Advertisement

“How Are We Doing?” Using a Maturity Model Assessment

  • Flevy LasradoEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on assisting organizations with evaluating their innovation deployment and charting a path forward. We introduce a Creativity and Innovation Assessment Maturity (CIAM) tool. The four major components discussed in the previous chapter make up the important elements of the model, which recognizes three levels of achievement, or maturity. The CIAM tool can be used to assess innovation from grassroots efforts with ad hoc projects to world-class deployment. The chapter provides advice on how organizations can use this structured model to address critical questions such as:
  • Do we have the right pieces in place to innovate?

  • Is anything missing in our innovation deployment?

  • What are we doing well in terms of innovation levers?

  • What are our challenges for our innovation deployment?

  • What is most important for us to work on for the next level of maturity?

Keywords

Maturity CIAM Assessment Scoring Innovation levers Initial stage Developmental stage Advanced stage 

References

  1. Adams, R., J. Bessant, and R. Phelps. 2006. Innovation Management Measurement: A Review. International Journal of Management Reviews 8 (1): 21–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cozijnsen, A.J., and W.J. Vrakking. 2013. Veranderkunde (“Change Management”). Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  3. El Bassiti, L., and R. Ajhoun. 2016. Towards Innovation Excellence: Why and How to Measure Innovation Performance? In Information and Communication Technology for the Muslim World (ICT4M), 2016 6th International Conference, pp. 99–104. IEEE.Google Scholar
  4. Kerka, F., B. Kriegesmann, and M.G. Schwering. 2009. Evaluating Innovation Ideas: A Comprehensive Approach to New Product Development. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning 5 (2): 118–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Morris, L. 2011. The Innovation Master Plan: The CEO’s Guide to Innovation. Walnut Creek: Innovation Academy.Google Scholar
  6. Muller, A., L. Välikangas, and P. Merlyn. 2005. Metrics for Innovation: Guidelines for Developing a Customized Suite of Innovation Metrics. Strategy & Leadership 33 (1): 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. OECD. 2015. Better Life Index. http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/. Accessed 8 Sept 2015.
  8. Weick, K.E., and R.E. Quinn. 1999. Organizational Change and Development. Annual Review of Psychology 50 (1): 361–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Wollongong in DubaiDubaiUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations