Advertisement

Concluding Remarks: Developing a Critical Discursive Peace Psychology

  • Stephen Gibson
Chapter
Part of the Peace Psychology Book Series book series (PPBS)

Abstract

This final brief concluding chapter draws out some of the key lessons that we might take from the analyses presented in the preceding chapters, and in so doing points the way to further developments in what might tentatively be described as critical discursive peace psychology. First, I will consider the essentially contested nature of the objects of peace psychology, most notably ‘peace’ itself, and suggest that the focus on analysts’ definitions of peace (and violence) might usefully be complemented by a greater concern with participants’ constructions. Second, I will consider the potential for discursive peace psychology to contribute to the analysis of cultural violence (and, by extension, to the achievement of cultures of peace), as well as suggesting that a unique contribution might come in terms of the analysis of discursive violence. Third, I will consider the practical implications for discursive psychology, with the encounter with peace psychology encouraging a more interventionist (in the non-military sense) form of practical engagement. Fourth, I will sketch out some potential obstacles to an integration of discursive and peace psychology, focusing in particular on the incompatibilities between the structural focus of peace psychology and the post-structural orientation of discursive psychology. Fifth, and relatedly, I will suggest that a post-structural positon has advantages in enabling peace psychology to overcome a residual individualism that it shares with much of the broader discipline of psychology.

Keywords

Cultural violence Discursive psychology Discursive violence Individualism Peace psychology Post-structuralism Structural violence 

References

  1. Antaki, C. (Ed.). (2011). Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Ashmore, M. (1989). The reflexive thesis: Wrighting sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Billig, M. (1988). The notion of ‘prejudice’: Some rhetorical and ideological aspects. Text, 8, 91–110.Google Scholar
  4. Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and ridicule: Towards a social critique of humour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Billig, M. (2012). Undisciplined beginnings, academic success, and discursive psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 413–424.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02086.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Billig, M. (2013). Learn to write badly: How to succeed in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Binkley, S. (2014). Happiness as enterprise: An essay on neoliberal life. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  8. Christie, D. J. (2006). What is peace psychology the psychology of? Journal of Social Issues, 62, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohrs, J. C., Christie, D. J., White, M. P., & Das, C. (2013). Contributions of positive psychology to peace: Toward global well-being and resilience. American Psychologist, 68, 590–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Condor, S. (1988). ‘Race stereotypes’ and racist discourse. Text, 8, 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Condor, S., Figgou, L., Abell, J., Gibson, S., & Stevenson, C. (2006). ‘They’re not racist’: Prejudice denial, mitigation and suppression in dialogue. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 441–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Edwards, D., Ashmore, M., & Potter, J. (1995). Death and furniture: The rhetoric, politics and theology of bottom line arguments against relativism. History of the Human Sciences, 8, 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fox, D., Prilleltensky, I., & Austin, S. (2009). Critical psychology: An introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6, 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27, 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gergen, K. J. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gibson, S. (2011). Social psychology, war and peace: Towards a critical discursive peace psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (1998). Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Hepburn, A. (2003). An introduction to critical social psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Karlberg, M. (2012). Discourse theory and peace. In D. J. Christie (Ed.), The encyclopedia of peace psychology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Kelman, H. C. (2010). Interactive problem solving: Changing political culture in the pursuit of conflict resolution. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 16, 389–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kelman, H. C. (2015). The development of interactive problem solving: In John Burton’s footsteps. Political Psychology, 36, 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mulkay, M. (1985). The word and the world: Explorations in the form of sociological analysis. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  27. Owusu-Bempah, K., & Howitt, D. (2000). Psychology beyond western perspectives. Leicester: British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
  28. Potter, J. (2001). Wittgenstein and Austin. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 39–46). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Sampson, E. E. (1993). Celebrating the other: A dialogic account of human nature. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  30. Stokoe, E. (2013). The (in)authenticity of simulated talk: Comparing role-played and actual interaction and the implications for communication training. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46, 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stokoe, E. (2014). The conversation analytic role-play method (CARM): A method for training communication skills as an alternative to simulated role-play. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47, 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wetherell, M. (1996). Constructing social identities: The individual/social binary in Henri Tajfel’s social psychology. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 269–284). Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
  33. Willig, C. (1999). Applied discourse analysis: Social and psychological interventions. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Žižek, S. (2008). Violence. London: Profile.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.York St John UniversityYorkUK

Personalised recommendations