Advertisement

Child Sexual Abuse in Institutional and Non-institutional Contexts

  • Ben Mathews
Chapter
Part of the Child Maltreatment book series (MALT, volume 7)

Abstract

This chapter first focuses on major challenges confronting child and youth-serving organisations and high-risk settings. It then discusses the nature, key findings and major recommendations of Australia’s Royal Commission Into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, a landmark public inquiry into institutional sexual abuse, including a special focus on the Roman Catholic Church. The chapter then focuses on several recent examples of progress in responses to major problems presented by child sexual abuse in institutional and non-institutional settings. Developments from Australia in particular, but also from other countries, will show how new public health law responses, including through civil law, and with various emphases on primary prevention and secondary prevention, can create frameworks for enhanced prevention, identification, and response to cases of child sexual abuse. Some of these responses, such as redress schemes, reportable conduct schemes and child safe standards legislation, have specific application to institutional settings. Other responses, such as the abolition of statutes of limitation for civil claims for injuries caused by sexual abuse, and other kinds of legislative reporting duties, have broader application across society, as they apply to sexual abuse in all settings, whether within institutions, families, private settings, or other community settings. These responses are of broad application regarding prevention of child sexual abuse, early identification of child sexual offending, and ensuring appropriate responses once it is known or suspected. They are particularly relevant when dealing with high risk institutional settings and prolific individual offenders, both of which present especially urgent examples of the need for an appropriate societal approach to child sexual abuse informed by public health and social justice.

Keywords

Child sexual abuse generally, and in institutions and organisations Schools Churches Sports, cultural, arts and recreation settings Prevention approaches Australia’s Royal Commission Into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse Key case studies Catholic Church Major findings and reform recommendations in 2017 Key recent progress in reforms to enhance prevention, identification and responses to child sexual Abuse Legal reforms Public health reforms Institutional reforms Child safe standards for organisations Education and codes of conduct Reporting schemes Redress schemes Abolition of civil statutes of limitation 

References

  1. Alaggia, R. (2005). Disclosing the trauma of child sexual abuse: A gender analysis. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 10(5), 453–470.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders – Fifth edition (DSM-V). Arlington: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, M., & Green, C. (2001). Suppressing unwanted memories by executive control. Nature, 410, 366–369.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, M., & Hanslmayr, S. (2014). Neural mechanisms of motivated forgetting. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(6), 279–292.Google Scholar
  5. Anderst, J., Kellogg, N., & Jung, I. (2009). Reports of repetitive penile-genital penetration often have no definitive evidence of penetration. Pediatrics, 124(3), 403–409.Google Scholar
  6. Australian Government. (2013). Letters Patent for the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, S No 12 of 2013, 11 January 2013.Google Scholar
  7. Australian Government Royal Commission Into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. (2014). Interim Report. Sydney: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  8. Australian Government Royal Commission Into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. (2015a). Redress and civil litigation report. Sydney: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  9. Australian Government Royal Commission Into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. (2015b). Report of case study 13: The response of the Marist Brothers to allegations of child sexual abuse against Brothers Kostka Chute and Gregory Sutton. Sydney: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  10. Australian Government Royal Commission Into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. (2016). Report of case study 22: The response of Yeshiva Bondi and Yeshivah Melbourne to allegations of child sexual abuse made against people associated with those institutions. Sydney: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  11. Australian Government Royal Commission Into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. (2017a). Final report: Preface and executive summary. Sydney: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  12. Australian Government Royal Commission Into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. (2017b). Report of case study 34: The response of Brisbane Grammar School and St Paul’s School to allegations of child sexual abuse. Sydney: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  13. Australian Government Royal Commission Into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. (2017c). Analysis of claims of child sexual abuse made with respect to Catholic Church institutions in Australia. Sydney: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  14. Australian Government Royal Commission Into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. (2017d). Analysis of complaints of child sexual abuse received by Anglican church dioceses in Australia. Sydney: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  15. Beck, A.J., Harrison, P.M., & Guerino, P. (2010). Sexual victimization in juvenile facilities reported by youth, 2008–2009. Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  16. Beck, K., & Ogloff, J. (1995). Child abuse reporting in British Columbia: Psychologists’ knowledge of and compliance with the reporting law. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26(3), 245–251.Google Scholar
  17. Benoit, R., & Anderson, M. (2012). Opposing mechanisms support the voluntary forgetting of unwanted memories. Neuron, 76, 450–460.Google Scholar
  18. Bingham, T. (2007). The rule of law. Cambridge Law Journal, 66, 67–85.Google Scholar
  19. Böhm, B., Zollner, H., Fegert, J., & Liebhardt, H. (2014). Child sexual abuse in the context of the Roman Catholic Church: A review of literature from 1981–2013. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 23(6), 635–656.Google Scholar
  20. Boyle, P. (2014). How youth-serving organizations enable acquaintance molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(15), 2839–2848.Google Scholar
  21. Bulkley, J., & Horwitz, M. (1994). Adults sexually abused as children: Legal actions and issues. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 12, 65–87.Google Scholar
  22. Carmody, T. (2013). Taking responsibility: A roadmap for Queensland child protection. Brisbane: Queensland Child Protection Commission of Inquiry.Google Scholar
  23. Collin-Vézina, D., De La Sablonniere-Griffin, M., Palmer, A., & Milne, L. (2015). A preliminary mapping of individual, relational and social factors that impede disclosure of childhood sexual abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 43, 123–134.Google Scholar
  24. Cross, T., & Casanueva, C. (2009). Caseworker judgments and substantiation. Child Maltreatment, 14(1), 38–52.Google Scholar
  25. Cummins, P., Scott, D., & Scales, B. (2012). Report of the protecting Victoria’s vulnerable children inquiry. Melbourne: State of Victoria Department of Premier and Cabinet.Google Scholar
  26. Currie, D. (1978). Res judicata: The neglected defense. University of Chicago Law Review, 45, 317–350.Google Scholar
  27. Daly, K. (2014). Redressing institutional abuse of children. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Daly, K. (2017). Redress for historical institutional abuse of children. In A. Deckert & R. Sarre (Eds.), Australian and New Zealand handbook of criminology, crime, and justice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. De Jesus, I. (2016). ‘One woman’s journey out of child sex abuse helps reform Massachusetts child sex crimes law’. PENNLIVE.Google Scholar
  30. Dorbeck-Jung, B., Vrielink, M., Gosselt, J., van Hoof, J., & de Jong, M. (2010). Contested hybridization of regulation: Failure of the Dutch regulatory system to protect minors from harmful media. Regulation & Governance, 4, 154–174.Google Scholar
  31. Doyle, T. P., Sipe, A. W. R., & Wall, P. J. (2006). Sex, priests, and secret codes: The Catholic Church’s 2000-year paper trail of sexual abuse. Los Angeles: Volt Press.Google Scholar
  32. Drake, B., & Jonson-Reid, M. (2007). A response to Melton based on the best available data. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 343–360.Google Scholar
  33. Drake, B., & Pandey, S. (1996). Understanding the relationship between neighborhood poverty and child maltreatment. Child Abuse and Neglect, 20, 1003–1018.Google Scholar
  34. Drake, B., Jonson-Reid, M., Way, I., & Chung, S. (2003). Substantiation and recidivism. Child Maltreatment, 8, 248–260.Google Scholar
  35. Drake, B., & Jonson-Reid, M. (2015). Competing values and evidence: How do we evaluate mandated reporting and CPS response? In B. Mathews & D. Bross (Eds.), Mandatory reporting laws and the identification of severe child abuse and neglect (pp. 33–60). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Erooga, M. (2012a). Creating safer organisations: Practical steps to prevent the abuse of children by those working with them. Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
  37. Erooga, M. (2012b). Understanding and responding to people who sexually abuse children whilst employed in positions of trust: An overview of the relevant literature – Part One: Offenders. In M. Erooga (Ed.), Creating safer Organisations: Practical steps to prevent the abuse of children by those working with them (pp. 7–43). Malden: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Erooga, M., Allnock, D., & Telford, P. (2012). Sexual abuse of children by people in organisations: What offenders can teach us about protection. In M. Erooga (Ed.), Creating safer 250 organisations: Practical steps to prevent the abuse of children by those working with them (pp. 63–84). Malden: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Fallon, B., Trocmé, N., & MacLaurin, B. (2011). Should child protection services respond differently to maltreatment, risk of maltreatment, and risk of harm? Child Abuse & Neglect, 35, 236–239.Google Scholar
  40. Finkelhor, D. (2005). The main problem is underreporting child abuse and neglect. In D. Loseke, R. Gelles, & M. Cavanaugh (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (2nd ed., pp. 299–310). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Finkelhor, D., Hotaling, G., Lewis, I., & Smith, C. (1990). Sexual abuse in a national survey of adult men and women: Prevalence, characteristics, and risk factors. Child Abuse & Neglect, 14, 19–28.Google Scholar
  42. Fontes, L., & Plummer, C. (2010). Cultural issues in disclosures of child sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 19(5), 491–518.Google Scholar
  43. Ford, P. (2007). Review of the department for community development. Perth: Department for Community Development.Google Scholar
  44. Frawley-O’Dea, M. (2004). Psychosocial anatomy of the Catholic sexual abuse scandal. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 5, 121–137.Google Scholar
  45. Freyd, J. (1998). Science in the memory debate. Ethics & Behavior, 8, 101–113.Google Scholar
  46. Freyd, J., DePrince, A., & Zurbriggen, E. (2001). Self-reported memory for abuse depends on victim-perpetrator relationship. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation, 2, 5–16.Google Scholar
  47. Fryer, G., Bross, D., Krugman, R., Benson, D., & Baird, D. (1990). Good news for CPS workers. Public Welfare, 48(1), 38–41.Google Scholar
  48. Fung, D. S., & Chow, M. H. (1998). Doctors’ and lawyers’ perspectives of child abuse and neglect in Singapore. Singapore Medical Journal, 39(4), 160–165.Google Scholar
  49. Godden, N. (2010). Sexual abuse and claims in tort. Feminist Legal Studies, 18, 179–190.Google Scholar
  50. Hamilton, M. (2012). Child sex abuse in institutional settings: What is next. University of Detroit Mercy Law Review, 89, 421–440.Google Scholar
  51. Hansen, P., & Ainsworth, F. (2013). Australian child protection services: A game without end. International Journal of Social Welfare, 22, 104–110.Google Scholar
  52. Heger, A., Ticson, L., Velasquez, O., & Bernier, R. (2002). Children referred for possible sexual abuse: Medical findings in 2384 children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26, 645–659.Google Scholar
  53. Herman, J. L. (1997). Trauma and recovery. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  54. Holpuch, A. (2016). Windows closing for clergy sex abuse victims to sue Catholic Church. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  55. Hussey, J., Marshall, J. M., English, D., Knight, E., Lau, A. S., Dubowitz, H., & Kotch, J. B. (2005). Defining maltreatment according to substantiation: Distinction without a difference? Child Abuse and Neglect, 29, 279–292.Google Scholar
  56. Hutter, B. (2011). Negotiating social, economic and political environments: Compliance with regulation within and beyond the state. In V. Nielsen & C. Parker (Eds.), Explaining compliance (pp. 305–321). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  57. Kaufman, K. L., Holmberg, J. K., Orts, K. A., & Hilliker, D. (1998). Factors influencing sexual offenders’ modus operandi: An examination of victim-offender relatedness and age. Child Maltreatment, 3(4), 349–361.Google Scholar
  58. Kaufman, K. L., Tews, H., Schuett, J. M., & Kaufman, B. R. (2012). Prevention is better than cure: The value of situational prevention in organisations. In M. Erooga (Ed.), Creating safer Organisations: Practical steps to prevent the abuse of children by those working with them (pp. 140–166). West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
  59. Keenan, M. (2012). Child sexual abuse & the Catholic Church: Gender, power, and organizational culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Kempe, C. H., Silverman, F., Steele, B., Droegemueller, W., & Silver, H. (1962). The battered-child syndrome. Journal of the American Medical Association, 181, 17–24.Google Scholar
  61. Kenny, E. (2011). Enda Kenny speech on Cloyne report. https://www.rte.ie/news/2011/0720/303965-cloyne1/ Google Scholar
  62. Kenny, M. C., & Wurtele, S. K. (2012). Preventing childhood sexual abuse: An ecological approach. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 21(4), 361–367.Google Scholar
  63. Khan, S. (2018). Australian archbishop becomes most senior Catholic clergyman to be convicted of covering up child sex abuse. The Independent. 22 May.Google Scholar
  64. Kohl, P., Jonson-Reid, M., & Drake, B. (2009). Time to leave substantiation behind: Findings from a national probability study. Child Maltreatment, 14(17), 26.Google Scholar
  65. Koziol, M. (2018). Malcolm Turnbull blasts ‘indifference and resistance’ by churches in child sex abuse letter. Sydney Morning Herald. 28 March.Google Scholar
  66. Lanning, K., & Dietz, P. (2014). Acquaintance molestation and youth-serving organizations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(15), 2815–2838.Google Scholar
  67. Layton, R. (2003). Our best investment: A state plan to protect and advance the interests of children (Review of Child Protection in South Australia). Adelaide: Government of South Australia.Google Scholar
  68. Leahy, T., Pretty, G., & Tenenbaum, G. (2002). Prevalence of sexual abuse in organised competitive sport in Australia. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 8(2), 16–36.Google Scholar
  69. Leclerc, B., Wortley, R., & Smallbone, S. (2011). Getting into the script of adult child sex offenders and mapping out situational prevention measures. Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(2), 209–237.Google Scholar
  70. Leclerc, B., Feakes, J., & Cale, J. (2015). Child sexual abuse in youth-oriented organisations: Tapping into situational crime prevention from the offenders perspective. Crime Science, 4(1), 209–237.Google Scholar
  71. Lee, P.-Y., Fraser, J., & Chou, F.-H. (2007). Nurse reporting of known and suspected child abuse and neglect cases in Taiwan. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 23(3), 128–137.Google Scholar
  72. Letourneau, E., Nietert, P., & Rheingold, A. (2016). Initial assessment of stewards of children program effects on child sexual abuse reporting rates in selected South Carolina counties. Child Maltreatment, 21, 74–79.Google Scholar
  73. London, K., Bruck, M., Ceci, S., & Shuman, D. (2007). Disclosure of child sexual abuse: A review of the contemporary empirical literature. In M.-E. Pipe, M. Lamb, Y. Orbach, & A.-C. Cederborg (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: Disclosure, delay, and denial (pp. 11–39). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  74. Lothstein, L. (2004). Men of the flesh: The evaluation and treatment of sexually abusing priests. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 5, 167–195.Google Scholar
  75. MacMillan, D., & Jefferies, D. (1981). Sexual abuse of children: A police overview. Australian Crime Prevention Council Forum, 4(6), 17–23.Google Scholar
  76. Manning, J. (2000). The reasonable sexual abuse victim: “A grotesque invention of the law”? Torts Law Journal, 8, 1–9.Google Scholar
  77. Marr, D. (2014). The prince: Faith, Abuse & George Pell. Melbourne: Black.Google Scholar
  78. Mathews, B. (2003). Limitation periods and child sexual abuse cases: Law, psychology, time and justice. Torts Law Journal, 11(3), 218–243.Google Scholar
  79. Mathews, B. (2004a). Queensland government actions to compensate survivors of institutional abuse: A critical and comparative evaluation. Queensland University of Technology Law & Justice Journal, 4(1), 23–45.Google Scholar
  80. Mathews, B. (2004b). Post-Ipp special limitation periods for cases of injury to a child by a parent or close associate: New jurisdictional gulfs. Torts Law Journal, 12(3), 239–258.Google Scholar
  81. Mathews, B. (2012). Exploring the contested role of mandatory reporting laws in the identification of severe child abuse and neglect. In M. Freeman (Ed.), Current legal issues volume 14: Law and childhood studies (pp. 302–338). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Mathews, B. (2013). Legal cultural and practical developments in responding to female genital mutilation. In R. Maguire, B. Lewis, & C. Sampford (Eds.), Shifting global powers and international law: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 207–222). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  83. Mathews, B. (2014). Mandatory reporting Laws for child sexual abuse in Australia: A legislative history. Sydney: Royal Commission into institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse.Google Scholar
  84. Mathews, B. (2015). A theoretical framework for designing and evaluating strategies to identify cases of serious child abuse and neglect. In B. Mathews & D. Bross (Eds.), Mandatory reporting Laws and the identification of severe child abuse and neglect (pp. 127–156). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  85. Mathews, B. (2017). Optimising implementation of reforms to better prevent and respond to child sexual abuse in institutions: Insights from public health, regulatory theory, and Australia’s Royal Commission. Child Abuse and Neglect, 74, 86–98.Google Scholar
  86. Mathews, B., & Bross, D. (2008). Mandated reporting is still a policy with reason: Empirical evidence and philosophical grounds. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32(5), 511–516.Google Scholar
  87. Mathews, B., & Collin-Vézina, D. (2016). Child sexual abuse: Raising awareness and empathy is essential to promote new public health responses. Journal of Public Health Policy, 37(3), 304–314.Google Scholar
  88. Mathews, B., & Kenny, M. (2008). Mandatory reporting legislation in the USA, Canada and Australia: A cross-jurisdictional review of key features, differences and issues. Child Maltreatment, 13, 50–63.Google Scholar
  89. Mathews, B., Cronan, J., Walsh, K., Butler, D., & Farrell, A. (2008a). Teachers’ policy-based duties to report child sexual abuse: A comparative study. Australia & New Zealand Journal of Law & Education, 13(2), 23–37.Google Scholar
  90. Mathews, B., Fraser, J., Walsh, K., Dunne, M., Kilby, S., & Chen, L. (2008b). Queensland nurses’ attitudes towards and knowledge of the legislative duty to report child abuse and neglect: Results of a state-wide survey. Journal of Law and Medicine, 16, 288–304.Google Scholar
  91. Mathews, B., Goddard, C., Lonne, B., Short, S., & Briggs, F. (2009a). Developments in Australian laws requiring the reporting of suspected child sexual abuse. Children Australia, 34(3), 18–23.Google Scholar
  92. Mathews, B., Payne, H., Bonnet, C., & Chadwick, D. (2009b). A way to restore British paediatricians’ engagement with child protection. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 94, 329–332.Google Scholar
  93. Mathews, B., Walsh, K., Rassafiani, M., Butler, D., & Farrell, A. (2009c). Teachers reporting suspected child sexual abuse: Results of a three-state study. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 32(3), 772–813.Google Scholar
  94. Mathews, B., Bromfield, L., Walsh, K., & Vimpani, G. (2015). Child abuse and neglect: A socio-legal study of mandatory reporting in Australia –report for the Australian Government (Vol. 1–9). Brisbane: QUT.Google Scholar
  95. Mathews, B., Lee, X., & Norman, R. (2016). Impact of a new mandatory reporting law on reporting and identification of child sexual abuse: A seven-year time trend analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 56, 62–79.Google Scholar
  96. Mathews, B., Bromfield, L., Walsh, K., Cheng, Q., & Norman, R. (2017). Reports of child sexual abuse of boys and girls: Longitudinal trends over a 20-year period in Victoria, Australia. Child Abuse & Neglect, 66, 9–22.Google Scholar
  97. McClellan, P, The Honourable Justice. (2017). Address to the National Council of Churches.Google Scholar
  98. Melton, G. (2005). Mandated reporting: A policy without reason. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 9–18.Google Scholar
  99. Mercy, J., Rosenberg, M., Powell, K., Broome, C., & Roper, W. (1993). Public health policy for preventing violence. Health Affairs, 12(4), 7–29.Google Scholar
  100. Millar, R., Schneiders, B., & Vedelago, C. (2018). Catholic Inc. What the Church is really worth. The Age. 12 February.Google Scholar
  101. Milligan, L. (2017). Cardinal: The rise and fall of George Pell. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Murphy Commission of Investigation. (2009). Report into the Catholic archdiocese of Dublin. Dublin: Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform.Google Scholar
  103. Murphy Commission of Investigation. (2011). Report by Commission of Investigation into Catholic Diocese of Cloyne. Archdiocese of Cloyne.Google Scholar
  104. Palmer, D. (2016). The role of organizational culture in child sexual abuse in institutional contexts. Sydney: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  105. Parent, S., & Demers, G. (2011). Sexual abuse in sport: A model to prevent and protect athletes. Child Abuse Review, 20(2), 120–133.Google Scholar
  106. Parkinson, P. (2016). Submission to the Royal Commission on institutional responses to child sexual abuse issues paper 11: The Catholic Church.Google Scholar
  107. Parkinson, P., Oates, K., & Jayakody, A. (2012). Child sexual abuse in the Anglican Church of Australia. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 21(5), 553–570.Google Scholar
  108. Plummer, C. (2013). Using policies to promote child sexual abuse prevention: What is working? Harrisburg: VAW net, a project of the National Resource Center on Domestic Violence.Google Scholar
  109. Plummer, C., & Eastin, J. (2007). The effect of child sexual abuse allegations/investigations on the mother/child relationship. Violence Against Women, 13(10), 1053–1071.Google Scholar
  110. Residential Institutions Redress Board. (2011). Annual Report of the Residential Institutions Redress Board 2011.Google Scholar
  111. Rheingold, A., Zajac, K., Chapman, J., Patton, M., de Arellano, M., Saunders, B., et al. (2015). Child sexual abuse prevention training for childcare professionals: An independent multi-site randomized controlled trial of stewards of children. Prevention Science, 16(3), 374–385.Google Scholar
  112. Roach, K. (2001). Reforming statutes of limitations. University of New Brunswick Law Journal, 50, 25–55.Google Scholar
  113. Robertson, G. (2010). The case of the pope: Vatican accountability for human rights abuse. Camberwell: Penguin.Google Scholar
  114. Robinson, G. (2007). Confronting power and sex in the Catholic Church. Mulgrave: John Garratt.Google Scholar
  115. Rodriguez, C. (2016). Professionals’ attitudes and accuracy on child abuse reporting decisions in New Zealand. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17(3), 320–342.Google Scholar
  116. Ryan, P. (2009). The commission to inquire into child abuse. Dublin: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  117. Sarmas, L. (2008). Mixed messages on sexual assault and the statute of limitations. Melbourne University Law Review, 32, 609–638.Google Scholar
  118. Saul, J., & Audage, N. (2007). Preventing child sexual abuse within youth-serving organizations: Getting started on policies and procedures. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.Google Scholar
  119. Schaper, D. (2016). In aftermath of Hastert case, states push to change reporting of child sex abuse. NPR News.Google Scholar
  120. Scheflin, A., & Brown, D. (1996). Repressed memory or dissociative amnesia: What the science says. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 24, 143–188.Google Scholar
  121. Schneiders, B., Millar, R., & Vedelago, C. (2018). Catholic Church fails to confront tragedy of ‘epic proportions’. The Age. 10 March.Google Scholar
  122. Segal, L. (2015). Economic issues in the community response to child maltreatment. In B. Mathews & D. Bross (Eds.), Mandatory reporting laws and the identification of severe child abuse and neglect (pp. 193–218). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  123. Shakeshaft, C. (2004). Educator sexual misconduct: A synthesis of existing literature. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  124. Sipe, R. (2011). Scandal versus culture. In T. Plante & K. McChesney (Eds.), Sexual abuse in the Catholic Church: A decade of Crisis, 2002–2012 (pp. 117–129). Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  125. Smallbone, S. W., & Wortley, R. K. (2001). Child sexual abuse: Offender characteristics and modus operandi. Australian Institute of Criminology, 193, 1–6.Google Scholar
  126. Smallbone, S., Marshall, W. L., & Wortley, R. (2013). Preventing child sexual abuse: Evidence, policy and practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  127. Smith, C., & Freyd, J. (2014). Institutional betrayal. American Psychologist, 69, 575–587.Google Scholar
  128. Smith, D., Letourneau, E., Saunders, B., Kilpatrick, D., Resnick, H., & Best, C. (2000). Delay in disclosure of childhood rape: Results from a national survey. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(2), 273–287.Google Scholar
  129. Softestad, S., & Toverud, R. (2012). Parenting conditions in the midst of suspicion of child sexual abuse. Child and Family Social Work, 17, 75–84.Google Scholar
  130. Tapsell, K. (2014). Potiphar’s wife: The Vatican’s secret and child sexual abuse. Adelaide: ATF.Google Scholar
  131. Terry, K. (2015). Child sexual abuse within the Catholic Church: A review of global perspectives. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 39(2), 139–154.Google Scholar
  132. Terry, K. J., & Ackerman, A. (2008). Child sexual abuse in the Catholic Church: How situational crime prevention strategies can help create safe environments. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 643–657.Google Scholar
  133. Terry, K. J., & Freilich, J. D. (2012). Understanding child sexual abuse by Catholic priests from a situational perspective. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 21(4), 437–455.Google Scholar
  134. Terry, K., Smith, M., Schuth, K., Kelly, J., Vollman, B., & Massey, C. (2011). Causes and context of the sexual abuse crisis in the Catholic Church. Washington, DC: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.Google Scholar
  135. Valentine, K., Katz, I., Smyth, C., Bent, C., Rinaldis, S., Wade, C., et al. (2016). Key elements of child safe organizations. Sydney: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  136. Walsh, K., Berthelsen, D., Nicholson, J. M., Brandon, L., Stevens, J., & Rachele, J. N. (2013). Child sexual abuse prevention education: A review of school policy and curriculum provision in Australia. Oxford Review of Education, 39(5), 649–680.Google Scholar
  137. Williams, L. (1995). Recovered memories of abuse in women with documented child sexual victimization histories. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 8, 649–673.Google Scholar
  138. Wood, J. (2008). Report of the special committee of inquiry into child protection services in New South Wales. Sydney: Government of the State of New South Wales.Google Scholar
  139. Wright, K. (2017). Remaking collective knowledge: An analysis of the complex and multiple effects of inquiries into historical institutional child abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 74, 10–22.Google Scholar
  140. Wurtele, S. (2012). Preventing the sexual exploitation of minors in youth-serving organizations. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 2442–2453.Google Scholar
  141. Wurtele, S. (2014). Child sexual abuse prevention evaluation tool for organizations. On file with author.Google Scholar
  142. Yeung, K. (2004). Securing compliance. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ben Mathews
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of LawQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations