Advertisement

Family Organisation and Human Capital Inequalities in Historical Europe: Testing the Association Anew

  • Mikołaj Szołtysek
  • Radosław Poniat
  • Sebastian Klüsener
  • Siegfried Gruber
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Economic History book series (SEH)

Abstract

There has been a growing interest in the question of whether variation in family systems is a factor in the disparities in growth, development, and human capital formation. Studies by proponents of the field of new institutional economics have suggested that differences in family organisation could have considerable influence on regional developmental inequalities in today’s world, while a number of economic historians have argued that certain systems of marriage and household structure in the European past might have been more conducive than others to economic growth. Despite recent criticism of these ideas by Dennison and Ogilvie, who argued that the family has no exogenous effects on growth, the debate over this potential relationship continues. However, we believe that this discussion has suffered from a lack of historical data that would give a fuller picture of the rich diversity of family settings and from methodological shortcomings that have so far hindered the proper operationalisation of historical family systems and their potential effects on developmental outcomes. In this chapter, we apply a recently developed multidimensional measure of historical familial organisation, the Patriarchy Index (PI), and use spatially sensitive multivariate analyses to investigate its relationship with human capital levels, as approximated by numeracy across 115 populations of historical Europe. We find a strong negative association between the Patriarchy Index and regional numeracy patterns that remains significant even after controlling for a broad range of other important factors. Our observation that family-driven age- and gender-related inequalities, as captured by the index, are relevant for understanding variation in basic numeracy patterns in the past suggests that there are indeed important links between family organisation and human capital accumulation that merit further investigation.

Keywords

Family organisation Human capital Inequality Europe 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Jan Luiten van Zanden, Auke Rijpma, Jan Kok, and one anonymous reviewer for their comments on earlier versions of this draft. Any and all errors and omissions are our own.

References

Data Sources

  1. Gruber S, Szołtysek M (2017) Mosaic combined datafile, version 2017.1Google Scholar
  2. NEAA [Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency] (2016) HYDE [History database of the global environment], version 3.2. (beta). Bilthoven: NEAA. ftp://ftp.pbl.nl/hyde/hyde3.2/2016_beta_release/zip/ (files: 1800AD_pop.zip, 1800AD_lu.zip). Accessed 11 Sept 2016
  3. USGS [U.S. Geological Survey Center for Earth Resources Observation and Science] (2016) GTOPO30 global 30 arc-second elevation. Sioux Falls SD: USGS. http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/ (files: gt30e020n40, gt30e020n90, gt30w020n40, gt30w020n90, gt30w060n90). Accessed 31 Aug 2016

Literature

  1. A’Hearn B, Crayen D, Baten J (2009) Quantifying quantitative literacy: age heaping and the history of human capital. J Econ Hist 69:783–808Google Scholar
  2. Acemoglu D (2002) The theory of human capital investments. Lecture notes for graduate labor economics, 14.662, Part 1, Chapter 1, MITGoogle Scholar
  3. Alesina A, Giuliano P (2010) The power of the family. J Econ Growth 15:93–125Google Scholar
  4. Alesina A, Giuliano P (2014) Chapter 4: Family ties. In: Aghion P, Durlauf SN (eds) Handbook of economic growth, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 177–215Google Scholar
  5. Alesina A, Giuliano P, Nunn N (2013) On the origins of gender roles: women and the plough. Q J Econ 128(2):469–530Google Scholar
  6. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer Academic Publications, Dordrecht et al., 284 pGoogle Scholar
  7. Baten J, Szołtysek M, Campestrini M (2017) ‘Girl power’ in Eastern Europe? The human capital development of Central Eastern and Eastern Europe in the seventeenth to nineteenth centuries and its determinants. Eur Rev Econ Hist 21(1):29–63Google Scholar
  8. Bertocchi G, Bozzano M (2015) Family structure and the education gender gap: evidence from Italian provinces. CESifo Econ Stud 61(1):263–300Google Scholar
  9. Bivand RS, Pebesma E, Gomez-Rubio V (2013) Applied spatial data analysis with R, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Caldwell JC (1981) The mechanisms of demographic change in historical perspective. Popul Stud 35(1):5–27Google Scholar
  11. Caldwell J (1982) Theory of fertility decline. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Carmichael S, De Pleijt A, Van Zanden J, De Moor T (2016a) The European marriage pattern and its measurement. J Econ Hist 76(1):196–204.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050716000474 Google Scholar
  13. Carmichael SG, Dilli S, van Zanden JL (2016b) Introduction: family systems and economic development. Econ Hist Dev Reg 31(1):1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1080/20780389.2015.1132625 Google Scholar
  14. Chow EN-L, Zhao SM (1996) The one-child policy and parent-child relationships: a comparison of one-child with multiple-child families in China. Int J Sociol Soc Policy 16:35–62Google Scholar
  15. Crayen D, Baten J (2010) Global trends in numeracy 1820–1949 and its implications for long-term growth. Explor Econ Hist 47:82–99Google Scholar
  16. De Baca TC, Sotomayor-Peterson M, Smith-Castro V, Figueredo AJ (2014) Contributions of matrilineal and patrilineal kin alloparental effort to the development of life history strategies and patriarchal values: a cross-cultural life history approach. J Cross Cult Psychol 45:534–554.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113513068 Google Scholar
  17. De Moor T, Van Zanden JL (2010) Girl power: the European marriage pattern and labour markets in the North Sea region in the late medieval and early modern period. The Econ Hist Rev 63:1–33Google Scholar
  18. Dennison T, Ogilvie S (2014) Does the European marriage pattern explain economic growth? J Econ Hist 74:651–693Google Scholar
  19. Dennison TK, Ogilvie S (2016) Institutions, demography, and economic growth. J Econ Hist 76(1):205–217.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050716000486 Google Scholar
  20. Diebolt C, Hippe R (2016) Remoteness equals backwardness? Human capital and market access in the European regions: insights from the long run. Working Papers of BETA 2016-32, Bureau d’Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  21. Diebolt C, Perrin F (2013) From stagnation to sustained growth: the role of female empowerment. Am Econ Rev 103(3):545–549Google Scholar
  22. Dildar Y (2015) Patriarchal norms, religion, and female labor supply: evidence from Turkey. World Dev 76:40–61Google Scholar
  23. Duranton G, Rodríguez-Pose A, Sandall R (2009) Family types and the persistence of regional disparities in Europe. Econ Geogr 85(1):23–47Google Scholar
  24. Dyson T, Moore M (1983) On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Popul Dev Rev 9(1):35–60Google Scholar
  25. Emigh RJ (2002) Numeracy or enumeration? The uses of numbers by states and society. Soc Sci Hist 26(2002):653–698Google Scholar
  26. Feldman S (2001) Exploring theories of patriarchy: a perspective from contemporary Bangladesh. Signs 26(4):1097–1127Google Scholar
  27. Folbre N (1986) Cleaning house: new perspectives on households and economic development. J Dev Econ 22(1):5–40Google Scholar
  28. Folbre N (2012) The political economy of human capital. Rev Radical Polit Econ 44(3):281–292.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613412440240 Google Scholar
  29. Földvári P, van Leeuwen B, van Leeuwen-Li J (2012) How did women count? A note on gender specific age heaping differences in the 16th–19th century. Econ Hist Rev 65:304–313Google Scholar
  30. Foreman-Peck J (2011) The Western European marriage pattern and economic development. Explor Econ Hist 48(2):292–309Google Scholar
  31. Galor O, Klemp M (2014) The biocultural origins of human capital formation. NBER Working Paper No. 20474, September 2014Google Scholar
  32. Galor O, Weil DN (2000) Population, technology and growth. From the Malthusian regime to the demographic transition. Am Econ Rev 90(2000):806–828Google Scholar
  33. Goldewijk KK, Beusen A, Janssen P (2010) Long-term dynamic modeling of global population and built-up area in a spatially explicit way: HYDE 3.1. Holocene 20(4):565–573Google Scholar
  34. Goldin C (2016) Human capital. In: Handbook of Cliometrics. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 55–86Google Scholar
  35. Goode WJ (1963) World revolution and family patterns. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Greif A (2006) Family structure, institutions, and growth: the origins and implications of Western corporations. Am Econ Rev 96(2):308–312Google Scholar
  37. Grogan LA (2007) Patrilocality and human capital accumulation: evidence from Central Asia. Econ Transit 15(4):685–705Google Scholar
  38. Gruber S, Szołtysek M (2016) The Patriarchy Index: a comparative study of power relations across historical Europe. Hist Fam 21(2):133–174.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2014.1001769 Google Scholar
  39. Hajnal J (1965) European marriage patterns in perspective. In: Glass DV, Eversley DEC (eds) Population in history. Essays in historical demography. Edward Arnold, London, pp 101–143Google Scholar
  40. Halpern JM, Kaser K, Wagner RA (1996) Patriarchy in the Balkans: temporal and cross-cultural approaches. Hist Fam 1(4):425–442Google Scholar
  41. Hanuschek EA (2013) Economic growth in developing countries: the role of human capital. Econ Educ Rev 37(2013):204–212Google Scholar
  42. Hippe R, Baten J (2012) Regional inequality in human capital formation in Europe 1790–1880. Scand Econ Hist Rev 60:254–289Google Scholar
  43. Jimenez-Ayora P, Ulubaşoğlu MA (2015) What underlies weak states? The role of terrain ruggedness. Eur J Polit Econ 39:167–183Google Scholar
  44. Kambhampati U, Rajan R (2008) The ‘Nowhere’ children: patriarchy and the role of girls in India’s rural economy. J Dev Stud 44(9):1309–1341Google Scholar
  45. Kick E, Davis B, Lehtinen M, Wang L (2000) Family and economic growth: a world-system approach and a cross-national analysis. Int J Comp Sociol 41:225–244Google Scholar
  46. Klüsener S, Devos I, Ekamper P, Gregory I, Gruber S, Martí-Henneberg J, van Poppel F, da Silveira LE, Solli A (2014) Spatial inequalities in infant survival at an early stage of the longevity revolution: A pan-European view across 5000+ regions and localities in 1910. Demogr Res 30:1849–1864Google Scholar
  47. Kok J (2017) Women’s agency in historical family systems. In: van Zanden JL, Rijpma A, Kok J (eds) Agency, gender, and economic development in the world economy 1850–2000: testing the Sen hypothesis. Routledge, London, pp 10–50Google Scholar
  48. Koller M, Stahel WA (2011) Sharpening Wald-type inference in robust regression for small samples. Comput Stat Data Anal 55(8):2504–2515Google Scholar
  49. Kula W (1976) An economic theory of the feudal system. Towards a model of the Polish economy, 1500–1800 (trans: Lawrence Garner). NLB, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Kwon D-B (2009) Human capital and its measurement. Paper presented at the 3rd OECD World Forum on “statistics, knowledge and policy” charting progress, building visions, improving life, Busan, Korea, 27–30 October 2009Google Scholar
  51. Laslett P (1965) The world we have lost, 1st edn. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  52. Laslett P (1983) Family and household as work group and kin group: areas of traditional Europe compared. In: Wall R, Robin J (eds) Family forms in historic Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 513–563Google Scholar
  53. Le Bris D (2016) Family characteristics and economic development. Paper presented at the Utrecht Economic History Seminar, May 2016Google Scholar
  54. Lopez-Rodriguez J, Faina J, Lopez-Rodriguez J (2007) Human capital accumulation and geography: empirical evidence from the European Union. Reg Stud 41(2):217–234Google Scholar
  55. Macfarlane A (1987) Marriage and love in England: modes of reproduction 1300–1840. Basis Blackwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  56. Malhotra A, Schuler SR, Boender C (2002) Measuring women’s empowerment as a variable in international development. International Center for Research on Women and the Gender and Development Group of the World Bank. The World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  57. Manzel K, Baten J, Stolz Y (2012) Convergence and divergence of numeracy: the development of age heaping in Latin America from the seventeenth to the twentieth century. Econ Hist Rev 65:932–960Google Scholar
  58. Medick H (1976) The proto-industrial family economy: the structural function of household and family during the transition from peasant society to industrial capitalism. Soc Hist 1:291–315Google Scholar
  59. Nimkoff MF (ed) (1965) Comparative family systems. Houghton & Mifiin, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  60. Niraula B, Morgan SP (1996) Marriage formation, post-marital contact with natal kin and the autonomy of women: evidence from two Nepali settings. Popul Stud 50(1):35–50Google Scholar
  61. Ogilvie S, Küpker M (2015) Human capital investment in a late-developing economy: evidence from Württemberg, c. 1600–c. 1900. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1528Google Scholar
  62. Redding S, Schott PK (2003) Distance, skill deepening and development: will peripheral countries ever get rich? J Dev Econ 72(2):515–541Google Scholar
  63. Reher DS (1998) Family ties in Western Europe: persistent contrasts. Popul Dev Rev 4(2):203–234Google Scholar
  64. Rijpma A, Carmichael SG (2016) Testing Todd and Matching Murdock: global data on historical family characteristics. Econ Hist Dev Reg 31(1):10–46.  https://doi.org/10.1080/20780389.2015.1114415 Google Scholar
  65. Rosset E (1964) Aging process of population. The Macmillan Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Ruggles S (2012) The future of historical family demography. Ann Rev Sociol 38:423–441Google Scholar
  67. Sinha JBP (2014) Psycho-social analysis of the Indian mindset. Springer-India, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  68. Spoorenberg T (2007) Quality of age reporting: extension and application of the modified Whipple’s index. Population-E 62(4):729–742Google Scholar
  69. Stewart JQ (1942) A measure of the influence of a population at a distance. Sociometry 5(1):63–71Google Scholar
  70. Szołtysek M (2015a) Households and family systems in early modern Europe. In: Scott H (ed) The Oxford Handbook of early modern European History, 1350–1750, Volume I: peoples and place. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 313–341Google Scholar
  71. Szołtysek M (2015b) Rethinking East-Central Europe: family systems and co-residence in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, vol 2. Peter Lang, BernGoogle Scholar
  72. Szołtysek M (2015c) Age heaping and digit preference in eighteenth-century Poland-Lithuania: who was rounding off their age, and why? In: Guzowski P, Kuklo C (eds) Studies on family and household in preindustrial Poland. Białystok, Institute for Research of European Cultural Heritage, pp 163–195Google Scholar
  73. Szołtysek M, Gruber S (2016) Mosaic: recovering surviving census records and reconstructing the familial history of Europe. Hist Fam 21(1):38–60Google Scholar
  74. Szołtysek M, Kluesener S, Gruber S, Poniat R (2017) The Patriarchy Index: a new measure of gender and generational inequalities in the past. Cross-Cultural Research 51(3):228–262Google Scholar
  75. Szołtysek M, Poniat R, Gruber S (2018) Age heaping patterns in Mosaic data. Hist Methods 51(1):13–38Google Scholar
  76. Therborn G (2004) Between sex and power: family in the world, 1900–2000. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  77. Todd E (1987) The causes of progress: culture, authority and change (trans: Richard Boulin). Basil, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  78. Tollnek F, Baten J (2016) Age-heaping-based human capital estimates. In Diebolt C, Haupert M (eds) Handbook of cliometrics, Springer. pp 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40406-1_24 Google Scholar
  79. Triandis HC (2001) Individualism-collectivism and personality. J Pers 69:907–924.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696169 Google Scholar
  80. Weber M (1904) The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Scribner’s Press, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
  81. Whyte MK (1996) The Chinese family and economic development: obstacle or engine. Econ Dev Cult Chang 45(1):1–30Google Scholar
  82. Willigan JD, Lynch KA (1982) Sources and methods of historical demography. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  83. Wilson MFJ, O’Connell B, Brown C, Guinan JC, Grehan AJ (2007) Multiscale terrain analysis of multibeam bathymetry data for habitat mapping on the continental slope. Mar Geod 30:3–35Google Scholar
  84. Xiao H (1999) Independence and obedience: an analysis of child socialization values in the United States and China. J Comp Fam Stud 30(4):641–657Google Scholar
  85. Yohai VJ (1987) High breakdown-point and high efficiency robust estimates for regression. Ann Statist 15(2):642–656.  https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176350366 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mikołaj Szołtysek
    • 1
  • Radosław Poniat
    • 2
  • Sebastian Klüsener
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  • Siegfried Gruber
    • 6
  1. 1.Institute of HistoryUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland
  2. 2.University of BiałystokBiałystokPoland
  3. 3.Max Planck Institute for Demographic ResearchRostockGermany
  4. 4.Federal Institute for Population ResearchWiesbadenGermany
  5. 5.Vytautas Magnus UniversityKaunasLithuania
  6. 6.University of GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations