Lean and Green Supplier Selection Problem: A Novel Multi Objective Linear Programming Model for an Electronics Board Manufacturing Company in Turkey

  • Ahmet Çalık
  • Turan Paksoy
  • Sandra Huber
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 274)


Even though various studies are proposed to evaluate and determine the best suppliers, studies generally consider similar factors such as cost, quality, delivery time etc. in the supplier selection problem. Nowadays, some lean and green issues such as on time (JIT) delivery, waste reduction, avoidance and treatment of hazardous materials, energy efficiency, occupational health and safety, corporate social responsibility, etc. started to be addressed together with the supplier selection process. Lean and Green Supply Chain Management (L-GSCM) is a dynamic field for companies to gain advantages in the competitive business market place. In the light of these concepts a new supplier selection process is developed for an electronics board manufacturing company in Turkey. We present an integrated approach which consists of three stages. In the first stage, the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) method is applied in order to determine the weights of the lean and green criteria with respect to different experts’ judgments using linguistic terms. At the second stage, linguistic judgments related to qualitative drivers are provided from decision makers. Then these fuzzy, judgements are aggregated by means of fuzzy group decision making and deffuzzified to crisp scores. The outputs of this stage are the quantitative data of a Multi-Objective Linear Programming (MOLP) model. In the third stage, a novel Fuzzy Weighted Additive Max-Min approach with Group Decision-Making (F-WAMG) is proposed and applied to guarantee that satisfaction degrees of each objective functions in the MOLP model are greater than or equal to their own weights. The proposed model and solution approach is applied to an electronics board manufacturing company in Turkey. The results point out that the proposed F-WAMG approach yields consistent satisfaction degrees with respect to weights of objectives that represent decision makers’ preferences and judgements.


  1. Abdollahi, M., Arvan, M., & Razmi, J. (2015). An integrated approach for supplier portfolio selection: Lean or agile? Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 679–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amid, A., Ghodsypour, S. H., & O’Brien, C. (2006). Fuzzy multiobjective linear model for supplier selection in a supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 104, 394–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amin, S. H., & Zhang, G. (2012). An integrated model for closed-loop supply chain configuration and supplier selection: Multi-objective approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 6782–6791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aradhye, A. S., & Kallurkar, S. P. (2014). A case study of just-in-time system in service industry. Procedia Engineering, 97, 2232–2237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Australian Government Department of Environment, W., Heritage and the Arts. Environmental management system tool. Retrieved from Google Scholar
  6. Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S. S., & Goyal, S. K. (2010). A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers. International Journal of Production Economics, 126, 370–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Awasthi, A., & Kannan, G. (2016). Green supplier development program selection using NGT and VIKOR under fuzzy environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 91, 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17, 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cabral, I., Grilo, A., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2012). A decision-making model for lean, agile, resilient and green supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 50, 4830–4845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carvalho, H., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2009). Integrating lean, agile, resilience and green paradigms in supply chain management (LARG_SCM) (pp. 3–14). Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management.Google Scholar
  11. Commission of the European Communities. (2001). Green paper: Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility.Google Scholar
  12. Daddi, T., Frey, M., De Giacomo, M. R., Testa, F., & Iraldo, F. (2015). Macro-economic and development indexes and ISO14001 certificates: A cross national analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108(Part A), 1239–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dües, C. M., Tan, K. H., & Lim, M. (2013). Green as the new lean: How to use lean practices as a catalyst to greening your supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emmett, S., & Sood, V. (2010). Green supply chains: An action manifesto. Chichester: Wiley. ISBN: 978-0-470-68941-7.Google Scholar
  15. Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Eshragh, A. (2015). A tradeoff model for green supply chain planning: A leanness-versus-greenness analysis. Omega, 54, 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garza-Reyes, J. A., Villarreal, B., Kumar, V., & Molina Ruiz, P. (2016). Lean and green in the transport and logistics sector – a case study of simultaneous deployment. Production Planning & Control, 27, 1221–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Global Issues. (2016). Climate change and global warming introduction. Accessed November 16, 2016, from
  18. Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Jafarian, A. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Govindan, K., & Sivakumar, R. (2016). Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: Integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches. Annals of Operations Research, 238, 243–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamdan, S., & Cheaitou, A. (2015). Green supplier selection and order allocation using an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS, AHP and IP approach (pp. 1–10). 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM).Google Scholar
  21. Hosseini, S., & Barker, K. (2016). A Bayesian network model for resilience-based supplier selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 180, 68–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huang, Y., Wang, K., Zhang, T., & Pang, C. (2016). Green supply chain coordination with greenhouse gases emissions management: A game-theoretic approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(Part 3), 2004–2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. İnan, U. H., Gül, S., & Yılmaz, H. (2017). A multiple attribute decision model to compare the firms’ occupational health and safety management perspectives. Safety Science, 91, 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kannan, D., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2014). Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company. European Journal of Operational Research, 233, 432–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kannan, D., Khodaverdi, R., Olfat, L., Jafarian, A., & Diabat, A. (2013). Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2001). Lean and green? An empirical examination of the relationship between lean production and environmental performance. Production and Operations Management, 10, 244–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krones, M., & Müller, E. (2014). An approach for reducing energy consumption in factories by providing suitable energy efficiency measures. Procedia CIRP, 17, 505–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kumar, M., Vrat, P., & Shankar, R. (2004). A fuzzy goal programming approach for vendor selection problem in a supply chain. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 46, 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kumar, M., Vrat, P., & Shankar, R. (2006). A fuzzy programming approach for vendor selection problem in a supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 101, 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuo, R. J., & Lin, Y. J. (2012). Supplier selection using analytic network process and data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 50, 2852–2863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kuo, R. J., Wang, Y. C., & Tien, F. C. (2010). Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 1161–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee, A. H. I., Kang, H.-Y., Hsu, C.-F., & Hung, H.-C. (2009). A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 7917–7927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ma, X., Ji, P., Ho, W., & Yang, C.-H. (2016). Optimal procurement decision with a carbon tax for the manufacturing industry. Computers & Operations Research.
  34. Mackay, M. M., Allen, J. A., & Landis, R. S. (2017). Investigating the incremental validity of employee engagement in the prediction of employee effectiveness: A meta-analytic path analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 27, 108–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martínez-Jurado, P. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2014). Lean management, supply chain management and sustainability: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 134–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Panasonic, Environment: Factory Waste Management – Zero Waste Emission. (2016). Improving factory waste recycling rate.
  37. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill International.Google Scholar
  38. Shahryari Nia, A., Olfat, L., Esmaeili, A., Rostamzadeh, R., & Antuchevičienė, J. (2016). Using fuzzy choquet integral operator for supplier selection with environmental considerations. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17, 503–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shaw, K., Shankar, R., Yadav, S. S., & Thakur, L. S. (2012). Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 8182–8192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shen, L., Olfat, L., Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Diabat, A. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier’s performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 74, 170–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tang, C., & Tomlin, B. (2008). The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks. International Journal of Production Economics, 116, 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. The Lean Enterprise Institute, Inc. (LEI). (2016). What is lean? Accessed August 1, 2016, from
  43. Tiwari, R. N., Dharmar, S., & Rao, J. R. (1987). Fuzzy goal programming — An additive model. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 24, 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ugarte, G. M., Golden, J. S., & Dooley, K. J. (2016). Lean versus green: The impact of lean logistics on greenhouse gas emissions in consumer goods supply chains. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22, 98–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yamagar, A. C., & Ravanan, P. M. (2016). Material management by using lean manufacturing principles a case study (pp. 104–112). Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Manufacturing Engineering.Google Scholar
  46. Yang, M. G., Hong, P., & Modi, S. B. (2011). Impact of lean manufacturing and environmental management on business performance: An empirical study of manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 129, 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yazdani, M., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2016). New integration of MCDM methods and QFD in the selection of green suppliers. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17, 1097–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yeh, W.-C., & Chuang, M.-C. (2011). Using multi-objective genetic algorithm for partner selection in green supply chain problems. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 4244–4253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zimmermann, H.-J. (1976). Description and optimization of fuzzy systems. International Journal of General Systems, 2, 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zimmermann, H. J. (1978). Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmet Çalık
    • 1
  • Turan Paksoy
    • 2
  • Sandra Huber
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of International Trade and LogisticsKTO Karatay UniversityKonyaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Industrial EngineeringKonya Technical UniversityKonyaTurkey
  3. 3.Logistics Management DepartmentHelmut-Schmidt-University/University of the Federal Armed Forces HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations