Skip to main content

REAL-T: Time Modularization in Reactive Distributed Applications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Computing (CCC 2018)

Abstract

In this paper, we propose REAL-T, a distributed event-based language with explicit support for time manipulation. The language introduces automata for operational time manipulation, causality constructs and Linear Temporal Logic for declarative time predicates, and a distributed-time aware event model. We have developed a compiler for the language and a dynamic run-time framework. To validate the proposal we study detection of complex patterns of security vulnerabilities in IoT scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/unicesi/eketal.

References

  1. Baier, C., Katoen, J.P.: Principles of Model Checking. MIT press, Cambridge (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Ban, B., Grinovero, S.: JGroups (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barringer, H., Goldberg, A., Havelund, K., Sen, K.: Program monitoring with LTL in EAGLE. In: 18th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium 2004, April 2004

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bellini, P., Mattolini, R., Nesi, P.: Temporal logics for real-time system specification. ACM Comput. Surv. 32(1), 12–42 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benavides Navarro, L.D., Barrera, A., Garcés, K., Arboleda, H.: Detecting and coordinating complex patterns of distributed events with KETAL. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 281, 127–141 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Benavides Navarro, L.D., Douence, R., Südholt, M.: Debugging and testing middleware with aspect-based control-flow and causal patterns. In: Issarny, V., Schantz, R. (eds.) Middleware 2008. LNCS, vol. 5346, pp. 183–202. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89856-6_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Benton, N., Cardelli, L., Fournet, C.: Modern concurrency abstractions for c#. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 26(5), 769–804 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Büchi, J.R.: Symposium on decision problems on a decision method in restricted second order arithmetic. Stud. Log. Found. Math. 44, 1–11 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, F., Roşu, G.: Java-MOP: a monitoring oriented programming environment for Java. In: Halbwachs, N., Zuck, L.D. (eds.) TACAS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3440, pp. 546–550. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31980-1_36

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, F., Roşu, G.: MOP: an efficient and generic runtime verification framework. In: ACM SIGPLAN Notices, vol. 42. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher, M.: An Introduction to Practical Formal Methods Using Temporal Logic. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Furia, C.A., Mandrioli, D., Morzenti, A., Rossi, M.: Modeling time in computing: a taxonomy and a comparative survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 42(2), 1–59 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Giannakopoulou, D., Lerda, F.: From states to transitions: improving translation of LTL formulae to Büchi automata. In: Peled, D.A., Vardi, M.Y. (eds.) FORTE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2529, pp. 308–326. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36135-9_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Harel, D.: Statecharts: a visual formalism for complex systems. Sci. Comput. Program. 8(3), 231–274 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6423(87)90035-9

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Haydar, M., Boroday, S., Petrenko, A., Sahraoui, H.: Propositional scopes in linear temporal logic. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Novelles Technologies de la Repartition (NOTERE 2005) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kiczales, G., et al.: Aspect-oriented programming. In: Akşit, M., Matsuoka, S. (eds.) ECOOP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1241, pp. 220–242. Springer, Heidelberg (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0053381

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Konur, S.: A survey on temporal logics for specifying and verifying real-time systems. Front. Comput. Sci. 7(3), 370–403 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Kröger, F., Merz, S.: Temporal Logic and State Systems. Springer, Berlin (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68635-4

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Lamport, L.: Time, clocks, and the ordering of events in a distributed system. Commun. ACM 21(7), 558–565 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee, I., Lee, K.: The internet of things (IoT): applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises. Bus. Horiz. 58(4), 431–440 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mattern, F., et al.: Virtual time and global states of distributed systems. Parallel Distrib. Algorithms 1(23), 215–226 (1989)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Meredith, P.O., Jin, D., Griffith, D., Chen, F., Roşu, G.: An overview of the MOP runtime verification framework. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 14(3), 249–289 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Møller, A.: dk.brics.automaton – finite-state automata and regular expressions for Java (2017). http://www.brics.dk/automaton/

  24. Naldurg, P., Sen, K., Thati, P.: A temporal logic based framework for intrusion detection. In: de Frutos-Escrig, D., Núñez, M. (eds.) FORTE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3235, pp. 359–376. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30232-2_23

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Ousterhout, J.: Why threads are a bad idea (for most purposes). In: Invited talk Given at USENIX Technical Conference (1996). https://web.stanford.edu/~ouster/cgi-bin/papers/threads.pdf

  26. Petri, C.A.: Fundamentals of a theory of asynchronous information flow. In: IFIP Congress (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  27. van Renesse, R., Birman, K.P., Maffeis, S.: Horus: a flexible group communication system. Commun. ACM 39(4), 76–83 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Robiah, Y., Rahayu, S.S., Shahrin, S., Faizal, M., Zaki, M.M., Marliza, R.: New multi-step worm attack model. arXiv preprint arXiv:1001.3477 (2010)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Daniel Benavides Navarro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Benavides Navarro, L.D. et al. (2018). REAL-T: Time Modularization in Reactive Distributed Applications. In: Serrano C., J., Martínez-Santos, J. (eds) Advances in Computing. CCC 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 885. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98998-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98998-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98997-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98998-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics