Blockchain-Based Decentralized Business Models in the Sharing Economy: A Technology Adoption Perspective
Recently, blockchain technology has increasingly been deemed to enable novel “decentralized” business models for the sharing economy and thereby potentially provide an alternative to extant “centralized” sharing economy business models. Using a technology adoption perspective, our chapter explores under which circumstances such blockchain-based decentralized sharing economy business models may be widely adopted. Building on extant research, we theorize on the factors that are relevant for adoption from the individual users’ perspective. We then derive eight potential adoption scenarios of blockchain-based decentralized sharing economy business models and explore adoption using an agent-based simulation for the short term vs. long term. Our analyses highlight the relatively high importance of individual attitudes toward decentralized business models vis-à-vis contextual influences and show how adoption patterns vary depending on the time horizon for the different scenarios. We conclude our exploratory study by deriving research and practical implications for blockchain-based business models.
KeywordsSharing economy Business models Blockchain Technology adoption Agent-based modeling
- Abramova, S., & Boehme, R. (2016). Perceived benefit and risk as multidimensional determinants of bitcoin use: a quantitative exploratory study. Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Information Systems, 1–20.Google Scholar
- Alden, K., Timmis, J., & Coles, M. (2014). Easing parameter sensitivity analysis of NetLogo simulations using SPARTAN. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems, 622–628.Google Scholar
- Beck, R., Müller-Bloch, C., & King, J. L. (2018). Governance in the blockchain economy – a framework and research agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 19(3). Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- BlockchainHub. (2017). Blockchains & distributed ledger technologies. https://blockchainhub.net/blockchains-and-distributed-ledger-technologies-in-general/. Accessed 22 Mar 2018.
- Botsman, R. (2015). Defining the sharing economy: What is collaborative consumption – and what isn’t?. https://www.fastcompany.com/3046119/defining-the-sharing-economy-what-is-collaborative-consumption-and-what-isnt. Accessed 22 Mar 2018.
- Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2011). What’s mine is yours: How collaborative consumption is changing the way we live. London: Collins.Google Scholar
- Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York/London: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- De Filippi, P. (2017). What blockchain means for the sharing economy. Harvard Business Review Digital Articles, 2–5. http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.is.ed.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=122087609&site=ehost-live
- Deloitte. (2017). Deloitte survey: Blockchain reaches beyond financial services with some industries moving faster. https://www2.deloitte.com/hr/en/pages/press/articles/blockchain-2017.html. Accessed 27 Mar 2018.
- Dutra, A., Tumasjan, A., & Welpe, I. M. (2018). Blockchain is changing how media and entertainment companies compete. MIT Sloan Management Review, 59(1), 39–45.Google Scholar
- Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2017). Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Information Systems Frontiers, 110(3), 392–407.Google Scholar
- Edelman, B. G., & Geradin, D. (2016). Efficiencies and regulatory shortcuts: How should we regulate companies like Airbnb and Uber? Stanford Technology Law Review, 19(2), 293–328.Google Scholar
- Epstein, J. M. (2012). Generative social science: Studies in agent-based computational modeling, Princeton studies in complexity 11. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Folkinshteyn, D., Glassboro, N. J., Lennon, M., Altoona, P. A., & Reilly, T. (2015). A tale of twin tech: Bitcoin and the WWW. Journal of Strategic and International Studies, X(2), 82–90.Google Scholar
- Friedlmaier, M., Tumasjan, A., & Welpe, I. M. (2018). Disrupting industries with blockchain: The industry, venture capital funding, and regional distribution of blockchain ventures. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3517–3526Google Scholar
- Gencer, A. E., Basu, S., Eyal, I., van Renesse, R., & Sirer, E. G. (2018). Decentralization in bitcoin and ethereum networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.03998. https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.03998.
- Gupta, V. (2017). A brief history of blockchain. Harvard Business Review, 2–4.Google Scholar
- Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2017). The truth about blockchain. Harvard Business Review, 95(1), 118–127.Google Scholar
- Jarvenpaa, S., & Teigland, R. (2017). Trust in digital environments: From the sharing economy to decentralized autonomous organizations. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; HICSS, 5812–5816.Google Scholar
- Jeffries, A. ‘Blockchain’ is meaningless. https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/7/17091766/ blockchain-bitcoin-ethereum-cryptocurrency-meaning. Accessed 27 Mar 2018.
- Malhotra, Y., & Galletta, D. F. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: theoretical bases and empirical validation. Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; HICSS.Google Scholar
- Matzler, K., Veider, V., & Kathan, W. (2015). Adapting to the sharing economy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 56(2), 71–77.Google Scholar
- Moore, G. A. (2014). Crossing the chasm: Marketing and selling disruptive products to mainstream customers (3rd. ed.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
- Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2017.
- Patterson, S. (2016). Openbazaar in depth: Interview with COO Sam Patterson. http://bitcoinist.com/openbazaar-in-depth-interview-with-coo-sam-patterson/. Accessed 25 Mar 2018.
- Porru, S., Pinna, A., Marchesi, M., & Tonelli, R. (2017). Blockchain-oriented software engineering: challenges and new directions. Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion, 169–171.Google Scholar
- Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovation (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Schneck, P., Tumasjan, A., & Welpe, I. M. (2018). Disrupting the disruptors? An in-depth analysis of the implications of blockchain technology for today’s sharing economy (Working Paper).Google Scholar
- Seidel, M. D. L. (2017). Questioning centralized organizations in a time of distributed trust. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
- Seidl, R. (2014). Social scientists, qualitative data, and agent-based modeling. Proceedings ot the Social Simulation Conference, 1–4.Google Scholar
- Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016a). Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind Bitcoin is changing money, business and the world. London: Portfolio Penguin.Google Scholar
- Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016b). The impact of the blockchain goes beyond financial services. Harvard Business Review, 10, 2–5.Google Scholar
- Treiblmaier, H. (2017). The world isn’t static, so why are we? How agent based modeling helps to create and test dynamic IS models and theories. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
- Tumasjan, A. (2018). Blockchain-Technologie und das Internet of Things: Kurzfristiger Hype oder eine Symbiose für neue IoT-Geschäftsmodelle? Industrie 4.0 Management, 24(2), 29–32.Google Scholar
- Valenta, M., & Sandner, P. (2017). Comparison of Ethereum, Hyperledger Fabric and Corda (FSBC Working Paper).Google Scholar
- Walker, M. J. (2017). Hype cycle for emerging technologies 2017. https://www.gartner.com/doc/3768572/hype-cycle-emerging-technologies. Accessed 12 Feb 2018.
- Welpe, I. M., Tumasjan, A., & Theurer, C. (2015). Der Blick der Managementforschung. In T. Sattelberger et al. (Eds.), Das demokratische Unternehmen: Neue Arbeits- und Führungskulturen im Zeitalter digitaler Wirtschaft (pp. 89–103). Freiburg: Haufe.Google Scholar
- Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
- Wilensky, U., & Rand, W. (2015). Introduction to agent-based modeling: Modeling natural, social, and engineered complex systems with NetLogo. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Zutshi, A. (2015). DYNAMOD – a dynamic agent based modelling framework for digital businesses (PhD dissertation). Universidade Nova de Lisboa.Google Scholar
- Zutshi, A., Grilo, A., & Jardim-Gonçalves, R. (2013). DYNAMOD: A modelling framework for digital businesses based on agent based modeling. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management; IEEM, pp. 1372–1376.Google Scholar
- Zutshi, A., Grilo, A., & Jardim-Gonçalves, R. (2014). A dynamic agent-based modeling framework for digital business models: Applications to Facebook and a popular Portuguese online classifieds website. In P. J. Benghozi et al. (Eds.), Digital enterprise design & management, Advances in intelligent systems and computing (Vol. 261, pp. 105–117). Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar