Skip to main content

Event Structure Semantics of (controlled) Reversible CCS

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Reversible Computation (RC 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11106))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

CCSK is a reversible form of CCS which is causal, meaning that actions can be reversed if and only if each action caused by them has already been reversed; there is no control on whether or when a computation reverses. We propose an event structure semantics for CCSK. For this purpose we define a category of reversible bundle event structures, and use the causal subcategory to model CCSK. We then modify CCSK to control the reversibility with a rollback primitive, which reverses a specific action and all actions caused by it. To define the event structure semantics of rollback, we change our reversible bundle event structures by making the conflict relation asymmetric rather than symmetric, and we exploit their capacity for non-causal reversibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aubert, C., Cristescu, I.: Contextual equivalences in configuration structures and reversibility. JLAMP 86(1), 77–106 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlamp.2016.08.004

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Boudol, G., Castellani, I.: Permutation of transitions: an event structure semantics for CCS and SCCS. In: de Bakker, J.W., de Roever, W.-P., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) REX 1988. LNCS, vol. 354, pp. 411–427. Springer, Heidelberg (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0013028

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Castellan, S., Hayman, J., Lasson, M., Winskel, G.: Strategies as concurrent processes. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 308, 87–107 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2014.10.006

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Crafa, S., Varacca, D., Yoshida, N.: Event structure semantics of parallel extrusion in the pi-calculus. In: Birkedal, L. (ed.) FoSSaCS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7213, pp. 225–239. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28729-9_15

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cristescu, I., Krivine, J., Varacca, D.: A compositional semantics for the reversible pi-calculus. In: IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS 2013, pp. 388–397. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2013.45

  6. Cristescu, I., Krivine, J., Varacca, D.: Rigid families for the reversible \(\pi \)-calculus. In: Devitt, S., Lanese, I. (eds.) RC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9720, pp. 3–19. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40578-0_1

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Danos, V., Krivine, J.: Reversible communicating systems. In: Gardner, P., Yoshida, N. (eds.) CONCUR 2004. LNCS, vol. 3170, pp. 292–307. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28644-8_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Fecher, H., Majster-Cederbaum, M., Wu, J.: Bundle event structures: a revised cpo approach. Inf. Process. Lett. 83(1), 7–12 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-0190(01)00310-6

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Lanese, I., Mezzina, C.A., Schmitt, A., Stefani, J.-B.: Controlling reversibility in higher-order pi. In: Katoen, J.-P., König, B. (eds.) CONCUR 2011. LNCS, vol. 6901, pp. 297–311. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23217-6_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Lanese, I., Mezzina, C.A., Stefani, J.-B.: Reversing higher-order pi. In: Gastin, P., Laroussinie, F. (eds.) CONCUR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6269, pp. 478–493. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15375-4_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Langerak, R.: Transformations and semantics for LOTOS. Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit Twente (1992). https://books.google.com/books?id=qB4EAgAACAAJ

  12. Medić, D., Mezzina, C.A.: Static vs dynamic reversibility in CCS. In: Devitt, S., Lanese, I. (eds.) RC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9720, pp. 36–51. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40578-0_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Mezzina, C.A., Koutavas, V.: A safety and liveness theory for total reversibility. In: TASE, pp. 1–8, September 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2017.8285635

  14. Nielsen, M., Plotkin, G., Winskel, G.: Petri nets, event structures and domains. In: Kahn, G. (ed.) Semantics of Concurrent Computation. LNCS, vol. 70, pp. 266–284. Springer, Heidelberg (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0022474

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Phillips, I., Ulidowski, I.: Reversibility and models for concurrency. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 192(1), 93–108 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2007.08.018

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Phillips, I., Ulidowski, I.: Reversibility and asymmetric conflict in event structures. JLAMP 84(6), 781–805 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlamp.2015.07.004. Special Issue on Open Problems in Concurrency Theory

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Phillips, I., Ulidowski, I., Yuen, S.: A reversible process calculus and the modelling of the ERK signalling pathway. In: Glück, R., Yokoyama, T. (eds.) RC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7581, pp. 218–232. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36315-3_18

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Phillips, I., Ulidowski, I., Yuen, S.: Modelling of bonding with processes and events. In: Dueck, G.W., Miller, D.M. (eds.) RC 2013. LNCS, vol. 7948, pp. 141–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38986-3_12

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Phillips, I., Ulidowski, I.: Reversing algebraic process calculi. J. Algebraic Logic Program. 73(1–2), 70–96 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlap.2006.11.002

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Vaandrager, F.W.: A simple definition for parallel composition of prime event structures. CS R 8903, Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, P. O. box 4079, 1009 AB Amsterdam, The Netherlands (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Winskel, G.: Event structure semantics for CCS and related languages. In: Nielsen, M., Schmidt, E.M. (eds.) ICALP 1982. LNCS, vol. 140, pp. 561–576. Springer, Heidelberg (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0012800

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the referees of RC 2018 for their helpful comments. This work was partially supported by EPSRC DTP award; EPSRC projects EP/K034413/1, EP/K011715/1, EP/L00058X/1, EP/N027833/1 and EP/N028201/1; and EU COST Action IC1405.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva Graversen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Graversen, E., Phillips, I., Yoshida, N. (2018). Event Structure Semantics of (controlled) Reversible CCS. In: Kari, J., Ulidowski, I. (eds) Reversible Computation. RC 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11106. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99498-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99498-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99497-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99498-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics