Advertisement

Creationist Positions

  • Tom Kaden
Chapter

Abstract

As mentioned above, there are many forms of “creationism” in the United States, and I think it is important for any social scientific analysis of creationism to first try and understand what these different ideas are about. This is because (and I hope to be able to show this further below) the kinds of ideas creationists harbor have a strong influence on what they are willing and able to do in order to promote them. If you think the other creationists are actually completely wrong and maybe not even Christian, you will find it hard to enter into coalitions with them. If the point of your creationist system is to spread the truth of the Bible, then you will have a harder time getting into public schools than if you focus on a few scientific issues, leaving questions of Biblical interpretation aside.

References

  1. Answers in Genesis. (2015). Statement of faith. https://answersingenesis.org/about/faith/. Accessed 19 Jan 2018.
  2. Behe, M. (2006). Darwin’s black box. The biochemical challenge to evolution. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Center for Science and Culture. (n.d.-a). Frequently asked questions. http://www.intelligentdesign.org/faq.php. Accessed 19 Jan 2018.
  4. Center for Science and Culture. (n.d.-b). What is intelligent design?. http://www.intelligentdesign.org/whatisid.php. Accessed 19 Jan 2018.
  5. Creation Research Society. (2018). Statement of belief. https://creationresearch.org/statement-of-belief/. Accessed 19 Jan 2018.
  6. Dawkins, R. (2006). The god delusion. London: Bantam Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dembski, W. A. (1998a). Introduction: Mere creation. In W. A. Dembski (Ed.), Mere creation. Science, faith & intelligent design (pp. 13–30). Downers Grove: InterVarsity.Google Scholar
  8. Denton, M. (1986). Evolution: A Theory in Crisis. Bethesda: Adler & Adler.Google Scholar
  9. Dembski, W. A. (2009). The end of christianity: Finding a good god in an evil world. Nashville: B&H Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Faulkner, D. (1999). The dubious apologetics of Hugh Ross. http://www.icr.org/article/3001 and http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/tj/v13/n2/hugh-ross. Accessed 19 Jan 2018.
  11. Frankowski, N. (2008). Expelled: No intelligence allowed. Rocky Mountain Pictures: Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
  12. Ham, K. (2006). The ghost of Darwin. Answers Magazine, 1(2), 20–22.Google Scholar
  13. Ham, K. (2009). Evolving tactics. Answers Magazine, 4(1), 82–84.Google Scholar
  14. Institute for Creation Research. (2018). Principles of scientific creationism/principles of biblical creationism. http://www.icr.org/tenets. Accessed 24 Jan 2018.
  15. Johnson, P. E. (2000). The wedge of truth: Splitting foundations of naturalism. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Marsh, F. L. (1941). Fundamental biology. Lincoln: The author.Google Scholar
  17. McCalla, A. (2006). The creationist debate. The encounter between the Bible and the historical mind. London/New York: T & T Clark International.Google Scholar
  18. Meyer, S. C. (2009). Signature in the cell: DNA and the evidence for intelligent design. London: HarperOne.Google Scholar
  19. Meyer, S. C. (2013). Darwin’s doubt: The explosive origin of animal life and the case for intelligent design. New York: HarperOne.Google Scholar
  20. Moreland, J. P. (1994). The creation hypothesis: Scientific evidence for an intelligent designer. InterVarsity: Downers Grove.Google Scholar
  21. Morris, H. (1984). History of modern creationism. San Diego: Master Books.Google Scholar
  22. New World Encyclopedia. (2014). Intelligent design. http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Intelligent_design. Accessed 13 Jan 2018.
  23. Numbers, R. L. (2006). The creationists. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Price, G. M. C. (1923). The new geology: A textbook for colleges, normal schools, and training schools; and for the general reader. Oakland: Pacific press publishing association.Google Scholar
  25. Ramm, B. (1954). The Christian view of science and scripture. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Ratzsch, D. (1998). Design, chance & theistic evolution. In W. Dembski (Hg.), Mere creation. Science, faith & intelligent design (pp. 289–312). Downers Grove: InterVarsity.Google Scholar
  27. Ross, H. (1989). The fingerprint of god. Orange: Promise Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Ross, M. (2009). God of the gaps. Answers Magazine, 4(1), 60–63.Google Scholar
  29. Sagan, C. (1980). Cosmos. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  30. Scott, E. (2000a). The creation/evolution continuum. http://ncse.com/creationism/general/creationevolution-continuum. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
  31. Ussher, J. (1650). Annales veteris Testamenti, a Prima Mundi Origine deducti, una cum Rerum Asiaticarum Aegypticarum Chronico, a temporis historici principio usque ad Maccabaicorum initia producto.Google Scholar
  32. Wells, J. (2000). Icons of evolution. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Wells, J. (2006). The politically incorrect guide to Darwinism and intelligent design. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Whitcomb, J. C., & Morris, H. (1961). The genesis flood. The biblical record and its scientific implications. Philipsburg: Presbyterian & Reformed Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Wood, T. C. (2009). Natural selection – Theory or reality? Answers Magazine, 4(1), 47–50.Google Scholar
  36. Woodward, T. (2003). Doubts about Darwin. A history of intelligent design. Grand Rapids: Baker Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom Kaden
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of SociologyBayreuth UniversityBayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations