2014). Moving towards understanding one an-other: Cornelia Roux on religion, culture and human rights. Journal for the Study of Religion, 27(1), 234–266.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, A., De Wet, A., & Van Vollenhoven, W. (2015). Human rights literacy: Moving towards rights-based education and transformative action through understandings of dignity, equality and freedom. South African Journal of Education, 35(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
  5. Bill of Rights see South African Constitution.Google Scholar
  6. Cefai, S. (2018). Mediating affect in John Pilger’s Utopia: ‘The good life’ as a structure of whiteness. Cultural Studies, 32(1), 126–148.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. De Wet, A., Rothman, J., & Simmonds, S. (2016). Human rights: Protecting sexual minorities or reinforcing the boundaries of ‘the closet’? South African Review of Sociology: Special Edition, 47(1), 85–109.Google Scholar
  9. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dolan, P., Gundara, J., & King, L. (2011). The role of research for the promotion of rights and values in education: A commemorative paper – 60 years into human rights education. In Contemporary issues in human rights education. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  11. Du Preez, P., & Becker, A. (2016). Ontologies and possibilities of human rights: Exploring dissensus to facilitate reconciliation in post-conflict education contexts. Perspectives in Education, 34(3), 1–14.Google Scholar
  12. Du Preez, P., & Roux, C. (2010). Human rights values or cultural values? Perusing values to maintain discipline in multicultural schools. South African Journal of Education, 1(30), 13–26.Google Scholar
  13. Du Preez, P., Simmonds, S., & Roux, C. (2012). Teaching-learning and curriculum development for HRE: Two sides of the coin. Journal of Education, 55, 83–102.Google Scholar
  14. Ellingson, L. (2009). Engaging crystallization in qualitative research: An introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom, ethics, democracy and civic courage. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Gardiner, M. E. (2004). Everyday Utopianisms. Lefebvre and his critics. Cultural Studies, 18(2/3), 228–254.Google Scholar
  17. Guerin, C. (2013). Rhizomatic research cultures, writing groups and academic researcher identities. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 8, 137–150. Retrieved November 20, 2017, from http://ijds.org/Volume8/IJDSv8p137-150Guerin0400.pdfGoogle Scholar
  18. Hawkins, M. R. (2014). Ontologies of place, creative meaning making and critical cosmopolitan education. Curriculum Inquiry, 44(1), 90–112.Google Scholar
  19. Jacelon, C. S., & O’Dell, K. K. (2005). Case and grounded theory as qualitative research methods. Urologic Nursing, 23(1), 49–52.Google Scholar
  20. Jasper, J., & Abs, H. J. (chapter 6 in this volume). Student-teachers coping with changing times: The intersection of student-teachers’ understanding of human rights issues and their cultural identity. In C. Roux & A. Becker (Eds.), Human rights literacies: Future directions. Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Kapur, R. (2014). In the aftermath of critique we are not in epistemic freefall: Human rights, the subaltern subject, and non-liberal search for freedom and happiness. Law Critique, 25, 25–45.Google Scholar
  22. Keet, A. (2012). Discourse, betrayal, critique: The renewal of human rights education. In C. Roux (Ed.), Safe spaces: Human rights education in diverse contexts (pp. 7–28). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Keet, A. (2015). It is time: Critical human rights education in an age of counter-hegemonic distrust. Education as Change, 19(3), 46–64.Google Scholar
  24. Lather, P. (2007). Getting lost. Feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lefebvre, H. (2013). Rhythmanalysis. Space, time and everyday life. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  26. Lohrenscheit, C. (2002). International approaches to human rights education. International Review of Education, 48(3-4), 173–185.Google Scholar
  27. MacNaughton, G., & Koutsioumpas, K. (2017). Universal Human Rights Education for the Post-2015 Development Agenda. In J. Zajda & S. Ozowski (Eds.), Globalisation, human rights education and reforms (pp. 15–33). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Merriam, S. (2002). Qualitative research in practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Nicholls, R. (2009). Research and indigenous participation: Critical reflexive methods. Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(2), 117–126.Google Scholar
  30. Pillay, S. (2015). Why I am no longer a non-racialist. In X. Mangcu (Ed.), The colour of our future: Does race matter in post-apartheid South Africa? (pp. 133–152). Johannesburg, South Africa: Wits.Google Scholar
  31. Ranciere, J. (2015). Dissensus. On politics and aesthetics. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Republic of South Africa. (1996a). The Bill of Rights: Chapter 2 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Cape Town: Government Printers.Google Scholar
  33. Republic of South Africa. (1996b). The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Cape Town: Government Printers.Google Scholar
  34. Rothmann, J., & Simmonds, S. (2015). ‘Othering’ non-normative sexualities through objectification of ‘homosexual’: Discursive discrimination by pre-service teachers. Agenda: Empowering Women for Gender Equity, 29(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  35. Roux, C. (2010). Religious literacy and human rights literacy as prerequisite for human rights education. In G. Durka, L. Gearon, M. de Souza, & K. Engebretson (Eds.), International handbook for inter-religious education (Vol. 4, pp. 991–1015). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Roux, C. (2012a). Research proposal: Human Rights Literacy: Quest for meaning. Retrieved November 20, 2017, from http://hrlit.org/documents
  37. Roux, C. (2012b). A social justice and human rights education project: A search for caring and safe spaces. In C. Roux (Ed.), Safe spaces: Human rights education in diverse contexts (pp. 29–50). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. Roux, C. (2017). Human rights literacies and students’ paradoxical understandings of tolerance and respect. South African Journal of Higher Education, 31(6), 61–78.Google Scholar
  39. Roux, C., & Becker, A. (2015). Human rights literacies: Quest for meaning. Oslo, Norway: The European Wergeland Centre, Publications Editions of the Council of Europe. Retrieved November 30, 2015, from http://theewc.org/statement/human.rights.literacy.the.quest.for.meaning/Google Scholar
  40. Roux, C., & Becker, A. (2016). Humanising higher education in South Africa through dialogue as praxis. Educational Research for Social Change, 5(1), 131–143.Google Scholar
  41. Roux, C., & Becker, A. (2017). On critique, dissensus and human rights literacies. South African Journal for Higher Education, 31(6), 1–8.Google Scholar
  42. Roux, C., Becker, A., & De Wet, A. (2016). Human rights literacy: Quest for meaning. Referencing document. Retrieved February 12, 2017, from http://hrlit.org/documents
  43. Roux, C., & Du Preez, P. (2013). Human rights literacy: Quest for meaning. Retrieved May 20, 2015, from http://www.nwu.ac.za/sites/www.nwu.ac.za/files/files/Hreid%20cv%27s/Human%20rights%20literacya%20quest%20for%20meaning_blog%20en%20website.pdf
  44. Roux, C., Du Preez, P., & Ferguson, R. (2009). Understanding religious education through human rights values in a world of difference. In S. Miedema & W. Meijer (Eds.), Religious education in a world of difference (pp. 67–84). Munster/Berlin/New York/Munchen: Waxman.Google Scholar
  45. Roux, C., Du Preez, P., Simmonds, S., Ferguson, R., Perumal, J., De Wet, A., et al. (2013). Human rights education in diversity: Empowering girls in rural and metropolitan school environments. South African Netherlands Projects for Alternative Development (SANPAD)-project (Final Year Report, 100 pp).Google Scholar
  46. Simmonds, S. (2010). Primary school learners understanding of human rights teaching-learning in classroom practice. Unpublished MEd-Dissertation, North-West University, South Africa.Google Scholar
  47. Simmonds, S. (2014). Mapping the curriculum-making landscape of Religion Education from a human rights education perspective. Journal of the Study of Religion, 27, 129–153.Google Scholar
  48. South African Constitution. (1996a). The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Cape Town: Government Printers.Google Scholar
  49. South African Constitution. (1996b). The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, The Bill of Rights: Chapter 2 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Cape Town: Government Printers.Google Scholar
  50. Tibbitts, F. (2002). Understanding what we do: Emerging models for human rights education. International Review of Education, 48(3–4), 159–171.Google Scholar
  51. Tibbitts, F. (2017). Revisiting ‘emerging models of human rights education’. International Journal of Human Rights Education, 1(1), 2. Retrieved December 12, 2017, from http://repository.usfea.edu/ijhre/vol1/iss1/2Google Scholar
  52. Tibbitts, F., & Keet, A. (2017). Curriculum reform in transitional justice environments: The South African Human Rights Commission, Human rights education and the schooling sector. In J. Zaida & S. Ozowski (Eds.), Globalisation, human rights education and reforms (pp. 87–109). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  53. Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight BIG-Tent criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 837.Google Scholar
  54. UNDHR see United Nations.Google Scholar
  55. United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights (The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights). Retrieved March 18, 2018, from http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Education/Training/Pages/Decade.aspx; United Nations Commission on Human Rights on a World Program for Human Rights Education [2004/71]).
  56. Zembylas, M. (2015). Foucault and human rights: Seeking the renewal of human rights education. Journal of the Philosophy of Education, 50(3), 384–397.Google Scholar
  57. Zembylas, M. (2017). Re-contextualising human rights education: Some decolonial strategies and pedagogical/curricular possibilities. Pedagogy Culture and Society, 25(4), 1–13.Google Scholar
  58. Zembylas, M., & Bozalek, V. (2014). A critical engagement with the social and political consequences of human rights: The contribution of the affective turn and posthumanism. Acta Academica, 46(4), 29–47.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations