Advertisement

Pain pp 1293-1297 | Cite as

Learning Theories and Exam Taking Strategies

  • Deepak Agarwal
  • Maged ArgaliousEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies are essential to gain expertise in a new field of study. To best capitalize on an effective strategy requires strong meta-cognitive skills, which are associated with positive learning outcomes and testing performance.

In studies of hundreds of college students, five of fifteen strategies were shown to be statistically significant in improving scores during testing performance. These were self-evaluation, seeking information, goal setting and planning, reviewing exams, and reviewing notes. It was also shown that those students who maintained or improved to high scores, more frequently utilized SRL strategies when compared to their peers.

We will discuss two learning theories: Kolb’s processing and perception continuum, and constructivism. Understanding these theories will help explain why these SRL strategies and meta-cognitive skills will help you fully engage in your learning potential.

Keywords

Self-Regulated Learning Learning theories Kolb’s learning style inventory Constructivism Miller’s Pyramid 

References

  1. 1.
    Akella D. Learning together: Kolb's experiential theory and its application. J Manag Organ. 2010;16(1):100–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fry H, Ketteridge S, Marshall S, eds. Understanding student learning. In: A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice. Routledge; 2008Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sebesta AJ, Speth EB. How should I study for the exam? Self-regulated learning strategies and achievement in introductory biology. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017;16(2):ar30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Putnam AL, Sungkhasettee VW, Roediger HL III. Optimizing learning in college: tips from cognitive psychology. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016;11(5):652–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wass V, Van der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, Jones R. Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet. 2001;357(9260):945–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Anesthesiology InstituteClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations