Advertisement

Prediction of Tensile Failure Load for Maraging Steel Weldment by Acoustic Emission Technique

  • Gowri Shankar Wuriti
  • Tessy Thomas
  • Somnath Chattopadhyaya
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Maraging steel (Grade 250) pressurized chambers are used in booster stages for the launch vehicles and missiles. These are designed & realized with ultra high strength steels like Maraging steels in order to gain in range and pay load capabilities with optimal Factor-of-Safety(FOS). Effective manufacturing methodology and fracture control is a prime requirement however manufacturing processes give rise to defects that are inevitable. Non-Destructive Engineering techniques viz. ultrasonic testing, Radiography testing, Eddy current testing etc. address the issue of detecting passive defects only. Defects that are active i.e. critical and that could cause catastrophe shall be detected possibly during Proof pressure testing Strain gauge method adopted is restricted for strain measurements and is in-effective in detecting flaws as it is a highly localized. Acoustic Emission Technique (AET), as a whole field method, has ability to detect unstable flaws effectively. Acoustic emissions are generated due to defects, microstructural variation, presence of inclusions and second phase particles in metallic materials. AET identifies defects and discontinuities in terms of Acoustic Emission parameters. Sources of Acoustic Emission (AE) can be distinguished by their AE signature in terms of amplitude, Count and Energy. The severity can be quantified in terms of AE Parameters. In this paper an attempt is made towards predicting tensile failure load of Maraging Steel weldment with varying extents of notch thereby representing equivalent tight cracks as per Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM) design approach. Customized specimens were fabricated and notches were made using Electric Discharge Machining process. Tensile load has been applied to the test specimens with AE data acquisition. The AE distribution obtained from each specimen has been correlated to an equivalent Weibull distribution and represented in terms of weibull parameters. The significant Weibull parameters viz. Skewness (b value) and centroid of distribution curve (θ) are estimated. The distribution at a load of 85% of failure load is used for the prediction process. An empirical relation connecting Weibull parameters b, θ, b * θ, is proposed. It is observed that the product b * θ is linearly correlated to tensile failure load. On comparing results, predicted tensile failure load is closely matching to the recorded tensile failure load of the specimen. The average prediction capability of the proposed model is within 5–6%.

Keywords

Acoustic Emission (AE) Failure load prediction Weibull distribution 

List of Abbreviations

AE

- Acoustic Emission

UT

- Ultrasonic Testing

AET

- Acoustic Emission Testing

LEFM

- Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics

EDM

- Electric Discharge Machining

GTAW

- Gas Tungsten Arc Welding

FOS

- Factor of Safety

NDE

- Non Destructive Engineering

NDT

- Non Destructive Testing

SAE

- Society for Automobile Engineers

AMS

- Aerospace Material Specifications

PAC

- Physical Acoustics Corporation

TIG

- Tungsten Inert Gas (welding)

HAZ

- Heat Affected Zone

HRC

- Rockwell Hardness

PZT

- Lead-Zirconate Titanate

FL

- Failure Load

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to the Director General, Missiles and Strategic Systems Defence Research & Development Organization (DRDO), New Delhi and Director, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad for extending full support in carrying out the above research and for giving permission to publish the work.

References

  1. 1.
    Yamamoti, S., Tsupikawa, T., Nakaro, M., Veyana, H.: Acoustic emission testing of pressure vessels made of 2¼ Cr – 1 Mo steel, Non-Destructive Examination in Relation to Structural Integrity, pp. 19–39 (1980)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chelladurai, T., et al.: Acoustic emission technique – an effective tool for the integrity evaluation of M250 maraging steel aerospace pressure chambers. In: Trends in NDE Science and Technology: Proceedings of the 14th WCNDT, 8–13 December 1996, vol. 4, pp. 2409–2412 (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kumar, P., Saw, K., Kumar, U., et al.: Effect of laser power and welding speed on microstructure and mechanical properties of fibre laser welded Inconel 617 thin sheet. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 39, 4579–4588 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krolczyk, J.B., et al.: Topographic inspection as a method of weld joint diagnostic. Teh. Vjesn. 23(1), 301–306 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miller, R.K., McIntire, P. (eds.): Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Acoustic Emission Testing, vol. 5, 2nd edn. American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Columbus (1987)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hay, D.R., Chan, R.W.Y., Sharp, D., Siddiqui, K.J.: Classification of acoustic emission signals from deformation mechanisms in aluminum alloys. J. Acoust. Emiss. 3(3), 118–129 (1984)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pollock, A.A.: Acoustic emission amplitude distributions. Int. Adv. Nondestr. Test. 7, 215–239 (1981)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gross, N.O., Loushin, L.L., Thompson, J.L.: Acoustic emission testing of pressure vessels for petroleum refiners and chemical plants. In: ASTM STP, vol. 505, pp. 270–296 (1972)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Subba Rao, V. et al.: Analysis of acoustic emission data obtained during pressure testing of M250 maraging steel rocket motor cases. In: Trends in NDE Science and Technology: Proceeding of the 14th World Conference on NDT, vol. 4, pp. 2427–2450 (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chelladurai, T., et al.: Acoustic emission response of 18% Ni maraging steel weldment with inserted cracks of varying depth to thickness ratio. J. Mater. Eval. 53, 742–746 (1995)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krolczyk, G.M., Nieslony, P., Krolczyk, J.B., Samardzic, I., Legutko, S., Hloch, S.: Influence of argon pollution on the weld surface morphology. Measurement 70, 203–213 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Properties and Selection: Irons, Steels and High performance Alloys. ASM Handbook, vol. 1 (1990)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Inspection, Ultrasonic, of thin Materials 12.7 mm and under in cross-sectional thickness, AMS 2632A, Aerospace Material Specification, SAEGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chelladurai, T., et al.: Micro structure studies on M 250 maraging steel weldment in relation to acoustic emission. In: Trends in NDE Science and Technology: Proceedings of the 14th WCNDT, vol. 4, pp. 2399–2403 (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Walker, J. II.: Ultimate strength prediction of ASTM tensile specimens from acoustic emission amplitude data. In: AIAA-92-0258, Proceedings of 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV (1992)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scheaffer, R.L., McClave, J.T.: Probability and Statistics -for Engineers, 2nd edn. Duxbury Press, Boston (1986)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gowri Shankar Wuriti
    • 1
  • Tessy Thomas
    • 2
  • Somnath Chattopadhyaya
    • 3
  1. 1.Advanced Systems Laboratory, DRDOHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.Advanced Systems LaboratoryHyderabadIndia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology (ISM) DhanbadDhanbadIndia

Personalised recommendations