Advertisement

Gendered Welfare Regimes, Work–Family Patterns and Women’s Employment

  • Anne ReimatEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Economic History book series (SEH)

Abstract

The ways family members combine paid and unpaid work—work–family patterns—have evolved throughout history, in parallel with changes in gender relations and gender equality.

However, cross-country variations in work–family patterns are still marked.

This chapter analyses the evolution of employment patterns within the family after the Second World War from a gendered welfare regime perspective. Belonging to a given gendered welfare regime type has, in general, a strong explanative power in accounting for the design of work–family arrangements. Nevertheless, some countries are departing from what is expected, giving a more nuanced picture of the idea of a typical linear historical evolution, common to all industrialised countries, from a ‘male breadwinner family’ to a ‘dual full-time earner family’.

Keywords

Gender Employment Welfare regimes 

References

  1. Anttonen A, Sipilä J (1996) European social care services: is it possible to identify models? J Eur Soc Policy 6(2):87–100Google Scholar
  2. Bambra C (2005) Cash versus services: worlds of welfare and the decommodification of cash benefits and health care services. J Soc Policy 32(2):195–213Google Scholar
  3. Bardasi E, Gornick JC (2008) Working for less? Women’s part-time wages penalties across countries. Fem Econ 14(1):37–72Google Scholar
  4. Becker S (1991) A treatise on the family, Enlarged edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. Ben-Galim D, Silim A (2013) The sandwich generation. Older women balancing work and care. Institute for Public Policy Research Report, London, AugustGoogle Scholar
  6. Bettio F, Plantenga J (2004) Comparing care regimes in Europe. Fem Econ 10(1):85–113Google Scholar
  7. Carmichael SG, Dilli SD, van Zanden JL (2016) Introduction: family systems and economic development. Econ Hist Dev Reg 31(1):1–9Google Scholar
  8. Ciccia R, Bleijenbergh I (2014) After the male breadwinner model? Childcare services and the division of labor in European Countries. Soc Polit 21(1):50–79Google Scholar
  9. Crompton R (ed) (1999) Restructuring gender relations and employment: the decline of the male breadwinner. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Daric J (1958) Quelques vues sur le travail féminin non agricole en divers pays. Population 13(1):69–78Google Scholar
  11. Diebolt C, Perrin F (2013) From stagnation to sustained growth: the role of female employment. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 103(3):545–549Google Scholar
  12. Diebolt C, Perrin F (2014) The foundations of female employment revisited. Revue d’Economie Politique 124(4):587–597Google Scholar
  13. Eliason SR, Stryker R, Tranby E (2008) The welfare state, family policies, and women’s labour force participation: combining fuzzy-set and statistical methods to assess causal relations and estimate causal effects. In: Kenworthy L, Hicks A (eds) Methods and substance in macrocomparative analysis. MacMillan, New York, NY, pp 135–155Google Scholar
  14. Erhel C, Guergoat-Larivière M (2013) Labour market regimes, family policies, and women’s behavior in the EU. Fem Econ 19(4):76–109Google Scholar
  15. Esping-Andersen G (1990) The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Esping-Andersen G (1999) Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Esping-Andersen G, Billari FC (2015) Re-theorizing family demographics. Popul Dev Rev 41(1):1–31Google Scholar
  18. Fetahi-Vehapi M, Spasenoska I (2011) Determinants of the female employment rate in the European Union in comparison with non European countries. Eur Stud J 2(1):22–38Google Scholar
  19. Frankenstein L (1939) Women in industrial welfare work. Int Labour Rev XL(3):297–319Google Scholar
  20. Galasso V, Profeta P (2010) When the state mirrors the family: the design of pensions systems. Netspar Discussion Paper 7, 2010-026Google Scholar
  21. Giullari S, Lewis J (2005) The adult worker model family, gender equality and care. The search for new policy principles, and the possibilities and problems of a capabilities approach. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. Social Policy and Development Programme, 19, AprilGoogle Scholar
  22. Goldin C (1995) The U-shaped female labor force function in economic development and economic history. In: Schultz TP (ed) Investment in women’s human capital and economic development. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 61–90Google Scholar
  23. Goldin C (2006) The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. Am Econ Rev 96(2):1–21Google Scholar
  24. Gornick JC, Meyers MK (2005) Supporting a dual-earner/dual-carer society. In: Heymann J, Beem C (eds) Unfinished work: building equality and democracy in an era of working families. The New York Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Gornick JC, Meyers MK (2008) Creating gender egalitarian societies: an agenda for reform. Polit Soc 36(3):313–349Google Scholar
  26. Hicks A, Kenworthy L (2008) Family policies and women’s employment: a regression analysis. In: Kenworthy L, Hicks A (eds) Methods and substance in macrocomparative analysis. MacMillan, New York, pp 135–155Google Scholar
  27. Hollweg GH, Lederman D, Mitra D (2015) Structural reforms and labour-market outcomes: international panel-data evidence. World Econ 39(7):925–963Google Scholar
  28. Hook JL (2015) Incorporating “Class” into work-family arrangements: insight from and for three worlds. J Eur Soc Policy 25(1):14–31Google Scholar
  29. ILO (1951a) Facilities for women with home responsibilities. Int Labour Rev 63(3):287–301Google Scholar
  30. ILO (1951b) Employment of married women and mothers of family. Int Labour Rev 63(6):677–697Google Scholar
  31. ILO (1957) Part-time employment for women with family responsibilities. Int Labour Rev 75(6):543–553Google Scholar
  32. ILO (1962) Discrimination in employment or occupation on the basis of marital status. Int Labour Rev 85(3–4):262–282 and 368–389Google Scholar
  33. Jaumotte F (2003) Labour force participation of women: empirical evidence on the role of policy and other determinants in OECD countries. OECD Econ Stud 37Google Scholar
  34. Kotsadam A (2011) Does informal eldercare impede women’s employment? The case of European welfare states. Femin Econ 17(2):121–144Google Scholar
  35. Leitner S (2003) Varieties of familialism: the caring function of the family in comparative perspective. Eur Soc 5(4):353–375Google Scholar
  36. Lewin-Epstein N, Stier H (2013) Family, gender and work. European Social Survey. Norwegian Social Science Data Services at http://essedunet.nsd.uib.no/cms/topics/family/2/all.html
  37. Lewis J (1992) Gender and the development of welfare regimes. J Eur Soc Policy 2(3):159–173Google Scholar
  38. Lewis J (1997) Gender and welfare regimes: further thoughts. Soc Polit 4(2):160–177Google Scholar
  39. Lewis J (2001) The decline of the male breadwinner model: implications for work and care. Soc Polit 8(2):152–169Google Scholar
  40. Lewis J, Hobson B (1997) Introduction. In: Lewis J (ed) Lone mothers in European welfare regimes. Jessica Kinsley, London, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  41. Lewis J, Campbell M, Huerta C (2008) Patterns of paid and unpaid work in Western Europe: gender, commodification, preferences and the implications for policy. J Eur Soc Policy 18(1):21–37Google Scholar
  42. Lütkepohl H (1993) Introduction to multiple time series analysis, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  43. Mandel H, Semyonov M (2006) A welfare state paradox: state interventions and women’s employment opportunities in 22 countries. Am J Sociol 111(6):1910–1949Google Scholar
  44. Misra J, Budig MJ, Boeckmann I (2010) Work–family policies and the effects of children on women’s employment hours and wages. Community Work Fam 14(2):139–157Google Scholar
  45. Naldini M, Pavolini M, Solera C (2014) Does caring for the elderly affect mid-life women’s employment? Differences across regimes. Carlo Alberto Notebooks 368. OctoberGoogle Scholar
  46. Nelson M, Stephens JD (2013) The service transition and women’s employment. In: Wren A (ed) The political economy of the service transition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 147–170Google Scholar
  47. Olivetti C (2013) The female labor force and long-run development: the American experience in comparative perspective. NBER Working Paper No. 19131Google Scholar
  48. Orloff AS (2002) Women’s employment and welfare regimes. Globalization, export orientation and social policy in Europe and North America. Social Policy and Development. Program Paper no. 12. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, pp 1–49Google Scholar
  49. Pascall G, Lewis J (2004) Emerging Gender Regime and Policies for Gender Equality in a Wider Europe. J Soc Policy 33(3):373–394Google Scholar
  50. Plantenga J (2002) Combining work and care in the Polder model: an assessment of the Dutch part-time strategy. Crit Soc Policy 22(1):53–71Google Scholar
  51. Powell M, Barrientos A (2011) An audit of the welfare modelling business. Soc Policy Adm 45(1):69–84Google Scholar
  52. Ruggeri K, Bird C (2014) Single parents and employment in Europe. Short Statistical Report No. 3. European Commission, AprilGoogle Scholar
  53. Sainsbury D (1996) Gender, equality and welfare states. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  54. Saraceno C, Keck W (2011) Towards an integrated approach for the analysis of gender equity in policies supporting paid work and care responsibilities. Demogr Res 25(11):371–406Google Scholar
  55. Saxonberg S (2013) From defamilialization to degenderisation: toward a new welfare typology. Soc Policy Adm 47(1):26–49Google Scholar
  56. Scott JW, Tilly LA (1975) Women’s work and the family in nineteenth century Europe. Comp Stud Soc Hist 17(1):36–64Google Scholar
  57. Steiber N, Haas B (2012) State of the art. Advances in explaining women’s employment patterns. Soc Econ Rev 10:343–347Google Scholar
  58. Stier H, Lewin-Epstein N, Braun M (2001) Welfare regime, family-supportive policy, and women’s employment along the life course. Am J Sociol 106(6):1731–1760Google Scholar
  59. Tilly LA, Scott JW (1987) Women, work & family. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.REGARDsUniversity of ReimsReimsFrance

Personalised recommendations