Nurturing Bodies: Exploring Discourses of Parental Leave as Communicative Practices of Affective Embodiment

  • Sine N. JustEmail author
  • Robyn V. Remke


Focusing on discourses of parental leave, we explore how certain bodies became visible and valuable in work contexts, whereas others are neglected/rejected. To this end, we study “the work-body relation as an indeterminate symbolic-material object constituted in communication” (Ashcraft, Knowing work through the communication of difference: a revised agenda for difference studies. In: Mumby DK (ed) Reframing difference in organizational communication studies: research, pedagogy, practice. Sage, Los Angeles, pp. 3–30, 2011). And we develop a conceptual framework for analyzing communicative practices of affective embodiment, understood as patterned utterances that endow specific relations between discourses and materialities with affective charges (intensity and valence). Such practices, we argue, constitute the individual and collective identities involved; they enable (and delimit) the embodiment of parental leave. We explore four such embodiments to illustrate how parenting and parental leave has not only become more visible and viable for some employees but also continues to be a privilege not available to all.


  1. Ahmed, Sara. 2004. The cultural politics of emotion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, Brenda J. 2011. Difference matters: Communicating social identity. 2nd ed. Long Grove: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ashcraft, Karen L. 2011. Knowing work through the communication of difference: A revised agenda for difference studies. In Reframing difference in organizational communication studies: Research, pedagogy, practice, ed. Dennis K. Mumby, 3–30. Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashcraft, Karen L., and Dennis K. Mumby. 2004. Reworking gender. A feminist communicology of organization. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Ashcraft, Karen L., Timothy R. Kuhn, and Cooren Franҫois. 2009. Constitutional amendments: “Materializing” organizational communication. Academy of Management Annals 3 (1): 1–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bävman, Johan. 2016. Swedish dads. Available at:
  7. Belkin, Lisa. 2003. The opt-out revolution. The New York Times Magazine, October 26.
  8. Billing, Lynzy. 2015. This is what it looks like when men are allowed to take 480 days of paternity leave. Buzzfeed, March 25, 20–15.
  9. Birchall, Jonathan. 2010. Criticism that spread like a rash. Financial Times, May 27. Available at:
  10. Brennan, Teresa. 2004. The transmission of affect. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2004. Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Buzzanell, Patrice M., Rebecca Meisenbach, Robyn V. Remke, Meina Liu, Venessa Bowers, and Cindy Conn. 2005. The good working mother: Managerial women’s sensemaking and feelings about work–family issues. Communication Studies 56 (3): 261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buzzanell, Patrice M., Rebecca L. Dohrman, and Suzy D’Enbeau. 2011. Problematizing political economy differences and their respective work-life policy constructions. In Reframing difference in organizational communication studies: Research, pedagogy, practice, ed. Dennis K. Mumby. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Carlson, Nicholas. 2013. Marissa Mayer doubles Yahoo’s paid maternity leave gives dads eight weeks off. Business Insider, April 30. Available at:
  16. Cederström, Carl, and André Spicer. 2014. Discourse of the real kind: A post-foundational approach to organizational discourse analysis. Organization 21 (2): 178–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Filipovic, Jill. 2015. This photographer wants to change the way you see fatherhood. Cosmopolitan, April 1. Available at:
  18. Finkelstein, Sarina. 2015. These photos show what makes Sweden a great place to be a dad. Time, June 19. Available at:
  19. Garcia, Patricia. 2016. Why Mark Zuckerberg’s paternity leave is beneficial for all working dads – And moms. Vogue, January 7. Available at:
  20. Golden, Annis G. 2009. Employee families and organizations as mutually enacted environments: A sensemaking approach to work—Life interrelationships. Management Communication Quarterly 22 (3): 385–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guynn, Jessica. 2013. Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer causes uproar with telecommuting ban. Los Angeles Times, February 26. Available at:
  22. Hennessey, Ray. 2016. Did Mark Zuckerberg really take ‘paternity leave’? Entrepreneur, January 27. Available at:
  23. Kanter, Rosabeth M. 1977. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Latvala, Charlotte. n.d. The new stay-at-home mom. Parenting. Available at:
  25. Lewis, Liz. 2015. I hated being a stay-at-home mom. Huffington Post, December 9. Available at:
  26. Litvin, Deborah R. 2002. The business case for diversity and the “iron cage”. In Casting the other: The production and maintenance of inequalities in work organizations, 160–184. London: Routledge. Barbara Czarniawska and Heather Höpfl.Google Scholar
  27. Mayer, Marissa. n.d. Marissa Mayer. Available at:
  28. Miller, Lisa. 2012. Can Marissa Mayer really have it all? New York, October 7. Available at:
  29. Mumby, Dennis K. 2011. Organizing difference: An introduction. In Reframing difference in organizational communication studies: Research, pedagogy, practice, ed. Dennis K. Mumby, vii–xiii. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. NYAM. 2016. A lot can happen in 4 years, March 31. Available at:
  31. Prasad, Pushkala, Judith K. Pringle, and Alison M. Konrad. 2006. Examining the contours of workplace diversity: Concepts, contexts, and challenges. In Handbook of workplace diversity, ed. Alison Konrad, Pushkala Prasad, and Judith K. Pringle, 1–22. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Putnam, Linda L., Jody Jahn, and Jane Stuart Baker. 2011. Intersecting difference: A dialectical perspective. In Reframing difference in organizational communication studies: Research, pedagogy, practice, ed. Dennis K. Mumby, 31–54. Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rangecroft, Andrea. 2016. Where new dads are encouraged to take months off work. BBC, January 6. Available at:
  34. Rottenberg, Catherine. 2014. The rise of neoliberal feminism. Cultural Studies 28 (3): 418–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sparks, Colin. 2001. The internet and the global public sphere. In Mediated politics. Communication in the future of democracy, ed. W. Lance Bennett and Robert M. Entman, 75–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Stevens, Lauren B. 2013. Feeling reflective. Available at:
  37. Stevens, Lauren. 2014. The dark side of mommy blogs. Huffington Post, October 23.
  38. Tepper, Taylor. 2015. Facebook workers just got a better parental leave policy. Here’s when you’ll get yours. Time, December 3. Available at:
  39. Tracy, Sarah J., and Kendra Dyanne Rivera. 2010. Endorsing equity and applauding stay-at-home moms: How male voices on work-life reveal aversive sexism and flickers of transformation. Management Communication Quarterly 24 (1): 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Warner, Judith. 2013. The op-out generation wants back in. The New York Times Magazine, August 17. Available at:
  41. Weisberg, Jacob. 2013. Yahoo’s Marissa Mayer: Hail to the chief. Vogue, August 16. Available at:

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication and ArtsRoskilde UniversityRoskildeDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Leadership and ManagementLancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations