Advertisement

Information Literacy, Digital Capability, and Individual Agency

  • Bill Johnston
  • Sheila MacNeill
  • Keith Smyth
Chapter
Part of the Digital Education and Learning book series (DEAL)

Abstract

In this chapter the subject field of Information Literacy is reviewed and related to holistic themes of digital capability, agency, and personhood as preferred characteristics of the digital university. Information in society (Buckland, Information and society. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/London, 2017) and Information Literacy in the curriculum (Anderson and Johnston, From information literacy to social epistemology: insights from psychology. Chandos Publishing, Kidlington, 2016; Webber and Johnston, J Inf Lit 11(1), 2017) are discussed as being at the intersection of economy, education, and democracy and not simply as a set of information and digital skills. Information Literacy is a key quadrant of the Matrix detailed in Chap.  3; however it is seen as marginal in university academic development and in need of significant attention at all levels of digital university organisation. Related literacies—digital and media—are discussed and related to Information Literacy (Koltay 2011). The UNESCO programme of Media and Information Literacy is proposed as an emerging focus for curriculum development work on critiques of the globalisation of the information industry and the implications of monopolistic ownership for democracy.

References

  1. Anderson, A., & Johnston, B. (2016). From Information Literacy to Social Epistemology: Insights from Psychology. Kidlington: Chandos Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Association of College and Research Libraries. (2015). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. http.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework. Last Accessed 3 Feb 2017.
  3. Baer, A. (2013). Critical Information Literacy in the College Classroom: Exploring Scholarly Knowledge Production Through the Digital Humanities. In L. Gregory & S. Higgins (Eds.), Information Literacy and Social Justice: Radical Professional Praxis (pp. 99–119). Los Angeles: Library Juice Press.Google Scholar
  4. Boon, S., Johnston, B., & Webber, S. (2007). A Phenomenographic Study of English Faculty’s Conceptions of Information Literacy. Journal of Documentation, 63(2), 204–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boutang, Y. M. (2012). Cognitive Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  6. Bruce, C. (1997). The Seven Faces of Information Literacy. Adelaide: AUSLIB Press.Google Scholar
  7. Buckland, M. (2017). Information and Society. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chatterton, P., & Rebbeck, G. (2015). Technology for Employability. Jisc.Google Scholar
  9. Downey, A. (2016). Critical Information Literacy: Foundations, Inspiration and Ideas. Sacramento: Library Juice.Google Scholar
  10. Edwards, S. (2006). Panning for Gold: Information Literacy and the Net Lenses Model. Adelaide: Auslib Press.Google Scholar
  11. Elmborg, J. (2012). Critical Information Literacy: Definitions and Challenges. In C. W. Wilkinson & C. Bruch (Eds.), Transforming Information Literacy Programs: Intersecting Frontiers of Self, Library Culture, and Campus Community (pp. 75–95). Chicago: Association of College & Research Libraries.Google Scholar
  12. Giroux, H. A. (2000). Public Pedagogy and the Responsibility of Intellectuals: Youth, Littleton, and the Loss of Innocence. JAC, 20(1), 9–42.Google Scholar
  13. Glasgow Media Group. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.glasgowmediagroup.org/
  14. Godbey, S., Wainscott, S. B., & Goodman, X. (2017). Disciplinary Applications of Information Literacy Threshold Concepts. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, A Division of the American Library Association.Google Scholar
  15. Hepworth, M., & Walton, G. (2009). Teaching Information Literacy for Inquiry Based Learning. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Horton, F. W. (2007). Understanding Information Literacy: A Primer. UNESCO Information for All Programme. Edited by the Information Society Division, Communications and Information Sector. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  17. Jisc. (2017). Glasgow Caledonian University: A Focus on Flexible Curriculum Design. http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6638/1/DigicapGlasgowCaledonianUniversity.pdf. Last Accessed 2 Mar 2018.
  18. Johnston, B., & Webber, S. (2003). Information Literacy in Higher Education: A Review and Case Study. Studies in Higher Education, 28(3), 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuhlthau, C., Maniotes, L., & Caspari, A. (2015). Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century. Abington: Libraries Unlimited/Marston Books.Google Scholar
  20. Limberg, L., Sundin, S., & Talja, S. (2012). Three Theoretical Perspectives on Information Literacy. HUMAN IT, 11(2), 93–130.Google Scholar
  21. Lloyd, A. (2010). Framing Information Literacy as Information Practice: Site Ontology and Practice Theory. Journal of Documentation, 66(2), 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lloyd, A., & Williamson, K. (2008). Towards an Understanding of Information Literacy in Context: Implications for Research. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 40(1), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lupton, M. (2004). The Learning Connection: Information Literacy and the Student Experience. Adelaide: Auslib Press.Google Scholar
  24. Mason, P. (2015). PostCapitalism: A Guide to Our Future. London: Alan Lane.Google Scholar
  25. Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge: Linkages to Ways of Thinking and Practising. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving Student Learning – Theory and Practice Ten Years On (pp. 412–424). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development (OCSLD).Google Scholar
  26. Nicholson, K. P., & Seale, M. (Eds.). (2017). The Politics of Theory and the Practice of Critical Librarianship. Sacramento: Library Juice Press.Google Scholar
  27. Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  28. Peters, M. A., & Bulut, E. (Eds.). (2011). Cognitive Capitalism, Education and Digital Labour. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  29. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants, Part 1. On the Horizon, 9, 1–6.Google Scholar
  30. Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution and How to Respond. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/. Last Accessed 16 Nov 2018.
  31. Secker, J., & Coonan, E. (2013). In J. Secker & E. Coonan (Eds.), Rethinking Information Literacy: A Practical Framework for Supporting Learning. London: Facet Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Smith, L. (2013). Towards a Model of Critical Information Literacy Instruction for the Development of Political Agency. Journal of Information Literacy, 7(2), 15–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.11645/7.2.1809.
  33. Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Trowler, P., Saunders, M., & Bamber, V. (Eds.). (2014). Tribes and Territories in the 21st Century: Rethinking the Significance of Disciplines in Higher Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. UNESCO. (2003). The Prague Declaration – “Towards an Information Literate Society”. Retrieved from http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/ev.php-URL_ID=19636&URL_DO=DO_PRINTPAGE&URL_SE CTION=201.html
  36. UNESCO. (2005). The Alexandria Proclamation on Information Literacy and Lifelong Learning. Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/III/wsis/BeaconInfSoc.html
  37. UNESCO. (2006). High-Level Colloquium on Information Literacy and Lifelong Learning. Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/III/wsis/High-Level-Colloquium.pdf
  38. UNESCO. (2016). Riga Recommendations on Media and Information Literacy in a Shifting Media and Information Landscape. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/Events/riga_recommendations_on_media_and_information_literacy.pdf
  39. Webber, S., & Johnston, B. (2000). Conceptions of Information Literacy: New Perspectives and Implications. Journal of Information Science, 26(6), 381–397.  https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150002600602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Webber, S., & Johnston, B. (2006). Working Towards the Information Literate University. In G. Walton & A. Pope (Eds.), Information Literacy: Recognising the Need. Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent: 17 May 2006 (pp. 47–58). Oxford: Chandos.Google Scholar
  41. Webber, S., & Johnston, B. (2013). Transforming Information Literacy for Higher Education in the 21st Century: A Lifelong Learning Approach. In M. Hepworth & G. Walton (Eds.), Developing People’s Information Capabilities: Fostering Information Literacy in Educational, Workplace and Community Contexts. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  42. Webber, S., & Johnston, B. (2017). Information Literacy: Conceptions, Context and the Formation of a Discipline. Journal of Information Literacy, 11(1).  https://doi.org/10.11645/11.1.2205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. White, D. S., & le Cornu, A. (2011, September 2011). Visitors and Residents: A New Typology for Online Engagement. First Monday, 16(9-5), P1–10.Google Scholar
  44. Wilson, T. (2010). Fifty Years of Information Behaviour Research. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 36(3), 27–34.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2010.1720360308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zurkowski, P. (1974). The Information Services Environment: Relationships and Priorities. Washington, DC: National Commission on Libraries and Information Science.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bill Johnston
    • 1
  • Sheila MacNeill
    • 2
  • Keith Smyth
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Psychological Science and HealthUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK
  2. 2.Academic Quality and DevelopmentGlasgow Caledonian UniversityGlasgowUK
  3. 3.Learning and Teaching AcademyUniversity of the Highlands and IslandsInvernessUK

Personalised recommendations