Advertisement

Unlawful, Un-cooperative and Unwanted: The Dehumanization of Asylum Seekers in the Australian Newsprint Media

  • Martha Augoustinos
  • Clemence Due
  • Peta Callaghan
Chapter
Part of the Peace Psychology Book Series book series (PPBS)

Abstract

Recent international crises such as the war in Syria have led to the displacement of unprecedented numbers of people seeking refuge in western liberal democratic nations in Europe and elsewhere. The response by western governments and their citizens to those seeking asylum and refuge has been polarized, making their resettlement a highly politicized issue that has divided host communities. The politics of border control and the treatment of asylum seekers have dominated Australian domestic politics since 2001. Since then, asylum seekers arriving by boat have been represented in the public domain as threatening to Australia’s sovereignty, security, and culture in ways that have recently been evidenced in Europe by the Syrian crisis. Using the theoretical and analytic tools of discursive psychology this chapter specifically focuses on how asylum seekers are routinely dehumanized in newsprint articles reporting on boat arrivals to Australia and discusses the implications these practices of dehumanization have for how asylum seekers are positioned in public discourse. We argue that these dehumanizing practices not only contribute to the social exclusion or ‘othering’ of asylum seekers; they also facilitate and legitimate acts of force and violence to control and restrict their mobility, positioning them as potential ‘enemies’ of the nation state.

Keywords

Asylum seekers Dehumanization Discursive psychology Peace psychology Refugees 

References

  1. Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception (K. Attell, Trans.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alverez, A. (1997). Adjusting the genocide: The techniques of neutralization and the Holocaust. Social Science History, 21, 139–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreas, P. (2003). Redrawing the line: Borders and security in the twenty-first century. International Security, 28, 78–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Australian Press Council. (2007). State of the news print media in Australia: A supplement to the 2006 report. Retrieved from http://www.presscouncil.org.au/snpma/index_snpma2007.html
  6. Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and Thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and opinions: Studies in rhetorical psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Browning, C. (1992). The path to genocide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Carrington, K. (2006). Law and order on the borders in the neo-colonial Antipodes. In S. Pickering & L. Weber (Eds.), Borders, mobility and technologies of control. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. Coole, C. (2002). A warm welcome? Scottish and UK media reporting of an asylum seeker murder. Media, Culture and Society, 24, 839–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edwards, D. & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Every, D. (2006). The politics of representation: A discursive analysis of refugee advocacy in the Australian parliament. Doctoral thesis, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
  14. Fernandez, C., Gill, M., Szeman, I., & Whyte, J. (2006). Erasing the line, or, the politics of the border. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 6, 466–483.Google Scholar
  15. Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Fox, P. D. (2010). International asylum and boat people: The Tampa affair and Australia’s Pacific solution. Maryland Journal of International Law, 25, 356–373.Google Scholar
  17. Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6, 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27, 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hagan, J., & Rymond-Richmond, W. (2008). The collective dynamics of racial dehumanization and genocidal victimization in Dafur. American Sociological Review, 73, 875–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haslam, N., Bain, P., Douge, L., Lee, M., & Bastian, B. (2005). More human than you: Attributing humanness to self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 937–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haslam, N., & Loughnan, S. (2014). Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2002). Are essentialist beliefs associated with prejudice? British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haynes, A., Devereux, E., & Breen, M. (2006). Fear, framing and foreigners: The othering of immigrants in the Irish print media. International Journal of Critical Psychology, 16, 100–121.Google Scholar
  26. Kelman, H. G. (1973). Violence without moral restraint: Reflections on the dehumanization of victims and victimizers. Journal of Social Issues, 29, 25–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kelman, H., & Hamilton, V. L. (1989). Crimes of obedience: Toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  28. KhosraviNik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., & Wodak, R. (2012). Dynamics of representation in discourse: Immigrants in the British press. In M. Messer, R. Schroeder, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Migrations: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 283–296). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kirkwood, S., Goodman, S., McVittie, C., & McKinlay, A. (2016). The language of asylum: Refugees and discourse. London: Palgrave McMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klocker, N., & Dunn, K. (2003). Who’s driving the debate?: Newspaper and government representations of asylum seekers. Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture and Policy, 109, 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krestel, R., Bergler, S., & Witte, R. (2008). Minding the source: Automatic tagging of reported speech in newspaper articles. Reporter, 1, 4.Google Scholar
  32. Krzyzanowski, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The politics of exclusion: Debating migration in Austria. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Livingstone-Smith, D. (2014). Dehumanization, essentialism, and moral psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge Working Paper.Google Scholar
  34. Lueck, K., Due, C., & Augoustinos, M. (2015). Neoliberalism and nationalism: Representations of asylum seekers in the Australian mainstream news media. Discourse and Society, 26, 608–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lynn, N., & Lea, S. (2003). ‘A phantom menace and the new apartheid’: The social construction of asylum seekers in the United Kingdom. Discourse and Society, 14, 425–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Macken-Horarik, M. (2003). Working the borders in racist discourse: The challenge of the ‘children overboard affair’ in news media texts. Social Semiotics, 13, 283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mares, P. (2001). Borderline. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
  38. McMaster, D. (2002). Asylum seekers and the insecurity of a nation. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 56, 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Messer, M., Schroeder, R., & Wodak, R. (2012). Migrations: Interdisciplinary perspectives. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nussbaum, M. C. (1999). Sex and social justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. O’Doherty, K., & Augoustinos, M. (2008). Protecting the nation: Nationalist rhetoric on asylum seekers and the Tampa. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 576–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Doherty, K., & LeCouteur, A. (2007). ‘Asylum seekers’, ‘boat people’ and ‘illegal immigrants’: Social categorization in the media. Australian Journal of Psychology, 59, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parliament of Australia. (2010). Boat arrivals in Australia since 1976. Retrieved 17 September, 2010, from http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/bn/sp/BoatArrivals.htm#_Toc233686296
  44. Perera, S. (2002). What is a camp...? Borderlands e-journal, 1(1).Google Scholar
  45. Pickering, S. (2001). Commonsense and original deviancy: News discourses and asylum seekers in Australia. Journal of Refugee Studies, 14, 170–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pickering, S. (2004). Border terror: Policing, forced migration and terrorism. Global Change, Peace and Security, 16, 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pugh, M. (2004). Drowning not waving: Boat people and humanitarianism at sea. Journal of Refugee Studies, 17, 50–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rothbart, M., & Taylor, M. (1992). Category and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? In G. R. Semin & K. Fieder (Eds.), Language and social cognition (pp. 11–36). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Saxton, A. (2003). ‘I certainly don’t want people like that here’: The discursive construction of ‘asylum seekers. Media International Australia, Incorportating Culture and Policy, 109, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smirnova, A. V. (2009). Reported speech as an element of argumentative newspaper discourse. Discourse & Communication, 3, 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tileagă, C. (2007). Ideologies of moral exclusion: A critical discursive reframing of depersonalization, delegitimization and dehumanization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 717–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. van Onselen, P. (2010, 3 April). Who’s afraid of 4500 boat people? The Australian.Google Scholar
  54. Walters, W. (2006). Border/control. European Journal of Social Theory, 9, 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wetherell, M. & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  56. White, P. R. R. (2006). Evaluative standpoints and ideological positioning in journalistic discourse: A new framework for analysis. In I. Lassen, J. Strunck, & T. Vestergaard (Eds.), Mediating ideology in text and image (pp. 37–69). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martha Augoustinos
    • 1
  • Clemence Due
    • 1
  • Peta Callaghan
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations