The Impact of Coevolution and Abstention on the Emergence of Cooperation
This paper explores the Coevolutionary Optional Prisoner’s Dilemma (COPD) game, which is a simple model to coevolve game strategy and link weights of agents playing the Optional Prisoner’s Dilemma game, which is also known as the Prisoner’s Dilemma with voluntary participation. A number of Monte Carlo simulations are performed to investigate the impacts of the COPD game on the emergence of cooperation. Results show that the coevolutionary rules enable cooperators to survive and even dominate, with the presence of abstainers in the population playing a key role in the protection of cooperators against exploitation from defectors. We observe that in adverse conditions such as when the initial population of abstainers is too scarce/abundant, or when the temptation to defect is very high, cooperation has no chance of emerging. However, when the simple coevolutionary rules are applied, cooperators flourish.
KeywordsOptional Prisoner’s Dilemma game Voluntary participation Evolutionary game theory
This work was supported by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq-Brazil). Grant number: 234913/20142.
- 3.Cardinot, M., Gibbons, M., O’Riordan, C., Griffith, J.: Simulation of an optional strategy in the prisoner’s dilemma in spatial and non-spatial environments. From Animals to Animats 14 (SAB 2016), pp. 145–156. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
- 4.Cardinot, M., Griffith, J., O’Riordan, C.: Cyclic dominance in the spatial coevolutionary optional prisoner’s dilemma game. In: Greene, D., Namee, B.M., Ross, R. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science 2016. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1751, pp. 33–44. Dublin, Ireland (2016)Google Scholar
- 5.Cardinot, M., O’Riordan, C., Griffith, J.: The optional prisoner’s dilemma in a spatial environment: coevolving game strategy and link weights. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Computational Intelligence (IJCCI 2016), pp. 86–93 (2016)Google Scholar
- 6.Chen, X., Wang, L.: Promotion of cooperation induced by appropriate payoff aspirations in a small-world networked game. Phys. Rev. E 77, 017103 (2008)Google Scholar
- 7.Fisher, L.: Rock, Paper, Scissors: Game Theory in Everyday Life. Basic Books, New York (2008)Google Scholar
- 12.Huang, K., Zheng, X., Li, Z., Yang, Y.: Understanding cooperative behavior based on the coevolution of game strategy and link weight. Sci. Rep. 5, 14783 (2015)Google Scholar
- 17.Szabó, G., Hauert, C.: Evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma games with voluntary participation. Phys. Rev. E 66, 062903 (2002)Google Scholar
- 23.Zimmermann, M.G., Eguíluz, V.M., San Miguel, M.: Coevolution of dynamical states and interactions in dynamic networks. Phys. Rev. E 69, 065102 (2004)Google Scholar