Advertisement

California Phenomenology

  • Jeffrey YoshimiEmail author
  • Clinton TolleyEmail author
  • David Woodruff SmithEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Contributions To Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 100)

Abstract

We survey the development of “California Phenomenology”, both as a philosophical movement originating with Dagfinn Føllesdal’s formulation of a Fregean, analytic reading of Husserl in the late 1950s and 1960s, and as an evolving network of philosophers working throughout California, who have met under the auspices of several groups in a more or less continuous way since that time. We trace the history of these groups in detail, provide an overview of debates that occurred between “West Coast” approaches to Husserlian phenomenology and other approaches, and survey the broad panorama of more recent work.

Keywords

California school Husserl Føllesdal Frege Phenomenology 

References

  1. Bayne, Tim, and Michelle Montague. 2011. Cognitive Phenomenology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beyer, Christian. 1997. Hussearle’s Representationalism and the “Hypothesis of the Background”. Synthese 112: 323–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ———. 1998. Russell’s Principle Considered from Both a Neo-Fregean and a Husserlian Viewpoint.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2000. Intentionalität und Referenz. Eine sprachanalytische Studie zu Husserls transzendentaler Phänomenologie.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2001. A Neo-Husserlian Theory of Speaker’s Reference. Erkenntnis 54: 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ———. 2013. Von Bolzano zu Husserl: eine Untersuchung über den Ursprung der phänomenologischen Bedeutungslehre. Vol. 139. Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2015. Edmund Husserl. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. Summer 2015. Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab. https://plato.stanford.edu/cite.html
  8. Casebier, Allan. 1991. Film and Phenomenology: Toward a Realist Theory of Cinematic Representation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Daniel, Mano. 1992. A Bibliography of the Noema. In The Phenomenology of the Noema, Contributions to Phenomenology 10, ed. John J. Drummond and Lester Embree, 227–248. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dreyfus, Hubert. 1982. Husserl’s Perceptual Noema. In Husserl, Intentionality and Cognitive Science, 97–123. Cambridge, MA: London : MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. 1991. Being-in-the-World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1992. What Computers Still Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1999. The Primacy of Phenomenology over Logical Analysis. Philosophical Topics 27: 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dreyfus, Hubert, and Harrison Hall. 1982. Husserl Intentionality and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dreyfus, Hubert, and Mark Wrathall. 2008. A Companion to Heidegger. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Drummond, John J. 1984. Review of: Husserl and Intentionality: A Study of Mind, Meaning, and Language. Husserl Studies 1: 201–225.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01569215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. 1985. Frege and Husserl: Another Look at the Issue of Influence. Husserl Studies 2: 245–265.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00430969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ———. 1990. Husserlian Intentionality and Non-foundational Realism: Noema and Object. Vol. 4. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farber, Marvin. 1943. The Foundation of Phenomenology: Edmund Husserl and the Quest for a Rigorous Science of Philosophy, vol. 9. Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Fiocco, M. Oreste. 2017. Knowing Things in Themselves: Mind, Brentano and Acquaintance. Grazer Philosophische Studien 94: 332–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Føllesdal, Dagfinn. 1958. Husserl Und Frege Ein Beitrag Zur Beleuchtung der Entstehung der Phänomenologischen Philosophie.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 1969. Husserl’s Notion of Noema. The Journal of Philosophy 66: 680–687.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2024451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ———. 1982. Husserl’s Theory of Perception. In Husserl, Intentionality and Cognitive Science, ed. Hubert Dreyfus and Harrison Hall, 93–96. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 1994. Husserl and Frege: A Contribution to Elucidating the Origins of Phenomenological Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Ford, Jason. 2008. Attention and the New Sceptics. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15: 59–86.Google Scholar
  26. Ford, Jason, and David Woodruff Smith. 2006. Consciousness, Self, and Attention. In Self-Representational Approaches to Consciousness, ed. Uriah Kriegel and Kenneth Williford, 353–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gurwitsch, Aron. 1964. Field of Consciousness. Vol. 2. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Harvey, Charles W. 1986. Husserl’s Phenomenology and Possible Worlds Semantics: A Reexamination. Husserl Studies 3: 191–207.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00211004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hickerson, Ryan. 2007. The History of Intentionality: Theories of Consciousness from Brentano to Husserl. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 2008. Twardowski and Representationalism. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 4.  https://doi.org/10.4148/biyclc.v4i0.127.
  31. ———. 2009. Neglecting the Question of Being: Heidegger’s Argument Against Husserl. Inquiry 52: 574–595.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00201740903377842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hopkins, Burt C. 2013. Manifold, Intuition, and Synthesis in Kant and Husserl. Logical Analysis & History of Philosophy/Philosophiegeschichte und Logische Analyse, 16.Google Scholar
  33. Hopp, Walter. 2007. Perception and Knowledge: A Phenomenological Account. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. ———. 2008. Husserl, Phenomenology, and Foundationalism. Inquiry 51: 194–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Husserl, Edmund. 1994. Early Writings in the Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 2012. Philosophy of Arithmetic: Psychological and Logical Investigations with Supplementary Texts from 1887–1901, vol. 10. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Ingarden, Roman, and Arthur Szylewicz. 2013. Controversy over the Existence of the World: Volume I. 1st ed. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  38. Kasmier, David. 2003. Husserl’s Theory of A Priori Knowledge: A Response to the Failure of Contemporary Rationalism. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2010. A Defense of Husserl’s Method of Free Variation.Google Scholar
  40. Keller, Pierre. 1999. Husserl and Heidegger on Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kersey, Ethel. 1983. The Noema, Husserlian and Beyond: An Annotated Bibliography of English Language Sources. Philosophy Research Archives 9: 62–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kidd, Chad. 2011. Phenomenal Consciousness with Infallible Self-Representation. Philosophical Studies 152: 361–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Langsdorf, L. 1985. Review of H. Dreyfus (ed.), Husserl, Intentionality, and Cognitive Science. Husserl Studies 2: 303–311.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00430969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Livingston, Paul. 2002. Husserl and Schlick on the Logical Form of Experience. Synthese 132: 239–272.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020378731241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. ———. 2003. Thinking and Being: Heidegger and Wittgenstein on Machination and Lived-Experience. Inquiry 46: 324–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. ———. 2005. Functionalism and Logical Analysis. In Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind, ed. David Woodruff Smith and Amie L. Thomasson, vol. 19. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  47. ———. 2012. The Politics of Logic: Badiou, Wittgenstein, and the Consequences of Formalism. Vol. 27. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. ———. 2013. Phenomenal Concepts and the Problem of Acquaintance. Journal of Consciousness Studies 20: 71–92.Google Scholar
  49. ———. 2017. Presentation and the Ontology of Consciousness. Grazer Philosophische Studien 94: 301–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Martin, Wayne. 1997. Idealism and objectivity: understanding Fichte’s Jena project. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. ———. 2005. Husserl and the Logic of Consciousness. In Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind, ed. David Woodruff Smith and Amie Lynn Thomasson, 203. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. ———. 2006. Theories of Judgment: Psychology, Logic, Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. ———. 2011. The Judgment of Adam. In Art and Phenomenology, ed. Joseph Perry. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Martin, Wayne, and Ryan Hickerson. 2011. Mental Capacity and the Applied Phenomenology of Judgement. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12: 195–214.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-011-9242-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Matherne, Samantha. 2012. The Inclusive Interpretation of Kant’s Aesthetic Ideas. The British Journal of Aesthetics 53: 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. ———. Forthcoming. Kantian Themes in Merleau-Ponty’s Theory of Perception. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie.Google Scholar
  57. Mathiesen, Kay. 2005. Collective Consciousness. In Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind, 235. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McIntyre, Ronald. 1982. Intending and Referring. In Husserl, Intentionality and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  59. ———. 1984. Searle on Intentionality. Inquiry 27: 468–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. ———. 1986. Husserl and the Representational Theory of Mind. Topoi 5: 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. ———. 2012. “We-Subjectivity”: Husserl on Community and Communal Constitution. In Intersubjectivity and Objectivity in Adam Smith and Edmund Husserl: A Collection of Essays, vol 8, 61. Frankfurt: Ontos.Google Scholar
  62. McKenna, William. 1985. Review of I. Miller, Husserl, Perception, and Temporal Awareness. Husserl Studies 2: 291–299.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00430969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Miller, Izchak. 1984. Husserl, Perception, and Temporal Awareness. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  64. Montague, Michelle. 2017. What Kind of Awareness Is Awareness of Awareness? Grazer Philosophische Studien 94: 359–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Olafson, Frederick A. 1967. Principles and Persons. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  66. ———. 1991. Heidegger and the Philosophy of Mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  67. ———. 1994. Heidegger à la Wittgenstein or “Coping”with Professor Dreyfus. Inquiry 37: 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. ———. 1995. What Is a Human Being?: A Heideggerian View. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pitt, David. 2004. The Phenomenology of Cognition or What Is It Like to Think That P? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69: 1–36.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2004.tb00382.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schear, Joseph. 2013. Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. ——— forthcoming. Horizons of Intentionality: From Husserl to Heidegger. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Schwab, Martin. 1986. The Rejection of Origin: Derrida’s Interpretation of Husserl. Topoi 5: 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. ———. 2000. Escape from the Image: Deleuze’s Image-Ontology. In The Brain is the Screen: Deleuze and the Philosophy of Cinema, ed. Gregory Flaxman, 109–39. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  74. Searle, John. 2005. The Phenomenological Illusion. Schriftenreihe-Wittgenstein Gesellschaft 34: 17–38.Google Scholar
  75. Shim, Michael K. 2005. The Duality of Non-conceptual Content in Husserl’s Phenomenology of Perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4: 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. ———. 2011. Representationalism and Husserlian Phenomenology. Husserl Studies 27: 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Siewert, Charles. 1998. The Significance of Consciousness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. ———. 2005. Attention and Sensorimotor Intentionality. In Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind, 270. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  79. ———. 2011. Phenomenal Thought. In Cognitive Phenomenology, 236–267. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Silverman, Hugh J. 1980. Phenomenology. Social Research 47: 704–720.Google Scholar
  81. Simons, Peter. 2017. Pointers: The Missing Link Between Intentionalty and Reference. Grazer Philosophische Studien 94: 381–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Smith, David Woodruff. 1981. Indexical Sense and Reference. Synthese 49: 101–127.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. ———. 1983. Husserl’s Philosophy of Mind. In Philosophy of Mind/Philosophie de l’esprit, Contemporary philosophy/La Philosophie Contemporaine 4, ed. Guttorm Fløistad, 249–286. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Smith, David W. 1989. The Circle of Acquaintance, vol. 205. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  85. ———. 2013. Husserl. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Smith, David Woodruff, and Ronald McIntyre. 1971. Intentionality via Intensions. Journal of Philosophy 68: 541–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. ———. 1982. Husserl and Intentionality: A Study of Mind, Meaning, and Language. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Smith, Barry, and David Woodruff Smith. 1995. The Cambridge Companion to Husserl. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Smith, David Woodruff, and Amie Lynn Thomasson. 2005. Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Spiegelberg, Herbert. 1973. Husserl’s Way into Phenomenology for Americans: A Letter and Its Sequel. In Phenomenology: Continuation and Criticism, 168–191. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  91. Stolorow, Robert. 2015. World, Affectivity, Trauma: Heidegger and Post-Cartesian Psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  92. Stone, Abraham. 2006. Heidegger and Carnap on the Overcoming of Metaphysics. In Martin Heidegger, 217–244. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  93. ———. 2010. On the Sources and Implications of Carnap’s Der Raum. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41: 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Thomasson, Amie L. 1996. Fiction and Intentionality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56: 277–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. ———. 1999. Fiction and Metaphysics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  96. ———. 2002. Phenomenology and the Development of Analytic Philosophy. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 40: 115–142.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2002.tb01926.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. ———. 2003. Introspection and Phenomenological Method. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2: 239–254.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000004927.79475.46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. ———. 2005. First-Person Knowledge in Phenomenology. In Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind, ed. David Woodruff Smith and Amie L. Thomasson, 115–138. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. ———. 2017. Husserl on Essences: A Reconstruction and Rehabilitation. Grazer Philosophische Studien 94: 436–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Thomson, Iain. 2005. Heidegger on Ontotheology: Technology and the Politics of Education. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. ———. 2011. Heidegger, Art, and Postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Tieszen, Richard. 1989. Review of H. R. Otto and J. A. Tuedio (eds.), Perspectives on Mind. Husserl Studies 6: 176–186.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00430969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. ———. 1992. Kurt Godel and Phenomenology. Philosophy of Science 59: 176–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. ———. 2005. Phenomenology, Logic, and the Philosophy of Mathematics. Vol. 203. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. ———. 2011. After Gödel: Platonism and Rationalism in Mathematics and Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Todes, Samuel. 2001. Body and World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tolley, Clinton. 2010. Entre sens et non-sens: Benoist sur l’explication réaliste de l’intentionalité. Philosophiques 37: 491–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. ———. 2012a. Bolzano and Kant on the Nature of Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 33: 307–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. ———. 2012b. Bolzano and Kant on the Place of Subjectivity in a Wissenschaftslehre. Grazer Philosophische Studien 85: 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. ———. 2014. Bolzano and Kant on Space and Outer Intuition. In The New Anti-Kant, 157. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  111. ———. 2017. Husserl’s Philosophy of the Categories and His Development Toward Absolute Idealism. Grazer Philosophische Studien 94: 460–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. ———. forthcoming. Idealism and the Question of Truth. In Oxford Handbook on Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  113. Tragesser, Robert S. 1977. Phenomenology and Logic. Ithaca: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  114. ———. 1984. Husserl and Realism in Logic and Mathematics. Cambridge: CUP Archive.Google Scholar
  115. Ueberweg, Friedrich, Karl Praechter, Max Frischeisen-Köhler, and Traugott Konstantin Oesterreich. 1927. Friedrich Ueberwegs Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie. Berlin: E.S. Mittler.Google Scholar
  116. Walsh, Philip. 2014. Empathy, Embodiment, and the Unity of Expression. Topoi 33: 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. ———. 2017. Motivation and Horizon: Phenomenal Intentionality in Husserl. Grazer Philosophische Studien 94: 410–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Walsh, Phillip, and Jeff Yoshimi. 2018. Philosophy of mind in the phenomenological tradition. In History of Philosophy of Mind in the 20th Century. https://www.amazon.com/Philosophy-Mind-Twentieth-Twenty-First-Centuries/dp/1138243973 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Welton, Donn. 1983. The Origins of Meaning: A Critical Study of the Thresholds of Husserlian Phenomenology. Distributors for the U.S. And Canada, Kluwer Boston.Google Scholar
  120. ———. 2000. The Other Husserl: The Horizons of Transcendental Phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  121. Westmoreland, Peter. 2010. Rousseau’s Phenomenological Model for the Co-Constitution of Self and World. In Phenomenology 2010: Selected Essays from North America, Phenomenology Within Philosophy, ed. Michael Barber, and Thomas J. Nenon. Bucharest: Zeta Books.Google Scholar
  122. Willard, Dallas. 1986. Logic and the Objectivity of Knowledge: A Study of Husserl’s Early Philosophy.Google Scholar
  123. ———. 1988. RS Tragesser, “Husserl and Realism in Logic and Mathematics”.Google Scholar
  124. Wrathall, Mark A. 2010. Heidegger and Unconcealment: Truth, Language, and History. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Yoshimi, Jeff. 2009. Husserl’s Theory of Belief and the Heideggerean Critique. Husserl Studies 25: 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. ———. 2011. Phenomenology and Connectionism. Frontiers in Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 2: 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. ———. 2012. Two Dynamical Themes in Husserl. In Being in Time: Dynamical Models of Phenomenal Experience, ed. Shimon Edelman, Tomer Fekete, and Neta Zach, vol. 88, 165–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins publishing Company.Google Scholar
  128. ———. 2017. The Phenomenology of Problem Solving. Grazer Philosophische Studien 94: 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Yoshimi, Jeff, and David W. Vinson. 2015. Extending Gurwitsch’s Field theory of Consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 34: 104–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.03.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of California MercedMercedUSA
  2. 2.University of California San DiegoSan DiegoUSA
  3. 3.University of California IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations