Advertisement

The Dynamic Definition of Creativity: Implications for Creativity Assessment

  • Lindsey CarruthersEmail author
  • Rory MacLean
Chapter
Part of the Creativity Theory and Action in Education book series (CTAE, volume 4)

Abstract

Within this chapter, we consider the dynamic definition of creativity within a practical context, with roots in psychological measurement. A discussion of some of the existing measures of creativity is provided, with an attempt to assimilate them to the dynamic definition of creativity, as proposed by Corazza (Creat Res J 28:258–267, 2016). In most cases, some adaptations to the measures are required in order to acknowledge new criteria, such as creative inconclusiveness, and some ideas are presented here for future researchers to consider. Ultimately, it is argued that the dynamic definition of creativity is timely, necessary, and an important step in developing the field of creativity research.

Keywords

Dynamic creativity Creativity assessment methods Measuring creativity 

References

  1. Agnoli, S., Corazza, G. E., & Runco, M. A. (2016). Estimating creativity with a multiple-measurement approach within scientific and artistic domains. Creativity Research Journal, 28(2), 171–176.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1162475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ansburg, P. I., & Hill, K. (2003). Creative and analytic thinkers differ in their use of attentional resources. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1141–1152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00104-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baer, J. (1996). Does artistic creativity decline during elementary school? Psychological Reports, 78, 927–930.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1996.78.3.927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  7. Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Batey, M. (2007). A psychometric investigation of everyday creativity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University College, London.Google Scholar
  9. Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447–457.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1804_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Towards untangling creative self-beliefs. In M. Karwowski & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity (pp. 3–22). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(4), 634–639.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37–50.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Colangelo, N., Kerr, B., Hallowell, K., Huesman, R., & Gaeth, J. (1992). The Iowa Inventiveness Inventory: Toward a measure of mechanical inventiveness. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 157–163.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419209534429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corazza, G. E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 258–267.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1195627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diedrich, J., Jauk, E., Silvia, P. J., Gredlein, J. M., Neubauer, A. C., & Benedek, M. (2017). Assessment of real-life creativity: The inventory of creative activities and achievements (ICAA). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dollinger, S. J. (2003). Need for uniqueness, need for cognition, and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37(2), 99–116.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2003.tb00828.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dollinger, S. J., Burke, P. A., & Gump, N. A. (2007). Creativity and values. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2–3), 91–103.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410701395028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fodor, E. M. (1999). Subclinical inclination toward manic-depression and creative performance on the Remote Associates Test. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(6), 1273–1283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00076-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Hocevar, D. (1979, April).The development of the Creative Behavior Inventory (CBI). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 170 350).Google Scholar
  21. Hocevar, D. (1980). Intelligence, divergent thinking, and creativity. Intelligence, 4, 25–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(80)90004-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 53–75). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jauk, E., Benedek, M., Dunst, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 41, 212–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). The road to creative achievement: A latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.194.
  25. Jaussi, K. S., Randel, A. E., & Dionne, S. D. (2007). I am, I think I can, and I do: The role of personal identity, self-efficacy, and cross-application of experiences in creativity at work. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2–3), 247–258.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410701397339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kasof, J. (1997). Creativity and breadth of attention. Creativity Research Journal, 10(4), 303–315.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1004_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 298–308.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008a). Essentials of creativity assessment. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cole, J. C., & Sexton, J. D. (2008b). A comparison of expert and nonexpert raters using the consensual assessment technique. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 171–178.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802059929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaufman, J. C., Cole, J. C., & Baer, J. (2009a). The construct of creativity: A structural model for self-reported creativity ratings. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(2), 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaufman, J. C., Waterstreet, M. A., Ailabouni, H. S., Whitcomb, H. J., Roe, A. K., & Riggs, M. (2009b). Personality and self-perceptions of creativity across domains. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 29(3), 193–209.  https://doi.org/10.2190/IC.29.3.c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Keating, D. P. (1978). A search for social intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(2), 218.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.70.2.218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuhn, J.-T., & Holling, H. (2009). Exploring the nature of divergent thinking: A multilevel analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 116–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee, C. S., Huggins, A. C., & Therriault, D. J. (2014). A measure of creativity or intelligence? Examining internal and external structure validity evidence of the Remote Associates Test. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 446–460.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. Psychological Monographs, 54(6), i–95.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mar, R. A., DeYoung, C. G., Higgins, D. M., & Peterson, J. B. (2006). Self-liking and self-competence separate self-evaluation from self-deception: Associations with personality, ability, and achievement. Journal of Personality, 74(4), 1047–1078.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00402.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McCutcheon, L. E., Ashe, D. D., Houran, J., & Maltby, J. (2003). A cognitive profile of individuals who tend to worship celebrities. The Journal of Psychology, 137(4), 309–322.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980309600616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McFarlin, D. B., & Blascovich, J. (1984). On the Remote Associates Test (RAT) as an alternative to illusory performance feedback: A methodological note. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 5(3), 223–229.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0503_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220–232.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mendelsohn, G. A. (1976). Associative and attentional processes in creative performance. Journal of Personality, 44, 341–369.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1976.tb00127.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ohlsson, S. (1992). Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena. Advances in the Psychology of Thinking, 1, 1–44.Google Scholar
  42. Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 393–400.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schmajuk, N., Aziz, D. R., & Bates, M. J. B. (2009). Attentional-associative interactions in creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 92–103.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802633574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Silvia, P. J., Wigert, B., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Assessing creativity with self-report scales: A review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 19–34.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, creativity, and leadership: Historiometric inquiries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simonton, D. K. (1997a). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104(1), 66–89.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Simonton, D. K. (1997b). Historiometric studies of creative genius. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 3–28). Creskill: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  49. Simonton, D. K. (1998a). Fickle fashion versus immortal fame: Transhistorical assessments of creative products in the opera house. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 198–210.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Simonton, D. K. (1998b). Masterpieces in music and literature: Historiometric inquiries. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 103–110.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1102_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith, K. A., Huber, D. E., & Vul, E. (2013). Multiply-constrained semantic search in the Remote Associates Test. Cognition, 128(1), 64–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Taft, R., & Rossiter, J. R. (1966). The Remote Associates Test: Divergent or convergent thinking? Psychological Reports, 19, 1313–1314.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1966.19.3f.1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential, antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3069429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Torrance, E. P. (1966). The torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual research edition. verbal tests, forms A and B, figural tests, forms A and B. Princeton: Personnel Press.Google Scholar
  55. Torrance, E. P. (1990). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Manual for scoring and interpreting results. Bensenville: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc..Google Scholar
  56. Torrance, E. P., Ball, O. E., & Safter, H. T. (1992). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Streamlined scoring guide, figural A and B. Bensenville: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc..Google Scholar
  57. White, H. A., & Shah, P. (2011). Creative style and achievement in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 673–677.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wolfradt, U., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: Personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 15, 297–310.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Applied SciencesEdinburgh Napier UniversityEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations