Advertisement

Urban Governance of Flooding in Myanmar: A Case Study of Bago

  • Graham Reeder
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

Urban flooding poses significant challenges to cities in Southeast Asia including loss of life, human displacement, and damaged infrastructure. As cities in the region grow and as the effects of climate change worsen, urban flooding is becoming more frequent and severe. This research situates flood governance in Bago City, Myanmar, in the literature on environmental governance and urban political ecology, investigating how local governance actors interpret the significance of flooding and how they promote urban climate governance. Using the 2015 Bago floods as a point of entry, results were derived from semi-structured interviews with (10) government officials and (22) key informants. Broadly, this research found that government officials interpreted the 2015 floods as extreme but also as an example of the government’s increasing capacity to respond to disasters, that local and regional governments lack the human and capital resources to take on the greater responsibility for flood management that they wish to, that government often fails to act on their knowledge about external causes of flooding such as land use and climate changes, and that government officials strategically adopt neoliberal paradigms advanced by international networks while reinterpreting them to advance their own goals of expanding the role of the state.

Keywords

Myanmar flood Climate change Flood governance 

References

  1. Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24(3):347–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16(3):268–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold M, Aung YT, Kempel S, Chit Saw KP (2015) Municipal governance in Myanmar: an overview of development affairs organizations. In: Policy dialogue brief, Series No. 7. The Asia FoundationGoogle Scholar
  4. Aye M (2017) Bago houses lost in landslide. Eleven Myanmar, 19 May. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20170519090959/https://www.elevenmyanmar.com/local/9508
  5. Bankoff G (2004) The historical geography of disaster: Vulnerability and local knowledge in western discourse. In: Mapping vulnerability: disasters, development and people. Earthscan, London, pp 25–37Google Scholar
  6. Berkes F (2007) Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons from resilience thinking. Nat Hazards 41(2):283–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Birkland TA, Burby RJ, Conrad D, Cortner H, Michener WK (2003) River ecology and flood hazard mitigation. Nat Hazards Rev 4(1):46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burki T (2015) Floods in Myanmar damage hundreds of health facilities. The Lancet 386(9996):843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cannon T (2000) Vulnerability analysis and disasters. In DJ Parker (ed) Floods, vol 1. Routledge, New York, pp 45–55Google Scholar
  10. Cannon T, Müller-Mahn D (2010) Vulnerability, resilience and development discourses in context of climate change. Nat Hazards 55(3):621–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cazdyn E (2012) The already dead: The new time of politics, culture, and illness. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  12. Chit Saw KP, Arnold M (2016) Administering the state in Myanmar: an overview of the general administration. In: Policy dialogue brief, Series No. 6. The Asia FoundationGoogle Scholar
  13. Collins TW (2010) Marginalization, facilitation, and the production of unequal risk: the 2006 Paso del Norte floods. Antipode 42(2):258–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cornwall A (2007) Buzzwords and fuzzwords: deconstructing development discourse. Dev in Pract 17(4–5):471–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dai L, Korolev KS, Gore J (2015) Relation between stability and resilience determines the performance of early warning signals under different environmental drivers. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(32):10056–10061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duda AM, El-Ashry MT (2000) Addressing the global water and environment crises through integrated approaches to the management of land, water and ecological resources. Water Int 25(1):115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dundes A (ed) (1988) The flood myth. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  18. Felli R, Castree N (2012) Neoliberalising adaptation to environmental change: foresight or foreclosure? Environ Plann A 44(1):1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. AMBIO: J Hum Environ 31(5):437–440Google Scholar
  20. Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L, Bunce A, McKay C, Irwin M, Pearce T (2015) The status of climate change adaptation in Africa and Asia. Reg Environ Change 15:801–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foucault M (1991) Governmentality. In: Burchell G, Gordon C, Miller P (eds) The foucault effect: studies in governmentality. Harvester Wheatsheaf, London, pp 87–104Google Scholar
  22. Friend R, Moench M (2013) What is the purpose of urban climate resilience? Implications for addressing poverty and vulnerability. Urban Climate 6:98–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fritz HM, Blount CD, Thwin S, Thu MK, Chan N (2009) Cyclone Nargis storm surge in Myanmar. Nat Geosci 2(7):448–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garschagen M (2015) Risky change? Vietnam’s urban flood risk governance between climate dynamics and transformation. Pacific Affairs 88(3):599–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garschagen M, Romero-Lankao P (2015) Exploring the relationships between urbanization trends and climate change vulnerability. Clim Change 133(1):37–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Godschalk DR (2003) Urban hazard mitigation: creating resilient cities. Nat Hazards Rev 4(3):136–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hook D, Than TM, Ninh KN (2015) Conceptualizing public sector reform in Myanmar. In: Policy dialogue brief, Series No. 2. The Asia Foundation, YangonGoogle Scholar
  29. Huq S, Reid H, Konate M, Rahman A, Sokona Y, Crick F (2004) Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change in least developed countries (LDCs). Clim Policy 4(1):25–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. In: Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Qin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Plattner GK, Allen SK, Tignor M, Midgley PM (eds) A special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  31. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  32. Ishaya S, Abaje IB (2008) Indigenous people’s perception on climate change and adaptation strategies in Jema’a local government area of Kaduna State, Nigeria. J Geogr Reg Plann 1(8):138Google Scholar
  33. James H, Paton D (2015) Social capital and the cultural contexts of disaster recovery outcomes in Myanmar and Taiwan. Glob Change Peace Secur 27(2):207–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Janssen MA, Ostrom E (2006) Resilience, vulnerability, and adaptation: a cross-cutting theme of the International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change. Glob Environ Change 16(3):237–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones Lee (2014) The political economy of Myanmar’s transition. J Contemp Asia 44(1):144–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kreft S, Eckstein D, Melchior I (2016) Global climate risk index 2017: who suffers most from extreme weather events? Weather-related loss events in 2015 and 1996 to 2015. Germanwatch Nord-Süd Initiative, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  37. Liao K (2012) A theory on urban resilience to floods—a basis for alternative planning practices. Ecol Soc 17(4):48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MacKinnon D, Derickson KD (2013) From resilience to resourcefulness: a critique of resilience policy and activism. Prog Hum Geogr 37(2):253–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. MacLean K (2007) Spaces of extraction: governance along the riverine networks of Nyaunglebin District. In Skidmore M, Wilson T (eds) Myanmar: the state, community, and the environment. Australian National University Press and Asia Pacific Press, Canberra, pp 246–270Google Scholar
  40. Marks D (2015) The urban political ecology of the 2011 floods in Bangkok: the creation of uneven vulnerabilities. Pac Aff 88(3):623–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McGranahan G, Balk D, Anderson B (2007) The rising tide: assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environ Urbanization 19(1):17–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller F, Osbahr H, Boyd E, Thomalla F, Bharwani S, Ziervogel G, Walker B, Birkmann J, Van der Leeuw S, Rockström J, Hinkel J, Downing T, Folke C, Nelson D (2010) Resilience and vulnerability: complementary or conflicting concepts? Ecol Soc 15(3):11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M, Hirsch RM, Kundzewicz ZW, Lettenmaier DP, Stouffer RJ (2008) Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science 319:573–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. MoNREC (2017) Myanmar climate change strategy and action plan. The Republic of the Union of Myanmar, Nay Pyi Taw, MyanmarGoogle Scholar
  45. Myint UT (2007) The river of lost footsteps: histories of Burma. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. National Research Council (2013) Levees and the National Flood Insurance Program: improving policies and practices. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.  https://doi.org/10.17226/18309
  47. Nixon H, Joelene C (2016) Fiscal decentralization in Myanmar. In: Policy dialogue brief, Series No. 5. The Asia Foundation, YangonGoogle Scholar
  48. Nyong A, Adesina F, Osman Elasha B (2007) The value of indigenous knowledge in climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies in the African Sahel. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 12(5):787–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. O’Malley P (2010) Resilient subjects: uncertainty, warfare and liberalism. Econ Soc 39(4):488–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pelling M (1998) Participation, social capital and vulnerability to urban flooding in Guyana. J Int Dev 10(4):469–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Perrings C (2006) Resilience and sustainable development. Environ Dev Econ 11(4):417–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Phillips K (2017, June 26) Uncertainty fuels anxiety, exodus in Dry Zone. Democratic voice of Burma. Retrieved from http://www.dvb.no/feature/climate-of-uncertainty-fuels-anxiety-exodus-in-dry-zone/76127
  53. Rasid H, Paul BK (1987) Flood problems in Bangladesh: is there an indigenous solution? Environ Manage 11(2):155–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Renn O (2011) The social amplification/attenuation of risk framework: application to climate change. Wiley Interdisc Rev: Clim Change 2(2):154–169Google Scholar
  55. Rose G (2001) Discourse analysis I: text, intertextuality and context. In: Visual methodologies: an introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. Sage, London, pp 135–163Google Scholar
  56. Rosenzweig C, Solecki WD, Hammer SA, Mehrotra S (eds) (2011) Climate change and cities: first assessment report of the urban climate change research network. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  57. Sapountzaki K (2007) Social resilience to environmental risks: a mechanism of vulnerability transfer? Manag Environ Qual: Int J 18(3):274–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smith M (1994) Paradise lost?: the suppression of environmental rights and freedom of expression in Burma. Article 19Google Scholar
  59. Sway K (2017, May 3) National climate change policy finalised. Myanmar Times. Retrieved from http://www.mmtimes.com/index.php/national-news/yangon/25824-national-climate-change-policy-finalised.html
  60. Swyngedouw E, Heynen NC (2003) Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale. Antipode 35(5):898–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. UN-DESA (United Nations Department for Economic and Social Affairs) (2012) World urbanization prospects: the 2011 revision: online data, country profiles. Retrieved from http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/unup/index_panel3.html
  62. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations Environment Program, World Bank and World Resources Institute (2000) World Resources 2000–2001: people and ecosystems: the fraying web of life. United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Environment Program, World Bank and World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.wri.org/publication/world-resources-2000-2001
  63. UN-HABITAT (2011) The state of Asian cities 2010/11. UNESCAP & UN-HABITAT, Fukuoka, JapanGoogle Scholar
  64. Walker J, Cooper M (2011) Genealogies of resilience: from systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Secur Dialogue 42(2):143–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Walker B, Carpenter S, Anderies J, Abel N, Cumming G, Janssen M, Pritchard R (2002) Resilience management in social-ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conserv Ecol 6(1)Google Scholar
  66. Wassmann R, Jagadish SVK, Sumfleth K, Pathak H, Howell G, Ismail A, Serraj R, Redona E, Singh RK, Heuer S (2009) Regional vulnerability of climate change impacts on Asian rice production and scope for adaptation. Adv Agron 102:91–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Win RN, Reiji S, Shinya T (2009) Forest cover changes under selective logging in the Kabaung Reserved Forest, Bago Mountains, Myanmar. Mt Res Dev 29(4):328–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wisner B, Walker P (2005) Beyond Kobe: a proactive look at the World Conference on Disaster Reduction–18–22 January 2005, Kobe, Japan. Swiss Department of Humanitarian Aid, Feinstein International Famine Center, MedfordGoogle Scholar
  69. Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  70. World Bank Group (2017) Global economic prospects, June 2017: a fragile recovery. Washington, DC: World Bank. World Bank. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/26800
  71. Ye Htut A, Shrestha S, Nitivattananon V, Kawasaki A (2014) Forecasting climate change scenarios in the Bago River Basin, Myanmar. J Earth Sci Climatic Change 5(9):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zaw SS (2016) Post-Nargis lives: after the storm—comes the new hope? In: Tantikanangkul W Pritchard A (eds) Politics of autonomy and sustainability in Myanmar. Springer, Singapore, pp 57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zevenbergen C, Gersonius B (2007) Challenges in urban flood management. In: Ashley R, Garvin S, Pasche E, Vassilopoulos A, Zevenbergen C (eds) Advances in urban flood management. Taylor & Francis, New York, USA, pp 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203945988Google Scholar
  74. Zin WW, Kawasaki A, Win S (2015) River flood inundation mapping in the Bago River Basin, Myanmar. Hydrol Res Lett 9(4):97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.York UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations