Advertisement

Public Value, Governance Models and Co-Creation in Smart Cities

  • Manuel Pedro Rodríguez BolívarEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 35)

Abstract

Public value creation is the new lens for analyzing smart cities. Based on participative governance models, local governments in smart cities must provide the tools and context to foster citizen engagement in public decisions and co-creation of public services. All this have to be addressed to increase the quality of life of citizens in their urban life. So, technological advances implemented in city governments should provide an ideal frame to support the engagement and participation of citizens in the city life. Researches included into the book are clear examples of this issue.

Keywords

Public value Governance models Co-creation 

References

  1. Albert, A., & Passmore, E. (2008) Public value and participation: A literature review for the Scottish government (p. 23). Scottish Government Social Research.Google Scholar
  2. Alford, J., & Hughes, O. (2008). Public value pragmatism as the next phase of public management. The American Review of Public Administration, 38, 130–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen, K. V., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2006). E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly, 23, 236–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2012). Stewards, mediators, and catalysts: Toward a model of collaborative leadership. The Innovation Journal, 17, 1–21.Google Scholar
  5. Baccarne, B., Mechant, P., & Schuurman, D. (2014). Empowered cities? An analysis of the structure and generated value of the smart city Ghent. In Smart city (pp. 157–182). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Baccarne, B., Schuurman, D., Mechant, P., & De Marez, L. (2014). The role of urban living labs in a smart city. XXV ISPIM Innovation Conference, Proceedings (pp. 1–14).Google Scholar
  7. Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., … Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214, 481–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bélissent, J. (2010). Getting clever about smart cities: New opportunities require new business models. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research, Inc..Google Scholar
  10. Benington, J. (2011). From private choice to public value. In J. Benington & M. H. Moore (Eds.), Public value - Theory and practice (pp. 31–51). Basingstoke, England: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
  11. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Crowd-sourcing transparency: ICTs, social media, and government transparency initiatives. 11th Annual International Conference Digital Government Research (dg.o 2010) (pp. 51–58).Google Scholar
  12. Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). From engagement to co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23, 1119–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Castelnovo, W. (2015) Citizens as sensors/information providers in the co-production of smart city services. 12th Conference of the Itailian Chapter of AIS (pp. 51–62).Google Scholar
  14. Castelnovo, W., Misuraca, G., & Savoldelli, A. (2016). Smart cities governance: The need for a holistic approach to assessing urban participatory policy making. Social Science Computer Review, 34, 724–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., … Scholl, H. J. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 2289–2297).Google Scholar
  16. Coe, A., Paquet, G., & Roy, J. (2001). E-governance and smart communities - A social learning challenge. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cosgrave, E., & Tryfonas, T. (2012) Exploring the relationship between Smart City policy and implementation. The First International Conference on Smart Systems, Devices and Technologies (pp. 79–82).Google Scholar
  18. Cosgrave, E., Tryfonas, T., & Crick, T. (2014). The smart city from a public value perspective. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference ICT for Sustainability (pp. 369–377).Google Scholar
  19. European Commission. (2011). Empowering people, driving change. Social innovation in the European Union. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  20. European Parliament. (2014). Mapping smart cities in the EU. Brussels, European Parliament. Availiable at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2014/507480/IPOLITRE_ET(2014)507480_EN.pdf (accessed December 11, 2018).
  21. Gains, F., & Stoker, G. (2009). Delivering “public value”: Implications for accountability and legitimacy. Parliamentary Affairs, 62, 438–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harrison, C., Eckman, B., Hamilton, R., Hartswick, P., Kalagnanam, J., Paraszczak, J., & Williams, P. (2010). Foundations for smarter cities. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 54, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hepburn, P. (2015). Smart cities: Just how clever does local government need to be? Lessons from a case study on co-creating digital applications for elderly people. RC21 International Conference on “The Ideal City: Between myth and reality. Representations, policies, contradictions and challenges for tomorrow’s urban life” (pp. 859–867).Google Scholar
  24. Khan, Z., Ludlow, D., Loibl, W., & Soomro, K. (2014). ICT enabled participatory urban planning and policy development: The UrbanAPI project. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8, 205–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koppenjan, J., & Klijn, E.-H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks: A network approach to problem solving and decision making. London, England: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, J. H., Phaal, R., & Lee, S. H. (2013). An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 286–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Linders, D. (2013). Towards open development: Leveraging open data to improve the planning and coordination of international aid. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 426–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lund, D. H. (2018). Co-creation in urban governance: From inclusion to innovation. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 22, 3–17.Google Scholar
  29. Meijer, A. J., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2016). Smart city research: Contextual conditions, governance models, and public value assessment. Social Science Computer Review, 34, 647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mintrom, M., & Luetjens, J. (2017). Creating public value: Tightening connections between policy design and public management. Policy Studies Journal, 45, 170–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Nam, T. (2012). Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via government 2.0. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Flynn, J. (2007). From new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66, 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oxendine, A., Sullivan, J. L., Borgida, E., Riedel, E., Jackson, M., & Dial, J. (2007). The importance of political context for understanding civic engagement: A longitudinal analysis. Political Behavior, 29, 31–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Paletti, A. (2016). Co-production through ICT in the public sector: When citizens reframe the production of public services. In Digitally supported innovation (pp. 141–152). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parycek, P., & Pereira, G. V. (2017). Drivers of Smart Governance: Towards to evidence-based policy-making. dg.o ’17 Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 564–565).Google Scholar
  37. Pereira, G. V., Macadar, M. A., Luciano, E. M., & Testa, M. G. (2017). Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a smart city context. Information Systems Frontiers, 19, 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pereira, G. V., Parycek, P., Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2018). Smart governance in the context of smart cities: A literature review. Information Polity, 23, 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pinnegar, S., Marceau, J., & Randolph, B. (2008). Innovation for a carbon constrained city: Challenges for the built environment industry. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 10, 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2016). Characterizing the role of governments in smart cities: A literature review. In J. R. Gil-Garcia (Ed.), Smarter as the new urban agenda: A comprehensive view of the 21st century city (Public administration and information technology) (pp. 49–71). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2017a). Policy makers’ perceptions on the transformational effect of Web 2.0 technologies on public services delivery. Electronic Commerce Research, 17, 227–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2017b). Governance models and outcomes to foster public value creation in smart cities. 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2017) (pp. 521–530).Google Scholar
  43. Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2018). Governance in smart cities: A comparison of practitioners’ perceptions and prior research. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 7, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., & López-Quiles, J. M. (2018). The quest for the quality of life in European smart cities. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research Governance in the Data Age - dgo ’18 (pp. 1–15).Google Scholar
  45. Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., & Meijer, A. J. (2016). Smart governance: Using a literature review and empirical analysis to build a research model. Social Science Computer Review, 34, 673–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rodríguez-Bolívar, M. P. (2015). Smart cities: Big cities, complex governance? In Transforming city governments for successful smart cities. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roy, J. (2013). From machinery to mobility: Government and democracy in a participative age (Public administration and information technology). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2019). The relevance of Public Value into Smart Cities. In Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P. (ed.). Setting Foundations for the Creation of Public Value in Smart Cities, Springer.Google Scholar
  49. Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Aguas, M., Almirall, E., Bakici, T., … Hielkema, H. (2012). Fireball white paper. Smart cities as innovation ecosystems sustained by the future internet. Technical Paper. White Paper on Smart Cities as Innovation Ecosystems. Available at: https://www.hal.inria.fr/hal-00769635/document (accessed December 11, 2018).
  50. Scholl, H. J., & Scholl, M. C. (2014) Smart governance: A roadmap for research and practice. Proceedings of the 9th iConference (pp. 163–176).Google Scholar
  51. Shirky, C. (2011). The political of social power media the public sphere, and political change technology. Foreign Affairs, 90, 28–41.Google Scholar
  52. Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36, 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Testoni, C., & Boeri, A. (2015). Smart governance: Urban regeneration and integration policies in Europe. Turin and Malmö case studies. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 6, 527–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17, 1333–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yigitcanlar, T., Velibeyoglu, K., & Martinez-Fernandez, C. (2008). Rising knowledge cities: The role of urban knowledge precincts. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12, 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Accounting and FinanceUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations