Advertisement

Dynamic Creativity: Influential Theory, Public Discourse, and Generative Possibility

  • Carol A. MullenEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Creativity Theory and Action in Education book series (CTAE, volume 4)

Abstract

This conceptual essay introduces dynamic creativity, bridging with influential theory, public discourse, and generative possibility. The concept of dynamic creativity grows out of literature referring to dynamics of creativity—both educational and cultural. Creative rhetoric in public discourse is also taken up for its global reach and especially because it assigns internationally competitive and economic functions to creativity. Discussion moves to select influential creativity theories—Beghetto and Kaufman’s 4-C Model of Creativity and Csikszentmihalyi’s systems model of creativity. A creative synthesis is ventured of these theories, foregrounding their dynamic possibilities, with graphical representation. A fifth C—Hidden-c—extends the theorizing about creativity with particular reference to Corazza’s theory of dynamic creativity while demonstrating dynamic creativity in a Chinese learning context. Illustrations of creativity reveal Canada and China’s different ways of relating to the high-stakes testing ethos and pressure to dominate on the world stage as creative innovators. The role of adopter and shaper of creativity models informs the author’s approach to this eclectic, layered work. Implications for continuing the conversation about dynamic creativity end this writing.

Keywords

Beghetto and Kaufman Corazza Creativity Csikszentmihalyi Culture Dynamic creativity Education 4-C model of creativity Hidden-c Self-belief Systems  model 

References

  1. Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball, M. (2016, September 2). Donald Trump and the politics of fear. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/09/donald-trump-and-the-politics-of-fear/498116
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  4. BBC. (2017, August 3). How Canada became an education superpower. Education News. Retrieved from http://www.educationviews.org/canada-education-superpower
  5. Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for mini-c creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beghetto, R. A. (2016). Creative openings in the social interactions of teaching. Creativity Theories–Research–Applications, 3(2), 261–273.  https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2016-0017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Toward untangling creative self-beliefs. In J. C. Kaufman (Ed.), Creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity (pp. 3–22). London: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boily, P., Chapdelaine, N., Hartley, M., Kent, L., Suurkask, K., & Wong, J. C. (2014). Creativity unleashed: Taking innovation out of the laboratory and into the labour force. Retrieved from http://www.actioncanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/AC-TF3-Creativity-Report-EN-web.pdf
  10. Brown, J. L., & Moffett, C. A. (1999). The hero’s journey: How educators can transform schools and improve learning. Alexandria: ASCD.Google Scholar
  11. Collard, P., & Looney, J. (2014). Nurturing creativity in education. European Journal of Education, 49(3), 348–364.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conference Board of Canada. (2008, August). Valuing culture: Measuring and understanding Canada’s creative economy. Ottawa: Author. Retrieved from http://www.conferenceboard.ca/e-library/abstract.aspx?did=2671
  13. Corazza, G. E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 258–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Craft, A., Cremin, T., Burnard, P., Dragovic, T., & Chappell, K. (2012a). Possibility thinking: Culminative studies of an evidence-based concept driving creativity? International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 41(5), 538–556.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2012.656671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Craft, A., McConnon, L., & Matthews, A. (2012b). Creativity and child-initiated play: Fostering possibility thinking in four-year-olds. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(1), 48–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cropley, D., & Cropley, A. (2010). Functional creativity: “Products” and the generation of effective novelty. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 301–317). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: The psychology of discovery and invention. London: HarperPerennial.Google Scholar
  19. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Culture. (2017). Merriam-Webster. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/culture
  21. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Perigee Books.Google Scholar
  22. Dynamic. (2017). Wiktionary. Retrieved from https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dynamic
  23. Eisner, E. W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Eisner, E. W. (2004). What does it mean to say that a school is doing well? In D. J. Flinders & S. J. Thornton (Eds.), The curriculum studies reader (2nd ed., pp. 297–305). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Ferdig, M. A., & Ludema, J. D. (2005). Transformative interactions: Qualities of conversation that heighten the vitality of self-organizing change. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 15, 171–207.Google Scholar
  26. Gardner, J. W. (1963). Self-renewal: The individual and the innovative society. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  27. Gardner, H. (2011). Truth, beauty, and goodness reframed: Educating for the virtues in the age of truthiness and Twitter. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  28. Glăveanu, V. P., & Tanggaard, L. (2014). Creativity, identity, and representation: Towards a socio-cultural theory of creative identity. New Ideas in Psychology, 34, 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hennessey, B. A. (2013). Foreword. In A.-G. Tan (Ed.), Creativity, talent, and excellence (pp. vii–vix). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Heyl, J. D. (2014). Globalization and the U.S. university: Reactions, trends, and a teachable moment. In S. Harris & J. Mixon (Eds.), Building cultural community through global educational leadership (pp. 254–266). Ypsilanti: NCPEA.Google Scholar
  31. Hunt, L. (2014). Writing history in the global era. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  32. Hunter, G. S. (2013). Out think: How innovative leaders drive exceptional outcomes. Mississauga: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Ibbitson, J. (2014, July 2). Why is Canada the most tolerant country in the world? Luck. Globe and Mail. Retrieved from https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/why-is-canada-the-most-tolerant-country-in-the-world-luck/article19427921
  34. Jacobs, B. A. (2006). Race manners for the 21st Century: Navigating the minefield between Black and White Americans in an age of fear. New York: Arcade Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Johnson, S. (2010). Where good ideas come from: The natural history of innovation. New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  36. Johnston, D., & Jenkins, T. (2017). Ingenious: How Canadian innovators made the world smarter, smaller, kinder, safer, healthier, wealthier, and happier. New York: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
  37. Kahl, C. H., & Hansen, H. (2015). Simulating creativity from a systems perspective. CRESY Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18(1), 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.2640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (2010). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Keller-Mathers, S., & Murdock, M. (1999). Research support for a conceptual organization of creativity. In A. Fishkin, B. Cramond, & P. Olszewski-Kubelius (Eds.), Investigating creativity in youth (pp. 49–71). Cresskill: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lee, J. C. K., & Pang, N. S. K. (2011). Educational leadership in China: Contexts and issues. Frontiers of Education in China, 6(3), 331–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Li, Q., & Gerstl-Pepin, C. (Eds.). (2014). Survival of the fittest: The shifting contours of higher education in China and the United States. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  43. Mullen, C. A. (2017a). Creativity and education in China: Paradox and possibilities for an era of accountability. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mullen, C. A. (2017b). Creativity in Chinese schools: Perspectival frames of paradox and possibility. International Journal of Chinese Education, 6(1), 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mullen, C. A. (2018). Creative learning: Paradox or possibility in China’s restrictive preservice teacher classrooms? Action in Teacher Education, 40, 186–202. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Neber, H., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2013). Creativity and problem-based learning (PBL): A neglected relation. In A.-G. Tan (Ed.), Creativity, talent, and excellence (pp. 43–56). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Cultural influences on artistic creativity and its evaluation. International Journal of Psychology, 36(4), 225–241.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590143000036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Niu, W., Zhang, J. X., & Yang, Y. (2007). Deductive reasoning and creativity: A cross-cultural study. Psychological Reports, 100(2), 509–519  https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.100.2.509-519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Robinson, K. (2015). Creative schools: The grassroots revolution that’s transforming education. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  51. Saul, J. R. (2008). A fair country: Telling truths about Canada. Toronto: Viking Canada.Google Scholar
  52. Sawyer, K. (2012). Extending sociocultural theory to group creativity. Vocations and Learning, 5, 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schwab, J. (2004). The practical: A language for curriculum. In D. J. Flinders & S. J. Thornton (Eds.), The curriculum studies reader (2nd ed., pp. 103–117). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Staats, L. K. (2011). The cultivation of creativity in the Chinese culture—past, present, and future. Journal of Strategic Leadership, 3(1), 45–53.Google Scholar
  55. Stacey, R. D. (1992). Managing the unknowable: Strategic boundaries between order and chaos in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  56. Starr, J. B. (2010). Understanding China: A guide to China’s economy, history, and political culture (3rd ed.). New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  57. Stasis. (2017). Merriam-Webster. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/stasis
  58. Sternberg, R. J. (2006). Introduction. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The international handbook of creativity (pp. 1–9). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Stoeger, H. (2003). Learning as a creative process. In A.-G. Tan (Ed.), Creativity, talent, and excellence (pp. 1–11). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  60. Tan, A.-G. (2013). Psychology of cultivating creativity in teaching and learning. In A.-G. Tan (Ed.), Creativity, talent, and excellence (pp. 27–42). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wheatley, M. J. (1992). Leadership and the new science: Learning about organization from an orderly universe. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  62. Wheatley, M. J. (2017). Who do we choose to be? Facing reality, claiming leadership, restoring sanity. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  63. Wheatley, M. J., & Kellner-Rogers, M. (1996). A simpler way. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  64. Wierzbicki, A. P., & Nakamori, Y. (2006). Creative space: Models of creative processes for the knowledge civilization age. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Woetzel, J., & Towson, J. (2013). The 1 hour China book. Cayman Islands: Towson Group LLC.Google Scholar
  66. World Economic Forum. (2013). The global competitiveness report: 2013–2014. Geneva: Author. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2013-14.pdf
  67. Xu, L. (2012). The role of teachers’ beliefs in the language teaching–learning process. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(7), 1397–1402.  https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.7.1397-1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhao, Y. (2014). Who’s afraid of the big bad dragon? Thousand Oaks: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  69. Zimmermann, K. A. (2015). What is culture? Definition of culture. Retrieved from https://www.livescience.com/21478-what-is-culture-definition-of-culture.html

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Virginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations