Advertisement

Posthumanism’s Material Problem

  • Neil H. Kessler
Chapter
Part of the AESS Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies and Sciences Series book series (AESS)

Abstract

Several areas of posthumanism and new materialism necessitate critique. First, Deleuzian becoming as a basis for materialist posthumanism contains several contradictions and too much uncertainty about its particular material processes. Second, the material ontology of posthumanism is predicated on an analysis of Cartesian dualism that erroneously rejects the more-than-material metaphysical category in order to move humans out of it. The correct interpretation is that a non-clerical, more-than-material ontological category has always existed. Therefore, more-than-human beings should be reinstalled in it like they were in the time before the Enlightenment. Third, posthumanist notions of human-nature relational “asymmetry” as a means of liberating more-than-human beings from humanism instead perpetuate dualist, old materialist hierarchies that leave humans as relationally superior. Fourth, Karen Barad’s agential realism positions relations as ontologically precedent to relata, which is logically untenable. Finally, though agential realisms has significant strengths, it negates human and more-than-human Selves-in-relation as ontologically basic.

Keywords

Posthumanism Becoming-animal Deleuzian becoming Deleuze Cartesian dualism Human exceptionalism Agential realism Relational asymmetry Karen Barad Individual-in-relation 

References

  1. Anderson, K. (2014). Mind over matter? On decentering the human in Human Geography. Cultural Geographies, 21(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, J. (2010). A vitalist stopover on the way to a new materialism. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 47–69). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braidotti, R. (2006). Posthuman, all too human: Towards a new process ontology. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7–8), 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braidotti, R. (2009). Animals, anomalies, and inorganic others. PMLA, 124(2), 526–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brembs, B. (2011). Towards a scientific concept of free will as a biological trait: Spontaneous actions and decision-making in invertebrates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 278(1707), 930–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buber, M. (2003). Between man and man. (R. Gregor-Smith Trans.). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1947).Google Scholar
  9. Bulbulia, J. (2004). The cognitive and evolutionary psychology of religion. Biology and Philosophy, 19(5), 655–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chandler, D. (2013). The world of attachment? The post-humanist challenge to freedom and necessity. Millennium, 41(3), 516–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). Introducing the new materialisms. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 1–43). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cudworth, E., & Hobden, S. (2015). Liberation for straw dogs? Old materialism, new materialism, and the challenge of an emancipatory posthumanism. Globalizations, 12(1), 134–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, rationality and the human brain. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
  14. De Corte, B. J., Navarro, V. M., & Wasserman, E. A. (2017). Non-cortical magnitude coding of space and time by pigeons. Current Biology, 27(23), R1264–R1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ferrando, F. (2013). Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialisms. Existenz, 8(2), 26–32.Google Scholar
  17. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social cognition: From brains to culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foster, J. B. (2000). Marx’s ecology: Materialism and nature. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  19. Geary, D. C. (2005). The origin of mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gerhardt, U. (2002). Talcott parsons: An intellectual biography. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hallward, P. (2006). Out of this world: Deleuze and the philosophy of creation. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  22. Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hobbes, T. (2004/1651). Leviathan, or, the matter, forme, & power of a common-wealth ecclesiasticall and civill. New York: Barnes and Noble Books.Google Scholar
  25. Hoffman, E. (1992). Visions of innocence: Spiritual and inspirational experiences of childhood. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  26. Jenkins, S. (2012). Returning the ethical and political to animal studies. Hypatia, 27(3), 504–510.Google Scholar
  27. Kropotkin, P. A. (1902). Mutual aid, a factor of evolution. New York: McClure Phillips & Co.Google Scholar
  28. Leary, M. R., & Buttermore, N. R. (2003). The evolution of the human self: Tracing the natural history of self-awareness. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33(4), 365–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lorimer, J. (2012). Multinatural geographies for the Anthropocene. Progress in Human Geography, 36(5), 593–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  31. Midgley, M. (2004). The myths we live by. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics & moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  33. Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Peters, J. F. (2013). Near sets: An introduction. Mathematics in Computer Science, 7(1), 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pickering, A. (1993). The mangle of practice: Agency and emergence in the sociology of science. American Journal of Sociology, 99(3), 559–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Sampson, T. D. (2012). Virality: Contagion theory in the age of networks. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schlosser, M. (2015). Agency. The Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2015 Edition). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/agency
  39. Smith, D., & Protevi, J. (2018). Gilles Deleuze. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018 Edition). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/deleuze
  40. Snaza, N., & Weaver, J. (2014). Introduction: Education and the posthumanist turn. In N. Snaza & J. Weaver (Eds.), Posthumanism and educational research (pp. 1–16). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Springer, S. P., & Deutsch, G. (1998). Left brain, right brain: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  42. Taylor, A., & Giugni, M. (2012). Common worlds: Reconceptualising inclusion in early childhood communities. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13(2), 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tomasello, M. (2009). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Twine, R. (2012). Revealing the animal-industrial complex: A concept and method for critical animal studies. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 10(1), 12–39.Google Scholar
  45. Van Dooren, T. (2014). Flight ways: Life and loss at the edge of extinction. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Warren, K. J. (1990). The power and the promise of ecological feminism. Environmental Ethics, 12(2), 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Watson, A., & Huntington, O. H. (2008). They’re here—I can feel them: The epistemic spaces of indigenous and western knowledges. Social & Cultural Geography, 9(3), 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weisberg, Z. (2009). The broken promises of monsters: Haraway, animals and the humanist legacy. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 7(2), 22–62.Google Scholar
  49. Wilson, C. (2017). Materialism, old and new, and the Party of Humanity. In S. Ellenzweig & J. H. Zammito (Eds.), The new politics of materialism (pp. 111–130). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Žižek, S. (2004). Organs without bodies: On Deleuze and consequences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neil H. Kessler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Natural Resources and the EnvironmentUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations