Advertisement

Influence of Manufacturing Errors on the Unbalance Response of Aerodynamic Foil Bearings

  • Aurelian Fatu
  • Mihai Arghir
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 60)

Abstract

The present work tackles the impact of manufacturing errors on the unbalance response of a Jeffcott rotor supported on aerodynamic foil bearings. The peculiarity of the model is the use of the Abaqus software for describing the dynamic response of the foil structure, for calculating the thin film pressures and for integrating the equations of motion of the rotor-bearing model. The numerical results show that the foil bearing without manufacturing errors and with a radial clearance of 31.8 µm is unstable for the tested operating conditions (30 krpm rotation speed, 10 N static load and G1 unbalance class). However, taking into account manufacturing errors may lead to a different result. Bump height manufacturing errors were added to the model. Five cases with random manufacturing errors but all with 10 µm standard deviation of the bump height were analyzed. In four cases, the unbalance response was a limit cycle dominated by the 0.5 Ω subsynchronous frequency. This result may explain the discrepancies between theoretical and experimental results reported up to now in the literature.

Keywords

Foil bearing Unbalance response Manufacturing errors 

References

  1. 1.
    Balducchi, F., Arghir, M., Gauthier, R.: Experimental analysis of the unbalance response of rigid rotors supported on aerodynamic foil bearings. J. Vib. Acoust. 137(6), 061014 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fatu, A., Arghir, M.: Numerical analysis of manufacturing errors on the structural stiffness of foil bearings. GT2017-63822 accepted for publication by the Journal of Gas Turbines and Power (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038042
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Miąskowski, W., Pietkiewicz, P., Żywica, G.: Modeling foil bearings. Tech. Sci. (2009).  https://doi.org/10.2478/v10022-009-0020-9
  5. 5.
    Żywica, G.: The static performance analysis of the foil bearing structure. Acta Mechanica et Automatica 5(4), 119–122 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Żywica, G.: The dynamic performance analysis of the foil bearing structure. Acta Mechanica et Automatica 7(1), 58–62 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-2013-0011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Żywica, G., Bogulicz, M., Baginski, P.: Modelling and Analysis of Rotating Systems with Gas Foil Bearings Under Transient Operating Conditions, pp. 167–173. TRIBOLOGIA 2/2017, ISSN 0208-7774 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu, J., Du, F.: Simulation of compliant bump foil journal bearing using coupled reynolds equation and finite element model method. Adv. Mater. Res. 479–481, 2499–2503 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Temis, Y.M., Temis, M.Y., Meshcheryakov, A.B.: Gas-dynamics foil bearing model. J. Frict. Wear 32(3), 212–220 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Temis, J., Temis, M., Egorov, A., Gavrilov, G.: Numerical and experimental investigation of rotor-simulator in foil gasdynamic bearings for compact gas turbine. In: Proceedings of the 9th IFToMM International Conference on Rotor Dynamics, pp. 1247–1258 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Branagan, M., Griffin, D., Goyne, C., Untaroiu, A.: Compliant gas foil bearings and analysis tools. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 138(5), 054001 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut PPRIME, UPR CNRS 3346, Université de Poitiers, ISAE ENSMAFuturoscope Chasseneuil CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations