Advertisement

Discursive Psychology and Social Practices of Avoidance

  • Cristian TileagăEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Peace Psychology Book Series book series (PPBS)

Abstract

This is a chapter about the contribution of discursive psychology to researching social practices of avoidance (gaps, silences, ambivalence) in contexts of rapid social change. I open the chapter with a description and discussion of discursive psychology’s main tenets. I then move on to explore the production of the essence of the communist social past in one of the most controversial texts of the Romanian post-communist transition (the Tismăneanu Report condemning communism in Romania). I place emphasis on one particular aspect—the relationship between social repression and resistance in constructing communism as Other, not quite “us.” Finally, I highlight the relevance of discursive psychology for peace psychology, and show how discursive psychological research can provide significant insights to understanding the social impact of discursive and textual practices around topics or feelings that are too “difficult” to discuss but that, nonetheless, matter for communities that aspire to come to terms with an unjust past.

Keywords

Communism Discursive psychology Memory Peace psychology Romania 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to John Wiley & Sons, Routledge, and Cambridge Scholars Publishing for permitting me to reproduce and adapt material published elsewhere.

References

  1. Adorno, T. (1986). What does coming to terms with the past mean? (trans. T. Bahti & G. Hartman). In G. Hartman (Ed.), Bitburg in moral and political perspective (pp. 114–129). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Antaki, C. (2013). Two conversational practices for encouraging adults with intellectual disabilities to reflect on their activities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57, 580–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Augoustinos, M., Hastie, B., & Wright, M. (2011). Apologizing for historical injustice: Emotion, truth and identity in political discourse. Discourse & Society, 22, 507–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  5. Billig, M. (1997). Discursive, rhetorical and ideological messages. In C. McGarty & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The message of social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Billig, M. (1999). Freudian repression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brockmeier, J. (2010). After the archive: Remapping memory. Culture & Psychology, 16, 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bucur, M. (2009). Heroes and victims: Remembering war in twentieth-century Romania. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cesereanu, R. (2008). The final report on the Holocaust and the final report on the Communist dictatorship in Romania. East European Politics and Societies, 22, 270–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christie, D., & Montiel, C. (2013). Contributions of psychology to war and peace. American Psychologist, 68, 502–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ciobanu, M. (2009). Criminalising the past and reconstructing collective memory: The Romanian Truth Commission. Europe-Asia Studies, 61, 313–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. DeVault, M., & McCoy, L. (2006). Institutional ethnography: Using interviews to investigate ruling relations. In D. Smith (Ed.), Institutional ethnography as practice (pp. 15–44). Lanharn: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  14. Edwards, D. (2005). Moaning, whinging and laughing: The subjective side of complaints. Discourse Studies, 7, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edwards, D. (2012). Discursive and scientific psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 425–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freud, S. (1937). Analysis terminable and interminable. SE, 23, 209–253.Google Scholar
  17. Frosh, S. (2010). Psychoanalysis outside the clinic: Interventions in psychosocial studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galasińska, A., & Galasiński, D. (Eds.). (2010). The post-communist condition: Public and private discourses of transformation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  19. Gibson, S. (2011). Social psychology, war and peace: Towards a critical discursive peace psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilbert, G. N., & Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora’s Box: A sociological analysis of scientists’ discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2012). Crying and crying responses. In A. Peräkylä & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in interaction (pp. 194–210). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Iacob, B. C. (2010). Avem nevoie de o pedagogie a memoriei colective a trecutului comunist. Retrieved from http://www.evz.ro/detalii/stiri/bogdan-cristian-iacob-avem-nevoie-de-o-pedagogie-a-memoriei-colective-a-trecutului-comunist-90689.html
  23. Kansteiner, W. (2002). Finding meaning in memory: A methodological critique of collective memory studies. History & Theory, 41, 179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keightley, E., & Pickering, M. (2012). The mnemonic imagination: Remembering as creative practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keightley, E., & Pickering, M. (2013). Painful pasts. In E. Keightley & M. Pickering (Eds.), Research methods for memory studies (pp. 151–166). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kinder, D. R., & Kam, C. D. (2009). Us against them: Ethnocentric foundations of American opinion. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. LaCapra, D. (1994). Representing the Holocaust: History, theory, trauma. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  28. LaCapra, D. (2001). Writing history, writing trauma. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lynch, M. (1999). Archives in formation: Privileged spaces, popular archives and paper trails. History of the Human Sciences, 12, 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Margalit, A. (2002). The ethics of memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Misztal, B. (2005). Memory and democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 1320–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nussbaum, M. (2013). Political emotions: Why love matters for justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Petrescu, C., & Petrescu, D. (2007). Mastering vs. coming to terms with the past: A critical analysis of post-communist Romanian historiography. In A. Antohi, B. Trencsenyi, & P. Apor (Eds.), Narratives unbound: Historical studies in post-communist Europe (pp. 311–408). Budapest: CEU Press.Google Scholar
  34. Potter, J. (2003). Discursive psychology: Between method and paradigm. Discourse & Society, 14, 783–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rose, J. (2007). The last resistance. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  36. Rothberg, M. (2009). Multidirectional memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the age of decolonization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Skinner, Q. (2002). Visions of politics: Regarding method (Vol. I). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, D. (1974). The social construction of documentary reality. Sociological Inquiry, 44, 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith, D. (2004). Writing the social: Critique, theory and investigations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  40. Speer, S., & McPhillips, R. (2013). Patients’ perspectives on psychiatric consultations in the gender identity clinic: Implications for patient-centered communication. Patient Education and Counseling, 91, 385–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stan, L. (2006). The vanishing truth: Politics and memory in post-communist Europe. East European Quarterly, 40, 383–408.Google Scholar
  42. Stan, L. (2007). Comisia Tismăneanu: Repere internaţionale. Sfera Politicii, 126-127, 7–13.Google Scholar
  43. Stevens, G., Duncan, N., & Hook, D. (Eds.). (2013). Race, memory and the Apartheid archive: Towards a transformative psychosocial praxis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  44. Stokoe, E. (2012). Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies, 14, 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stokoe, E., & Edwards, D. (2007). ‘Black this, black that’: Racial insults and reported speech in neighbour complaints and police interrogations. Discourse & Society, 18, 337–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stokoe, E., Hepburn, A., & Antaki, C. (2012). Beware the “Loughborough School” of social psychology: Interaction and the politics of intervention. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 486–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tănăsoiu, C. (2007). The Tismăneanu report: Romania revisits its past. Problems of Post-Communism, 54, July/August.Google Scholar
  48. Tileaga, C. (2005) Accounting for extreme prejudice and legitimating blame in talk about the Romanies. Discourse & Society, 16(5), 603–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tileagă, C. (2009). The social organization of representations of history: The textual accomplishment of coming to terms with the past. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tileagă, C. (2011). (Re)writing biography: Memory, identity, and textually mediated reality in coming to terms with the past. Culture & Psychology, 17, 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tileagă, C. (2012). Communism in retrospect: The rhetoric of historical representation and writing the collective memory of recent past. Memory Studies, 5, 462–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tileagă, C. (2013). Political psychology: Critical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tileagă, C. (2015). The nature of prejudice: Society, discrimination and moral exclusion. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tileagă, C., & Stokoe, E. (Eds.). (2015). Discursive psychology: Classic and contemporary issues. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Tismăneanu, V. (2007a). Confronting Romania’s past: A response to Charles King. Slavic Review, 66, Winter.Google Scholar
  56. Tismăneanu, V. (2007b). Refuzul de a uita: Articole şi comentarii politice (2006–2007). Iasi: Curtea Veche.Google Scholar
  57. Tismăneanu, V. (2008). Democracy and memory: Romania confronts its communist past. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 617, 166–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tismăneanu, V., Dobrincu, D., & Vasile, C. (2007). Raport final: Comisia prezidentiala pentru analiza dictaturii comuniste din Romania. Bucuresti: Humanitas.Google Scholar
  59. Todorov, T. (2009). In defence of the enlightenment. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  60. van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (2006). Discourse, interaction, and cognition [special issue]. Discourse Studies, 8(1).Google Scholar
  61. van Leeuwen, T. (1995). Representing social action. Discourse & Society, 6, 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Veyne, P. (1984). Writing history: Essay on epistemology. (M, Moore-Rinvolucri, Trans. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Wagoner, B. (2015). Collective remembering as a process of social representation. In G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social representations (pp. 143–162). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Waśkiewicz, A. (2010). The Polish home army and the politics of memory. East European Politics and Society, 24, 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wertsch, J. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wertsch, J., & Karumidze, Z. (2009). Spinning the past: Russian and Georgian accounts of the War of August 2008. Memory Studies, 2, 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9, 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Loughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations