Advertisement

Discursive Psychology and Domestic Violence

  • Alison J. Towns
  • Peter J. Adams
Chapter
Part of the Peace Psychology Book Series book series (PPBS)

Abstract

This chapter explores ways in which discursive psychology sheds light on how language justifies, conceals, and works to produce the dominance of men in intimate relationships. We demonstrate two ways language can be deployed to achieve these effects. First, the close examination of discourses about violence can reveal much about the way violence against women is justified, minimized and ignored. Second, attention to rhetorical devices deployed in these discourses, such as metaphor, ambiguity, and marking strategies, can help in understanding how they are anchored and reinforced in everyday conversations. These forms of discursive enquiry, and other possibilities, open up ways of better understanding the dynamics of men’s violence against women and opportunities for intervention to produce more equitable practices.

Keywords

Discursive psychology Domestic violence Foucauldian discourse analysis Peace psychology Violence against women 

References

  1. Adams, P. J. (2012). Masculine empire: How men use violence to keep women in line. Auckland: Dunmore.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, P. J., Towns, A., & Gavey, N. (1995). Dominance and entitlement: The rhetoric men use to discuss their violence towards women. Discourse & Society, 6, 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alio, A. P., Nana, P. N., & Salihu, H. M. (2009). Spousal violence and potentially preventable single and recurrent spontaneous fetal loss in an African setting: Cross-sectional study. The Lancet, 373, 318–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergman, N., & Brismar, B. (1991). A 5-year follow-up study of 117 battered women. American Journal of Public Health, 81, 1486–1489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Black, M. C. (2011). Intimate partner violence and adverse health consequences. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 5, 428–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breckenridge, J., Hamer, J., Newton, B., & Valentine, K. (2013). NSW homelessness action plan extended evaluation: Final evaluation report for long-term accommodation and support for women and children experiencing domestic and family violence. Sydney: NSW Government.Google Scholar
  8. Briere, J., & Jordan, C. E. (2004). Violence against women: Outcome complexity and implications for assessment and treatment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1252–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cahill, A. (2015). Bodies, sex work and ethics: Thinking beyond objectification. Psychology Department Gender and Sexual Politics Symposium, Engineering School, University of Auckland, 28 January.Google Scholar
  10. Christie, D. J., Tint, B. S., Wagner, R. V., & Winter, D. D. (2008). Peace psychology for a peaceful world. American Psychologist, 63, 540–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Bocanegra, H. T., Rostovtseva, D. P., Khera, S., & Godhwani, N. (2010). Birth control sabotage and forced sex: Experiences reported by women in domestic violence shelters. Violence Against Women, 16, 601–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dragiewicz, M. (2008). Patriarchy reasserted: Fathers’ rights and anti-VAWA Activism. Feminist Criminology, 3, 121–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dutton, M. A., Green, B. L., Kaltman, S. I., Roesch, D. M., Zeffiro, T. A., & Krause, E. D. (2006). Intimate partner violence, PTSD, and adverse health outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 955–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ehrensaft, M. K., Cohen, P., Brown, J., Smailes, E., Chen, H., & Johnson, J. G. (2003). Intergenerational transmission of partner violence: A 20 year prospective study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 741–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ellsberg, M., Jansen, H. A. F. M., Heise, L. L., Watts, C. H., & Garcia-Moreno, C. (2008). Intimate partner violence and women’s physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence: An observational study. The Lancet, 371, 1165–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Enander, V. (2010). “A fool to keep staying”: Battered women labeling themselves stupid as an expression of gendered shame. Violence Against Women, 16, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Erez, E., Ibarra, P. R., & Gur, O. M. (2015). At the intersection of private and political conflict zones: Policing domestic violence in the Arab community in Israel. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59, 930–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fanslow, J., Robinson, E., Crengle, S., & Perese, L. (2010). Juxtaposing beliefs and reality: Prevalence rates of intimate partner violence and attitudes to violence and gender roles reported by New Zealand women. Violence Against Women, 16, 812–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fanslow, J., Silva, M., Whitehead, A., & Robinson, E. (2008). Pregnancy outcomes and intimate partner violence in New Zealand. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 48, 391–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  21. Foucault, M. (1980). Two lectures: Lecture one 7 January 1976, Lecture two 14 January 1976. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 by Michel Foucault (pp. 79–108). Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  22. Foucault, M. (1982). Afterword: The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  24. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 86–104). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  25. Freire, P. (1970). Pedogogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
  26. FVDRC. (2015). Family Violence Death Review Committee fourth annual report: December 2012-December 2013. Wellington: Health Quality and Safety Commission New Zealand.Google Scholar
  27. Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by peaceful means: Peace and conflict, development and civilization. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Garcia-Moreno, C. (2009). Intimate partner violence and fetal loss. The Lancet, 373, 278–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Garcia-Moreno, C., Jansen, H. A., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L. L., & Watts, C. (2006). Prevalence of intimate partner violence: Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. The Lancet, 368, 1260–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gavey, N. (1989). Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 459–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gavey, N. (2005). Just sex? The cultural scaffolding of rape. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Gavey, N. (2011). Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis revisited. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Glass, N., Laughon, K., Campbell, J., Block, C. R., Hanson, G., Sharps, P., et al. (2008). Non-fatal strangulation is an important risk factor for homicide of women. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 35, 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gottzen, L. (2016). Displaying shame: Men’s violence towards women in a culture of gender equality. In M. Hyden, M. Wade, & A. Gadd (Eds.), Response based approaches to the study of interpersonal violence (pp. 156–175). London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  35. Hand, T., Chung, D., & Peter, M. (2009). The use of information and communication technologies to coerce and control in domestic violence and following separation. Retrieved from www.adfc.unsw.edu.au
  36. Hyden, M. (2005). ‘I must have been an idiot to let it go on’: Agency and positioning in battered women’s narratives of leaving. Feminism & Psychology, 15, 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jack, D. C. (1991). Silencing the self: Women and depression. New York: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Jackson, H., Philp, E., Nuttall, R. L. & Diller, L. (2002). Traumatic brain injury: A hidden consequence for battered women. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 33, 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. LeCouteur, A., & Oxlad, M. (2011). Managing accountability for domestic violence: Identities, membership categories and morality in perpetrators’ talk. Feminism & Psychology, 21, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  41. Lloyd, S. & Taluc, N. (1999). The effect of male violence on female employment. Violence Against Women, 5, 370–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ludermir, A. B., Schraiber, L. B., D’Oliveira, A. F. P. L., Franca-Junior, I., & Jansen, H. A. (2008). Violence against women by their intimate partner and common mental disorders. Social Science & Medicine, 66, 1008–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martin, J., & Pritchard, R. (2010). Learning from tragedy: Homicide within families in New Zealand 2002-2006. Wellington: Ministry of Social Development.Google Scholar
  44. Nairn, R. G., & McCreanor, T. N. (1990). Insensitivity and hypersensitivity: An imbalance in Pakeha accounts of racial conflict. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9, 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nairn, R. G., & McCreanor, T. N. (1991). Race talk and common sense: Patterns in Pakeha discourse on Maori/Pakeha relations in New Zealand. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 10, 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Office for National Statistics. (2017). Compendium: Focus on violent crime and sexual offences, England and Wales, year ending March 2016: Homicide. Retrieved from https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/compendium/focusonviolentcrimeandsexualoffences/yearendingmarch2016/homicide#how-are-victims-and-suspects-related
  47. Snively, S. (1995). The New Zealand economic cost of family violence. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, (4). Retrieved from https://www.msd.govt.nz/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/journals-and-magazines/social-policy-journal/spj04/04-the-new-zealand-economic-cost-of-family-violence.html
  48. Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Swanberg, J. E., & Logan, T. K. (2005). Domestic violence and employment: A qualitative study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Taft, C. T., Murphy, C. M., King, L. A., Dedyn, J. M., & Musser, P. H. (2005). Posttraumatic Stress Disorder symptomatology among partners of men in treatment for relationship abuse. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Theismeyer, L. (2003). Introduction. In L. Theismeyer (Ed.), Discourses and silencing: Representation and the language of displacement (pp. 1–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Towns, A. J. (2014). “It’s about having control back, freedom from fear.” An evaluation of the Shine safe@home programme for victims/survivors of domestic violence. Auckland: Mt Albert Psychological Services Ltd. Retrieved from https://library.nzfvc.org.nz/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=4680Google Scholar
  53. Towns, A. (2015). Discursive and coercive control: Theorizing men’s domestic violence against women using the language control wheel as a training tool. Paper presented at the NZ Psychological Society Conference, ‘Te Ao Turoa—The World In Front of Us’, Waikato University, Hamilton, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311648495
  54. Towns, A. J., & Adams, P. (2016). “I didn’t know whether I was right or wrong or just bewildered.” Ambiguity, responsibility, and silencing women’s talk of men’s domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 22, 496–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Towns, A. J. & Adams, P. J. (2009). Staying quiet or getting out: Some ideological dilemmas faced by women who experience violence from male partners. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 735–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Towns, A., Adams, P. J., & Gavey, N. (2003). Silencing talk of men’s violence towards women. In L. Theismeyer (Ed.), Discourse and silencing: Representation and the language of displacement (pp. 43–77). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tutty, L. M., Ogden, C., Giurgiu, B., & Weaver-Dunlop, G. (2013). I built my house of hope: Abused women and pathways into homelessness. Violence Against Women, 19, 1498–1517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Van Niekirk, T. J. & Boonzaier, F. (2016) “The only solution there is to fight”: Discourses of masculinity among South African domestically violence men. Violence Against Women, 22, 271–291.Google Scholar
  59. VPC. (2016). When men murder women: An analysis of 2014 homicide data. Violence Policy Centre. Retrieved from http://www.vpc.org/studies/wmmw2016.pdf
  60. Wolfe, D. A., & Jaffe, P. G. (1999). Emerging strategies in the prevention of domestic violence. The Future of Children, 9, 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. World Health Organization. (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  62. World Health Organization. (2004). Preventing violence: A guide to implementing the recommendations of the World Report on Violence and Health. Geneva: World Health Organisation. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43014/1/9241592079.pdfGoogle Scholar
  63. Zeitler, D. (2007). The abused female oral and maxillofacial surgery patient: Treatment approaches for identification and management. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America, 19, 259–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alison J. Towns
    • 1
  • Peter J. Adams
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations