The American Gun Control Debate: A Discursive Analysis

  • Simon GoodmanEmail author
  • Bethany Perry
Part of the Peace Psychology Book Series book series (PPBS)


This chapter contains a discursive analysis of the gun control debate in the USA. This is a controversial debate that has implications for peace and conflict, as the debate relates to policies regarding weapons and the potential prevention of mass shootings. However, there has been a lack of detailed analysis of the ways in which the arguments in this debate are made. As the discursive approach can overcome these limitations, it is used to analyse texts produced by two key players in this debate, (then) President Barack Obama in support of tighter controls and Wayne LaPierre of the National Rifle Association (NRA) against. The results demonstrate two polarised dichotomies. The first of these sees both speakers present themselves as working to protect something important. Obama presents his measures as in the service of protecting lives whereas LaPierre presents his opposition to the same measures as designed to protect freedom. A second dichotomy can be seen where Obama constructs those who support gun control as ‘courageous’, whereas for LaPierre these same people are constructed as villains. The analysis is used to identify the ways in which both speakers attempt to present their arguments as legitimate. It is therefore shown how discursive psychology, when applied to the gun control debate, helps us understand how issues of peace and conflict are drawn upon and how such debates can influence policy regarding the continuation of armed violence.


Discursive psychology Gun control Identity Peace psychology Second amendment 


  1. 25 Deadliest Mass Shootings in U.S. History Fast Facts. (2017, June 28), CNN. Retrieved from
  2. Abell, J., & Stokoe, E. (2001). Broadcasting the royal role: Constructing culturally situated identities in the Princess Diana Panorama interview. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 417–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berlet, C., & Lyons, M. N. (2000). Right-wing populism in America: Too close for comfort. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  4. Billig, M. (2001). Discursive, rhetorical and ideological messages. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 210–221). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Blendon, R. J., Young, J. T., & Hemenway, D. (1996). The American public and the gun control debate. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 275, 1719–1722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouffard, J. A., Nobles, M. R., Wells, W., & Cavanaugh, M. R. (2012). How many more guns? Estimating the effect of allowing licensed concealed handguns on a college campus. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 316–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braman, D., & Kahan, D. M. (2003). More statistics, less persuasion: A cultural theory of gun-risk perceptions. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 51, 1291–1327.Google Scholar
  8. Capdevila, R., & Callaghan, J. (2008). ‘It’s not racist. It’s common sense’. A critical analysis of political discourse around asylum and immigration in the UK. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christensen, J. (2013, February 5). How the violent mentally ill can buy guns. CNN. Retrieved from
  10. Downs, D. (2002). Representing gun owners: Frame identification as social responsibility in news media discourse. Written Communication, 19, 44–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Gibson, S. (2012). ‘I’m not a war monger but…’: Discourse analysis and social psychological peace research. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22, 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graham, P., Keenan, T., & Dowd, A.-M. (2004). A call to arms at the end of history: A discourse-historical analysis of George W. Bush’s declaration of War on Terror. Discourse and Society, 15, 199–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gun Violence Archive. (2017). Past summary ledgers. Retrieved from
  16. Johnson, A. J., & Goodman, S. (2013). Reversing racism and the elite conspiracy: Strategies used by the British National Party leader in response to hostile media appearances. Discourse, Context and Media, 2, 156–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kleck, G., Gertz, M., & Bratton, J. (2009). Why do people support gun control? Alternative explanations of support for handgun bans. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 496–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leudar, I., & Nekvapil, J. (2004). Media dialogical networks and political argumentation. Journal of Language and Politics, 3, 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McDonald, G., LeBrun, E., Berman, E., & Krause, K. (Eds.). (2012). Small arms survey 2012: Moving targets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. McGinty, E. E., Webster, D. W., & Barry, C. L. (2013). Effects of news media messages about mass shootings on attitudes towards persons with serious mental illness and public support for gun control policies. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 494–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McKinlay, A., & Dunnet, A. (1998). How gun-owners accomplish being deadly average. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 34–51). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. O’Grady, W., Parnaby, P. F., & Schikschneit, J. (2010). Guns, gangs, and the underclass: A constructionist analysis of gun violence in a Toronto high school. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 52, 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. O’Neill, K. L. (2007). Armed citizens and the stories they tell: The National Rifle Association’s achievement of terror and masculinity. Men and Masculinities, 9, 457–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Patten, R., Thomas, M. O., & Wada, J. C. (2013). Packing heat: Attitudes regarding concealed weapons on college campuses. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 551–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Potter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative analysis: Issues of theory and method (2nd ed., pp. 200–221). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Ricento, T. (2003). The discursive construction of Americanism. Discourse and Society, 14, 611–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seate, A. A., Cohen, E. L., Fujioka, Y., & Hoffner, C. (2012). Exploring gun ownership as a social identity to understanding the perceived media influence of the Virginia Tech news coverage on attitudes toward gun control policy. Communication Research Reports, 29, 130–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. The Economist. (2013). Why the NRA keeps talking about mental illness, rather than guns. Retrieved from
  29. Tileagă, C. (2013). Political psychology: Critical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9, 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Winkler, A. (2013). Gunfight: The battle over the right to bear arms in America. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  32. Wintemute, G. J. (2014). Support for a comprehensive background check requirement and expanded denial criteria for firearm transfers: Findings from the firearms licensee survey. Journal of Urban Health, 91, 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Coventry UniversityCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations