Advertisement

Behavior of the Beam with a Lightweight Porous Structure in Its Core

  • Jozef Tkáč
  • Martin Pollák
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Structures, porosity of which have been modified, show special properties and functions that cannot be achieved by common conventional tools. A combination of the most suitable properties can be utilized in a particular application by controlling the composition of the porous structure. The article deals with the research of the influence of the volume ratio of the material on a behavior of the beam with the lightweight porous structure. For this research, the core inside the beam shell made of 1.431 steel was filled with a simple lattice structure with regular geometry. The beam was built-in on one side and loaded on the other. Using the finite element method, a static analysis of the beam was performed in the PTC Creo Simulate software, where the volume ratio of the material was controlled by the “struts” diameter, while the thickness of the beam shell remained constant. The analysis has shown that with an increasing volume ratio of the beam material, a stress value of the beam drops more sharply than a displacement value of the beam. The modal analysis of the beam was performed at the volume ratio 44.53%. Individual modes and obtained values of the natural frequencies were compared to the full-volume beam in order to evaluate the behavior of the lightweight beam under dynamic load. The results of the analysis have shown that the values of the natural frequencies of the lightweight beam are comparable to those of the solid beam and the deformation behavior of the both beams in the first six modes is similar.

Keywords

Beam Lattice structures Analysis Behavior DMLS technology 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The present contribution has been prepared with direct support of Ministry of Education of Slovak Republic by the projects KEGA 007TUKE-4/2018, VEGA 1/0795/19 and APVV-17-0380.

References

  1. 1.
    Misik, L., et al.: Side milling factors analysis affecting the surface irregularities of high-grade steel E295. Tech. Gaz. 15(2), 19–23 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    POSTERUS Homepage. http://www.posterus.sk/?p=7861. Accessed 15 May 2018
  3. 3.
    Monkova, K., et al.: Inverse processing of undefined complex shape parts from structural high alloyed tool steel. Adv. Mech. Eng. 6, 478748 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Petru, J., et al.: Influence of cutting parameters on heat-affected zone after laser cutting. Tech. Gaz. 20(2), 225–230 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Monkova, K., Monka, P.: Qualitative parameters of complex part produced by additive approach. In: ICMAE 2017, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 130–134 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Challis, V.J., et al.: High specific strength and stiffness structures produced using selective laser melting. Mater. Des. 63, 783–788 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saranathan, V., et al.: Structure, function, and self-assembly of single network gyroid (I4132) photonic crystals in butterfly wing scales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107(26), 11676–11681 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Monkova, K., et al.: Study of 3D printing direction and effects of heat treatment on mechanical properties of MS1 maraging steel. Arch. Appl. Mech., 1–14 (2018, in press)  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-018-1389-3
  11. 11.
    Hussein, A.Y.: The development of lightweight cellular structures for metal additive manufacturing, Ph.D. thesis, 228 p. (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hanzl, P., et al.: Cellular lattice structure produced by selective laser melting and its mechanical properties. In: Proceedings of the 26th DAAAM International Symposium, Vienna, Austria, pp. 748–752 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kohnen, P., et al.: Mechanical properties and deformation behavior of additively manufactured lattice structures of stainless steel. Mater. Des. 145, 205–217 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cizikova, A., et al.: Numerical and experimental modal analysis of gear wheel. MM Sci. J., 1232–1236 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.17973/mmsj.2016_11_201654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beards, C.: Structural Vibration: Analysis and Damping, 286 p. Arnold, London (1996). ISBN 340-64580-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Valicek, J., et al.: Analysis of signals obtained from surfaces created by abrasive waterjet by means of amplitude-frequency spectra and autocorrelation function. Tech. Gaz. 15(1), 25–31 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    Monkova, K., et al.: Three approaches to the gyroid structure modelling as a base of lightweight component produced by additive technology. In: CMSAM 2017, pp. 124–129. DEStech Publications, Lancaster (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dobransky, J., et al.: Monitoring diagnostic indicators during operation of a print machine. Adv. Sci. Tech. Res. J. 9(28), 34–39 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Manufacturing Technologies with Seat in PresovTechnical University of KosicePresovSlovakia

Personalised recommendations