Advertisement

Responses

  • John McDowell
Chapter
Part of the Studies in German Idealism book series (SIGI, volume 20)

Abstract

Tom Rockmore thinks my reading of Kant depends on my reaction to Henry Allison’s interpretation. That is an overstatement of how centrally Allison figures in what I have written about Kant. But it is true that I found an element in Allison’s account of transcendental idealism useful. I cited it to encapsulate something I anyway wanted to say about a conception I took Kant to be working towards, in a tendency I interpreted Hegel as bringing to completion.

References

  1. Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Ed. and Trans. P. Guyer and A.W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Pippin, Robert. 2008. Hegel’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations