Advertisement

On Reliable Collaborative Mobility Services

  • A. Luis OsórioEmail author
  • Luis M. Camarinha-Matos
  • Hamideh Afsarmanesh
  • Adam Belloum
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 534)

Abstract

Current approaches for development of collaborative business process automation, when requiring the participation of multiple stakeholders, lack proper formalization in terms of the required informatics systems landscape. Existing solutions depend on specific technology strategies and do not offer a suitable model for the fast-growing collaborative services. In this paper, we present the concept of an open informatics system of systems (ISoS), as a holistic framework that can be applied to a European wide payment system for collaborative multimodal mobility services. To illustrate how the ISoS framework could be applied in practice, we consider the payment service to support public transports, motorway and bridges tolling, payment in parking lots, bicycle renting and payment in a fueling station, all under a single contract. While each participating organization (any infrastructure operator) is free to adopt any applicable technology, the proposed ECoNet collaboration infrastructure is aimed to support a multi-supplier (open) informatics system technology landscape. Based on results from previous research, the paper introduces a strategy to allow effective and reliable EU wide collaborative mobility services.

Keywords

Complex informatics systems Collaborative networks Collaborative services Distributed systems Integrated system of systems 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by Galpgeste and BP Portugal through the research project Horus, by the Administration of the Port of Lisbon and Leixões through the MIELE project, the A-to-Be (Brisa Innovation and Technology), and ANSR (National Road Security Authority) through the SINCRO project. Partial support also from the Center of Technology and Systems – Uninova, and the Portuguese FCT-PEST program UID/EEA/00066/2013.

References

  1. 1.
    Ailijiang, A., Charapko, A., Demirbas, M.: Consensus in the cloud: Paxos systems demystified. In: 2016 25th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN), pp. 1–10, August 2016Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amato, A., Cretella, G., Di Martino, B., Tasquier, L., Venticinque, S.: Semantic engine and cloud agency for vendor agnostic retrieval, discovery, and brokering of cloud services. In: Al-Saidi, A., Fleischer, R., Maamar, Z., Rana, O.F. (eds.) ICC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8993, pp. 8–25. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19848-4_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balalaie, A., Heydarnoori, A., Jamshidi, P.: Microservices architecture enables devops: migration to a cloud-native architecture. IEEE Softw. 33(3), 42–52 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Birkinshaw, J.: Reflections on open strategy. Long Range Plann. 50(3), 423–426 (2017). Open strategy: transparency and inclusion in strategy processesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H., Ermilova, E., Ferrada, F., Klen, A., Jarimo, T.: ARCON reference models for collaborative networks. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H. (eds.) Collaborative Networks: Reference Modeling, pp. 83–112. Springer, Boston (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79426-6_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: Towards a reference model for collaborative networked organizations. In: Shen, W. (ed.) BASYS 2006. IFIP AICT, vol. 220, pp. 193–202. Springer, Boston (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36594-7_21. On reference models for collaborative networked organizations. Int. J. Prod. Res. 46(9), 2453–2469 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cerny, T., Donahoo, M.J., Trnka, M.: Contextual understanding of microservice architecture: current and future directions. SIGAPP Appl. Comput. Rev. 17(4), 29–45 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Couto, R., Leal, J., Costa, P.M., Galvão, T.: Exploring ticketing approaches using mobile technologies: QR codes, NFC and BLE. In: 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 7–12, September 2015Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cuadrado, F., Dueas, J.C., Ruiz, J.L., Bermejo, J., Garcia, M.: An open source platform for the integration of distributed services. In: 22nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications - Workshops (AINA Workshops 2008), pp. 1422–1427, March 2008Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garcia-Valls, M., Casimiro, A., Reiser, H.P.: A few open problems and solutions for software technologies for dependable distributed systems. J. Syst. Archit. 73, 1–5 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hinkelmann, K., Gerber, A., Karagiannis, D., Thoenssen, B., van der Merwe, A., Woitsch, R.: A new paradigm for the continuous alignment of business and it: combining enterprise architecture modelling and enterprise ontology. Comput. Ind. 79, 77–86 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karim Jallow, A., Demian, P., Anumba, C.J., Baldwin, A.N.: An enterprise architecture framework for electronic requirements information management. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 37(5), 455–472 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karmel, A., Chandramouli, R., Iorga, M.: Nist definition of microservices, application containers and system virtual machines. Technical report, NIST - National Institute of Standards and Technology (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kreps, J., Narkhede, N., Rao, J.: Kafka: a distributed messaging system for log processing. In: Proceedings of 6th International Workshop on Networking Meets Databases (NetDB), Athens, Greece (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lampesberger, H.: Technologies for web and cloud service interaction: a survey. Serv. Oriented Comput. Appl. 10(2), 71–110 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lapalme, J., Gerber, A., Van der Merwe, A., Zachman, J., De Vries, M., Hinkelmann, K.: Exploring the future of enterprise architecture: a Zachman perspective. Comput. Ind. 79, 103–113 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Macedo, P., Camarinha-Matos, L.M.: Value systems alignment analysis in collaborative networked organizations management. Appl. Sci. 7(12), 1231 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.3390/app7121231
  18. 18.
    Maddens, S.: Building blocks for smart societies in a connected world: a regulatory perspective on fifth generation collaborative regulation. Technical report, ITU, Regulatory and Market Environment Division, BDT (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    McHenry, M.P.: Technical and governance considerations for advanced metering infrastructure/smart meters: technology, security, uncertainty, costs, benefits, and risks. Energy Policy 59, 834–842 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mercer, S., Everson, P., Cox, T.: The next generation of it operating models - 6 key themes for the CIOs. Technical report, Deloitte (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Olsen, D.H., Trelsgard, K.: Enterprise architecture adoption challenges: an exploratory case study of the Norwegian higher education sector. Procedia Comput. Sci. 100, 804–811 (2016). International Conference on ENTERprise Information Systems/International Conference on Project MANagement/International Conference on Health and Social Care Information Systems and Technologies, CENTERIS/ProjMAN/HCist 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Osório, A.L., Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: Cooperation enabled systems for collaborative networks. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Pereira-Klen, A., Afsarmanesh, H. (eds.) PRO-VE 2011. IFIP AICT, vol. 362, pp. 400–409. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23330-2_44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Osório, A.L., Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: Enterprise collaboration network for transport and logistics services. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Scherer, R.J. (eds.) PRO-VE 2013. IFIP AICT, vol. 408, pp. 267–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40543-3_29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Osório, A.L., et al.: Open multi-technology service oriented architecture for “Its” business models: the ITSIBus Etoll services. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H., Ortiz, A. (eds.) PRO-VE 2005. IFIP AICT, vol. 186, pp. 439–446. Springer, Boston (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29360-4_46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Osório, A.L.: Towards vendor-agnostic IT-System of IT-Systems with the CEDE platform. In: Afsarmanesh, H., Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Lucas Soares, A. (eds.) PRO-VE 2016. IFIP AICT, vol. 480, pp. 494–505. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45390-3_42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Osório, A.L., Belloum, A., Afsarmanesh, H., Camarinha-Matos, L.M.: Agnostic informatics system of systems: the open ISoS services framework. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H., Fornasiero, R. (eds.) PRO-VE 2017. IFIP AICT, vol. 506, pp. 407–420. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65151-4_37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Osório, L.A., Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: ECoNet platform for collaborative logistics and transport. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Bénaben, F., Picard, W. (eds.) PRO-VE 2015. IFIP AICT, vol. 463, pp. 265–276. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24141-8_24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Veríssimo, P., Neves, N.F., Correia, M.: CRUTIAL: the blueprint of a reference critical information infrastructure architecture. In: Lopez, J. (ed.) CRITIS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4347, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/11962977_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sjoerdstra, B.: Dealing with vendor lock-in, June 2016. http://essay.utwente.nl/70153/1/Sjoerdstra_BA_BMS.pdf
  30. 30.
    Stoicescu, M., Fabre, J.-C., Roy, M.: Architecting resilient computing systems: a component-based approach for adaptive fault tolerance. J. Syst. Archit. 73, 6–16 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pham Thi, T.T., Dinh, T.L., Helfert, M., Leonard, M.: Modelling collaborative services: The COSEMO model. CoRR, abs/1704.03740 (2017)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Truyen, E., Van Landuyt, D., Reniers, V., Rafique, A., Lagaisse, B., Joosen, W.: Towards a container-based architecture for multi-tenant saas applications. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Workshop on Adaptive and Reflective Middleware, ARM 2016, pp. 6:1–6:6. ACM, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Urze, P., Abreu, A.: Knowledge transfer assessment in a co-innovation network. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Xu, L., Afsarmanesh, H. (eds.) PRO-VE 2012. IFIP AICT, vol. 380, pp. 605–615. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32775-9_60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang, G., Koshy, J., Subramanian, S., Paramasivam, K., Zadeh, M., Narkhede, N., Rao, J., Kreps, J., Stein, J.: Building a replicated logging system with apache kafka. Proc. VLDB Endow. 8(12), 1654–1655 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wiggers, P., Armes, D., Engelhart, N., McKenzie, P.: SIAM: Principles and Practices for Service Integration and Management. Van Haren Publishing (2015)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhu, F., Liu, Q.: Competing with complementors: an empirical look at amazon.com. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 15-044, December 2014. 2015:15468, 01 2015Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zupan, N., Zhang, K., Jacobsen, H.-A.: Hyperpubsub: a decentralized, permissioned, publish/subscribe service using blockchains: Demo. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IFIP/USENIX Middleware Conference: Posters and Demos, Middleware 2017, pp. 15–16. ACM, New York (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Luis Osório
    • 1
    Email author
  • Luis M. Camarinha-Matos
    • 2
  • Hamideh Afsarmanesh
    • 3
  • Adam Belloum
    • 3
  1. 1.ISEL - Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, and POLITEC&IDLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Faculty of Sciences and Technology and CTS-UninovaNOVA University of LisbonCaparicaPortugal
  3. 3.University of Amsterdam (UvA)AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations