Advertisement

Conventional Radiography in TMJ Imaging

  • Keith Horner
  • David MacDonald
Chapter

Abstract

Conventional radiography includes simple projectional X-ray imaging along with panoramic radiography. All except panoramic radiography are obsolete, although the reverse Towne’s view may still be used for suspected mandibular trauma, and cephalograms, although not specifically TMJ radiography, are also used in assessment of some TMJ disorders. The three-dimensional morphology of the bony components of the TMJ does not facilitate conventional radiography. Panoramic radiography can only provide a crude representation of the condyle and temporal component of the TMJ and provides no information about their interrelationships. Its role is as an initial assessment tool before deciding on cross-sectional imaging (CBCT, CT or MR) and to investigate patients with symptoms which might be explicable as dental in origin but which are not localised or specific enough to be assessed using intraoral radiography. Specific criteria can help to determine whether there is any value in using panoramic radiography, and routine screening is not supported by evidence.

Keywords

Temporomandibular joint Temporomandibular joint disorders Radiography X-rays Panoramic radiography Diagnosis Mandibular injuries 

References

  1. 1.
    Petersson A. What you can and cannot see in TMJ imaging—an overview related to the RDC/TMD diagnostic system. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:771–8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02108.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmad M, Hollender L, Anderson Q, Kartha K, Ohrbach R, Truelove EL, et al. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD): development of image analysis criteria and examiner reliability for image analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:844–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    MacDonald D. Temporomandibular joint. In: Oral and maxillofacial radiology: a diagnostic approach. Ames: Wiley; 2011. p. 225–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Perschbacher S. Temporomandibular joint abnormalities. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ, editors. Oral radiology principles and interpretation. 7th ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2014. p. 492–523.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Whitley AS, Jefferson G, Holmes K, Sloane C, Anderson C, Hoadley G. Clark’s positioning in radiography. 13th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boeddinghaus R, Whyte A. Trends in maxillofacial imaging. Clin Radiol. 2018;73:4–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2017.02.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tamimi D, Jalali E, Hatcher D. Temporomandibular joint imaging. Radiol Clin North Am. 2018;56:157–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2017.08.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mallya SM, Lurie AG. Panoramic imaging. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ, editors. Oral radiology principles and interpretation. 7th ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2014. p. 166–84.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tűrp JC, Vach W, Harbich K, Alt KW, Strub JR. Determining mandibular condyle and ramus height with the help of an Orthopantomogram®—a valid method? J Oral Rehabil. 1996;23:395–400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Elslande DC, Russett SJ, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Mandibular asymmetry diagnosis with panoramic imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008;134:183–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mawani F, Lam EW, Heo G, McKee I, Raboud DW, Major PW. Condylar shape analysis using panoramic radiography units and conventional tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;99:341–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmitter M, Gabbert O, Ohlmann B, Hassel A, Wolff D, Rammelsberg P, et al. Assessment of the reliability and validity of panoramic imaging for assessment of mandibular condyle morphology using both MRI and clinical examination as the gold standard. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;102:220–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fallon SD, Fritz GW, Laskin DM. Panoramic imaging of the temporomandibular joint: an experimental study using cadaveric skulls. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:223–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Crow HC, Parks E, Campbell JH, Stucki DS, Daggy J. The utility of panoramic radiography in temporomandibular joint assessment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005;34:91–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lecomber AR, Downes SL, Mokhtari M, Faulkner K. Optimisation of patient doses in programmable dental panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000;29:107–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E, Waltimo-Sirén J, Laatikainen T, Haukka J, Ekholm M. Application of segmented dental panoramic tomography among children: positive effect of continuing education in radiation protection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45:20160104.  https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160104.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    European Commission. Radiation protection 136. European guidelines on radiation protection in dental radiology. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2004. ISBN 92-894-5958-1. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/136_0.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2018.
  18. 18.
    Ogura I, Sasaki Y, Kaneda T. Analysis of mandibular condylar and glenoid fossa fractures with computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:902–6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-3085-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    iRefer guidelines: making the best use of clinical radiology. Version 8.0.1. London: Royal College of Radiologists. https://www.irefer.org.uk/. Accessed 22 June 2018.
  20. 20.
    Wilson IF, Lokeh A, Benjamin CI, Hilger PA, Hamlar DD, Ondrey FG, et al. Prospective comparison of panoramic tomography (zonography) and helical computed tomography in the diagnosis and operative management of mandibular fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1369–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    American Dental Association and US Department of Health and Human Services. The selection of patients for dental radiographic examinations. Revision 2012. https://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationEmittingProductsandProcedures/MedicalImaging/MedicalX-Rays/ucm116504.htm. Accessed 22 June 2018.
  22. 22.
    Kratz R, Walton JN, MacEntee MI, Nguyen CT, MacDonald DS. Panoramic radiographs made before complete removable dental prostheses fabrication: a retrospective study of clinical significance. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118:26–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schiffman E, Ohrbach R. Executive summary of the diagnostic criteria for Temporomandibular disorders for clinical and research applications. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016;147:438–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2016.01.007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Beddis HP, Davies SJ, Budenberg A, Horner K, Pemberton MN. Temporomandibular disorders, trismus and malignancy: development of a checklist to improve patient safety. Br Dent J. 2014;217:351–5.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.862.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.Division of Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology, Department of Oral, Biological and Medical Sciences, Faculty of DentistryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations