Advertisement

McDowell and Hegel: An Introduction

  • Federico Sanguinetti
  • André J. Abath
Chapter
Part of the Studies in German Idealism book series (SIGI, volume 20)

Abstract

In this Introduction, we aim to give the reader a sense of how McDowell’s thought relates to Hegel’s. In Sect. 1.1, we consider recent intersections between Hegel’s thought and analytic philosophy by briefly reconstructing the growing influence of Hegel within analytic philosophy and by mentioning the main contributions which interpret Hegel’s work starting from an analytic conceptual and theoretical framework. In Sect. 1.2, we situate McDowell’s work within this landscape: we discuss several papers in which McDowell engages with Hegel’s thought, we single out core themes in McDowell’s work—perceptual experience, thought and action—, and we show how his treatment of these themes finds echo in Hegel’s thought; we also briefly consider McDowell’s influence on Hegel-studies. Finally, in Sect. 1.3, we present an outline of the contents of the book by summarizing the various chapters as well as the correspondent replies by McDowell.

References

  1. Allison, Henry E. 1983. Kant’s transcendental idealism: An interpretation and defense. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alznauer, Mark. 2015. Hegel’s Theory of Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin, Thomas. 1984. Moore’s Rejection of Idealism. In Philosophy in History, ed. Richard Rorty et al., 357–374. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernstein, Richard. 2002a. McDowell’s Domesticated Hegelianism. In ed. Smith (2002), 9–24.Google Scholar
  5. Bernstein, Jay. 2002b. Re-enchanting Nature. In ed. Smith (2002), 217–245.Google Scholar
  6. Berto, Francesco. 2007a. Hegel’s Dialectics as a Semantic Theory. European Journal of Philosophy 15: 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2007b. Kant, Hegel, Frege e la priorità del proposizionale. Il Pensiero 36: 67–83.Google Scholar
  8. Bordignon, Michela. 2012. Contradiction or not Contradiction. Hegel’s Dialectic between Brandom and Priest. Verifiche 41 (1/3): 221–245.Google Scholar
  9. Bowman, Brady. 2013. Hegel and the Metaphysics of Absolute Negativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brandom, Robert. 1979. Freedom as Costraint by Norm. American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (3): 187–196.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2000. Articulating Reasons. An Introduction to Inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2002. Tales of the Mighty Dead. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2004. Selbstbewusstsein und Selbst-Konstitution. In Hegels Erbe, ed. Ch. Halbig, M. Quante, and L. Siep, 46–77. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2005. Sketch of a Program for a Critical Reading of Hegel. Comparing Empirical and Logical Concepts. Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus 3: 131–161.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2008. Between Saying and Doing. Towards an Analytic Pragmatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 2011. Hegel e a filosofia analítica. Veritas 56 (1): 78–94.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2013. Some Post-Davidsonian Elements of Hegel’s Theory of Agency. In Sinnkritisches Philosophieren, ed. S. Rödl and H. Tegtmeyer, 63–82. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2014a. Some Hegelian Ideas of Note for Contemporary Analytic Philosophy. Hegel Bulletin 35 (1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ———. 2014b. A Hegelian Model of Legal Concept Determination: The Normative Fine Structure of the Judges’ Chain Novel. In Pragmatism, Law, and Language, ed. G. Hubbs and D. Lind, 19–39. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2015. Widererinnerter Idealismus. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  21. ———. Forthcoming. A Spirit of Trust. http://www.pitt.edu/~brandom/spirit_of_trust_2014.html.
  22. Bristow, Bill. 2005. Bildung and the Critique of Modern Skepticism in McDowell and Hegel. Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus 3: 179–207.Google Scholar
  23. Brooks, Tom. 2007. Hegel’s Political Philosophy. A Systematic Reading of the Philosophy of Right. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  24. ———., ed. 2012. Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Campana, Francesco. 2016. La filosofia hegeliana dell’arte come problema. Verifiche 45 (1/2): 13–71.Google Scholar
  26. Cirne-Lima, Carlos, and Antônio Soares. 2003. Being, Nothing, Becoming. Hegel and Us. Filosofia Unisinos 7 (1): 5–39.Google Scholar
  27. Corti, Luca. 2014. Ritratti hegeliani. Un capitolo della filosofia americana contemporanea. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 2016a. Pensare l’esperienza. Una lettura dell’ “Antropologia“ di Hegel. Bologna: Pendragon.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2016b. Conceptualism, Non-Conceptualism, and the Method of Hegel’s Psychology. In Hegel’s Philosophical Psychology, ed. S. Hermann-Sinai and L. Ziglioli, 228–250. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Danto, Arthur C. 1997. After the End of Art. Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. ———. 1998. The End of Art: A Philosophical Defense. History and Theory 37 (4): 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 2003. The Abuse of Beauty. Aesthetics and the Concept of Art. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 2004. Hegel’s End-of-Art Thesis. In A New History of German Literature, ed. D.E. Wellbery and J. Ryan, 535–540. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Davidson, Donald. 1983. A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge. In Kant oder Hegel, ed. D. Henrich, 423–438. Stuttgart: Klett–Cotta.Google Scholar
  35. DeVries, Willem. 1988. Hegel’s Theory of Mental Activity. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 2009. Getting Beyond Idealism. In Empiricism, Perceptual Knowledge, Normativity, and Realism. Essays on Wilfrid Sellars, ed. W. DeVries, 211–246. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. ———. 2011. Brandom and the Spirit of Hegel. In Robert Brandoms expressive Vernunft: Historische und systematische Untersuchungen, ed. Ch. Barth and H. Sturm, 159–176. Padeborn: Mentis.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 2017. Hegelian Spirits in Sellarsian Bottles. Philosophical Studies 174 (7): 1643–1654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dreyfus, Hubert L. 2006. Overcoming the Myth of the Mental. Topoi 25 (1/2): 43–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. ———. 2007. The Return of the Myth of the Mental. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (4): 352–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. ———. 2013. The Myth of the Pervasiveness of the Mental. In ed. Schear (2013), 15–40.Google Scholar
  42. Ferrarin, Alfredo. 2012. What must we recognize? Brandom’s Kant and Hegel. Verifiche 41 (1/3): 203–219.Google Scholar
  43. Ficara, Elena. 2013. Dialectic and Dialetheism. History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (1): 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. ———. 2015. Hegel’s Glutty Negation. History and Philosophy of Logic 36 (1): 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Forman, David. 2010. Second Nature and Spirit: Hegel on the Role of Habit in the Appearance of Perceptual Consciousness. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (4): 325–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gabriel, Markus. 2011. Transcendental Ontology. Essays in German Idealism. London/NewYork: Continuum.Google Scholar
  47. Gaiger, Jason. 2000. Art as Made and Sensuous: Hegel, Danto and the ‘End of Art’. Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 41 (42): 104–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gardner, Sebastian. 2007. The Limits of Naturalism and the Metaphysics of German Idealism. In German Idealism. Contemporary Perspectives, ed. E. Hammer, 19–49. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Gauthier, Yvon. 1984. Hegel’s Logic from a Logical Point of View. In Hegel and the Sciences, ed. R. Cohen and M. Wartofsky, 303–310. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gethmann-Siefert, Annemarie. 2013. Danto und Hegel zum Ende der Kunst—Ein Wettstreit um die Modernität der Kunst und Kunsttheorie. In Hegels Ästhetik als Theorie der Moderne, ed. A. Gethmann-Siefert et al., 17–37. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Giladi, Paul. 2014. Liberal Naturalism: The Curious Case of Hegel. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (2): 248–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. ———. 2016. Thought and Experience: Robust Conceptions of Phenomenology. Revista Eletrônica Estudos Hegelianos 13 (21): 39–54.Google Scholar
  53. Glock, Hans-Johann. 2008. What is Analytic Philosophy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Gubeljic, Mischa, Simone Link, Müller, Patrick, and Osburg Gunther. 2000. Nature and Second Nature in McDowell’s Mind and World. In ed. Willaschek (2000a), 41–49.Google Scholar
  55. Günther, Gotthard. 1964. Das Problem einer Formalisierung der Transzendentaldialektischen Logik. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Logik Hegels. Hegel-Studien. Beiheft 1: 65–123.Google Scholar
  56. Haddock, Adrian. 2008. McDowell and Idealism. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (1): 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. ———. 2009. McDowell, Transcendental Philosophy, and Naturalism. Philosophical Topics 37 (1): 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Halbig, Christoph. 2002. Objektives Denken Erkenntnistheorie und Philosophy of Mind in Hegels System. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
  59. ———. 2008. Varieties of Nature in Hegel and McDowell. In ed. Lindgaard (2008), 72–91.Google Scholar
  60. ———. 2009a. Objektive Gedanken. Zum Kernbegrff der Philosophie Hegels. Verifiche 37: 33–60.Google Scholar
  61. ———. 2009b. Das Recht des subjektiven Willens (§ 132). Überlegungen zu Hegels Theorie praktischer Rationalität. Hegel-Studien 44: 95–105.Google Scholar
  62. ———. 2014. McDowell aus der Sicht der klassischen deutschen Philosophie. In Die Philosophie John McDowells, ed. Ch. Barth and D. Lauer, 305–318. Münster: Mentis.Google Scholar
  63. ———. Forthcoming. Nihilismus, Konstruktivismus, Realismus?—Überlegungen zum Theorietyp von Hegels Metaethik.Google Scholar
  64. Hanna, Robert. 2001. Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  65. ———. 2011. Beyond the Myth of the Myth: A Kantian Theory of Non-Conceptual Content. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3): 323–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. ———. 2013. Kant, Hegel and the Fate of Non-Conceptual Content. Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 34 (1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ho, Tsung Hsing. 2014. Naturalism and the Space of Reasons in Mind and World. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (1): 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Hösle, Vittorio. 2006. Inferentialism in Brandom and Holism in Hegel: A Reply to Rorty and Some Questions for Brandom. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 27 (1): 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Houlgate, Stephen. 2006. Thought and Experience in Hegel and McDowell. European Journal of Philosophy 14 (2): 242–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. ———. 2009a. McDowell, Hegel and the Phenomenology of Spirit. The Owl of Minerva 41 (1/2): 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. ———. 2009b. Response to John McDowell. The Owl of Minerva 41 (1/2): 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. ———. 2009c. Phenomenology and De Re Interpretation: A Critique of Brandom’s Reading of Hegel. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (1): 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. ———. 2016. Hegel, McDowell and Perceptual Experience: A Response to John McDowell. In Hegel’s Philosophical Psychology, ed. S. Hermann-Sinai and L. Ziglioli, 57–73. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  74. Hylton, Peter. 1990. Russell, Idealism and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  75. ———. 1993. Hegel and Analytic Philosophy. In The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, ed. F. Beiser, 445–485. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ikäheimo, Heikki. 2017. Hegel’s Psychology. In The Oxford Handbook of Hegel, ed. D. Moyar, 424–452. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Illetterati, Luca. 2011. Pensiero e realtà. In Critica della ragione e forme dell’esperienza. Studi in onore di Massimo Barale, ed. L. Amoroso, A. Ferrarin, and C. La Rocca, 241–261. Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
  78. Jaeschke, Walter. 2004. Zum Begriff des Idealismus. In Hegels Erbe, ed. Ch. Halbig, M. Quante, and L. Siep, 164–183. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  79. Knappik, Franz. 2016. Hegel’s Essentialism. Natural Kinds and the Metaphysics of Explanation in Hegel’s Theory of ‘the Concept’. European Journal of Philosophy 24 (4): 760–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Kosok, Michael. 1966. The Formalization of Hegel’s Dialectical Logic. International Philosophical Quarterly 6 (4): 596–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kreines, James. 2015. Reason in the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Lachterman, David. 1987. Hegel and the Formalization of Logic. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 12 (1/2): 153–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Lorenzen, Paul. 1964. Das Problem einer Formalisierung der Hegelschen Logik. Hegel-Studien. Beiheft 1: 125–130.Google Scholar
  84. Maker, W. 2006. Hegel and Rorty, or, How Hegel Saves Pragmatism from Itself. The Owl of Minerva 37 (2): 99–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Marconi, Diego. 1989. La Formalizzazione Della Dialettica Hegel, Marx E la Logica Contemporanea. Torino: Rosemberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
  86. Newen, Albert and Sandkaulen, Birgit. 2015. Analytic Philosophy Meets Classical German Idealism, Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, vol. 18. Münster: Mentis.Google Scholar
  87. Nuzzo, Angelica. 2007. Life and Death in the History of Philosophy: Brandom’s Tales of the Mighty Dead. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (1): 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. ———., ed. 2010. Hegel and the Analytic Tradition. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  89. Ostritsch, Sebastian. 2014. Hegels Rechtsphilosophie als Metaethik. Münster: Mentis.Google Scholar
  90. Papazoglou, Alexis. 2012. Hegel and Naturalism. Hegel Bulletin 33 (2): 74–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. ———. 2015. The Transition from Nature to ‘Spirit’ in Hegel’s Lectures on the History of Philosophy. Revista Eletrônica Estudos Hegelianos 12 (19): 1–20.Google Scholar
  92. Pinkard, Terry. 2012. Hegelʼs Naturalism. Mind, Nature, and the Final Ends of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. ———. Forthcoming. McDowell’s Hegel: Quietism versus the Dialectic.Google Scholar
  94. Pippin, Robert. 1989. Hegel’s Idealism. The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. ———. 2000a. Hegel’s Practical Philosophy: The Realization of Freedom. In The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism, ed. Karl Ameriks, 180–199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. ———. 2000b. What is the Question for which Hegel’s Theory of Recognition is the Answer? European Journal of Philosophy 8 (2): 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. ———. 2002. Leaving Nature Behind: Or, Two Cheers for Subjectivism. In ed. Smith (2002), 58–78.Google Scholar
  98. ———. 2004. Hegels praktischer Realismus: rationales Handeln als Sittlichkeit. In Hegels Erbe, ed. Ch. Halbig, M. Quante, and L. Siep, 295–323. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  99. ———. 2005. Postscript: On McDowell’s Response to “Leaving Nature Behind.”. In The Persistence of Subjectivity: On the Kantian Aftermath, 206–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. ———. 2006a. Brandom’s Hegel. European Journal of Philosophy 13 (3): 381–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. ———. 2006b. Recognition and Reconciliation: Actualized Agency in Hegel’s Jena Phenomenology. In Hegel: New Directions, ed. Katerina Deligiorgi. Chesham: Acumen.Google Scholar
  102. ———. 2007. McDowell’s Germans: Response to ‘On Pippin’s Postscript’. European Journal of Philosophy 15 (3): 411–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. ———. 2013. After the Beautiful. Hegel and the Philosophy of Pictorial Modernism. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Priest, Graham. 1982. To Be or not to Be. Dialectical Tense Logic. Studia Logica 41 (2/3): 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. ———. 1985. Inconsistencies in Motion. American Philosophical Quarterly 22 (4): 339–346.Google Scholar
  106. Priest, Graham. 1989–1990. Dialectic and Dialetheic. Science and Society 53(4): 388–415.Google Scholar
  107. Priest, Graham. 1992. On Time. Philosophica 50: 9–18.Google Scholar
  108. ———. 1995. Beyond the Limits of Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  109. ———. 2006. In Contradiction. A Study of the Transconsistent. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Quante, Michael. 2002. Reconciling Mind and World: Some Initial Considerations for Opening a Dialogue between Hegel and McDowell. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 40: 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Quante, Michael. 2004a. Hegel’s concept of action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  112. ———. 2004b. Spekulative Philosophie als Therapie? In Hegels Erbe, ed. Ch. Halbig, M. Quante, and L. Siep, 324–350. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  113. ———. 2011. Die Wirklichkeit des Geistes. Studien zu Hegel. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  114. Redding, Paul. 2007. Analytic Philosophy and the Return of Hegelian Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. ———. 2011. The Analytic Neo-Hegelianism of John McDowell and Robert Brandom. In A Companion to Hegel, ed. S. Houlgate and M. Baur, 576–593. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. ———. 2012. McDowell’s Radicalization of Kant’s Account of Concepts and Intuitions: A Sellarsian (and Hegelian) Critique. Verifiche 41 (1/3): 9–37.Google Scholar
  117. ———. 2013. Hegel and Analytic Philosophy. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Hegel, ed. A. De Laurentiis and J. Edwards, 313–319. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  118. ———. 2017. Hegel and Sellars’ “Myth of Jones”: Can Sellars Have More in Common With Hegel than Rorty and Brandom Suggest? In Wilfrid Sellars, Idealism and Realism. Understanding Psychological Nominalism, ed. P.J. Reider, 41–58. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  119. Rockmore, Tom. 2001. Analytic Philosophy and the Hegelian Turn. The Review of Metaphysics 55 (2): 339–370.Google Scholar
  120. ———. 2002a. Hegel, Analytic Philosophy and Realism. Hegel-Studien 37: 123–138.Google Scholar
  121. ———. 2002b. Brandom, Hegel and Inferentialism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (4): 429–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. ———. 2003. Hegel e i limiti dell’hegelismo analitico. In Hegel contemporaneo, ed. L. Ruggiu and I. Testa, 341–360. Milano: Guerini e Associati.Google Scholar
  123. ———. 2005. Hegel, Idealism, and Analytic Philosophy. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. ———. 2011. Rorty, Hegel and Rorty’s Hegel. Pragmatism Today 2 (1): 14–22.Google Scholar
  125. Rödl, Sebastian. 2007. Eliminating Externality. Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus 5: 176–188.Google Scholar
  126. Rorty, Richard. 1972. The World Well Lost. The Journal of Philosophy 69 (19): 649–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. ———. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  128. ———. 1981. Nineteenth-Century Idealism and Twentieth-Century Textualism. Monist 64 (2): 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. ———. 1982. Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  130. ———. 1989. Irony, Contingency, Solidarity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. ———. 1998. Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. ———. 2002. A Pragmatist View of Contemporary Analytic Philosophy. Utopia y Práxis Latinoamericana 7 (16): 29–40.Google Scholar
  133. Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1985. Rorty’s Interpretation of Hegel. The Review of Metaphysics 39 (2): 321–333.Google Scholar
  134. Russell, Bertrand. 1959. My Philosophical Development. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  135. Sanguinetti, Federico. 2015a. Is Hegel’s Theory of Sensation Committed to Metaphysics? A Comparison between Hegel and McDowell on Perceptual Knowledge. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 18: 179–198.Google Scholar
  136. ———. 2015b. La teoria hegeliana della sensazione. Trento: Verifiche.Google Scholar
  137. Sedgwick, Sally. 1997. McDowell’s Hegelianism. European Journal of Philosophy 5 (1): 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. ———. 2000. Hegel, McDowell, and Recent Defenses of Kant. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 31 (3): 229–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Sellars, Wilfrid. 1997. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  140. Siep, Ludwig, Christoph Halbig, and Michael M. Quante. 2001. Direkter Realismus. In Idealismus als Theorie der Räpresentation? ed. R. Schumacher and O. Scholz, 147–163. Paderborn: Mentis.Google Scholar
  141. Sluga, Hans. 1980. Gottlob Frege. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  142. Stern, Robert. 1999. Going Beyond the Kantian Philosophy: On McDowell’s Hegelian Critique of Kant. European Journal of Philosophy 7 (2): 247–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. ———. 2007. Freedom, Self-Legislation and Morality in Kant and Hegel: Constructivist vs. Realist Accounts. In German Idealism. Contemporary Perspectives, ed. E. Hammer, 245–266. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  144. ———. 2009. Hegelian Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Stone, Alison. 2005. Petrified Intelligence. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  146. Testa, Italo. 2003. Idealismo e normatività. Robert Brandom e la ricezione americana di Hegel. In Hegel contemporaneo, ed. L. Ruggiu and I. Testa, 318–337. Milano: Guerini e Associati.Google Scholar
  147. ———. 2009. Second Nature and Recognition: Hegel and the Social Space. Critical Horizons 10 (3): 341–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. ———. 2010. La natura del riconoscimento. In Riconoscimento naturale e ontologia sociale in Hegel (1801–1806). Milano-Udine: Mimesis.Google Scholar
  149. ———. 2012. How does Recognition Emerge from Nature? The Genesis of Consciousness in Hegel’s Jena Writings. Critical Horizons: A Journal of Philosophy & Social Theory 13: 176–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. ———. 2013. Hegel’s Naturalism, or Soul and Body in the Encyclopedia. In Essays on Hegel’s Philosophy of Subjective Spirit, ed. D. Stern, 19–35. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  151. Thagard, Paul. 1982. Hegel, Science, and Set Theory. Erkenntnis 18 (3): 397–410.Google Scholar
  152. Tinland, Olivier. 2012. The Serpent versus the Turtle. Post-Sellarsian Portrait of Hegel as the “Great Foe of Immediacy.”. Les Études Philosophiques 103 (4): 533–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Wartenberg, Thomas. 1993. Hegel’s Idealism: the Logic of the Conceptuality. In The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, ed. F. Beiser, 102–129. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Welsch, Wolfgang. 2003. Hegel und die analytische Philosophie. Über einige Kongruenzen in Grundfragen der Philosophie. Kritisches Jahrbuch der Philosophie 8: 11–73.Google Scholar
  155. Westphal, Kenneth. 1989. Hegel’s Epistemological Realism. A Study of the Aim and Method of Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Westphal, Kenneth. 2003. Hegel’s Epistemology: a Philosophical Introduction to the Phenomenology of Spirit. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
  157. ———. 2006. Hegel and Realism. In A Companion to Pragmatism, ed. J. Shook and J. Margolis, 177–183. London: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Westphal, Kenneth. 2007–2008. Intelligenz and the Interpretation of Hegel’s Idealism: Some Hermeneutic Pointers. The Owl of Minerva 39 (1/2): 95–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Westphal, Kenneth. 2008a. Contemporary Epistemology: Kant, Hegel, McDowell. In ed. Lindgaard, 124–151.Google Scholar
  160. ———. 2008b. Philosophizing about Nature: Hegel’s Philosophical Project. In The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy, ed. F. Beiser, 281–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. ———. 2010. Hegel, Russell, and the Foundations of Philosophy. In ed. Nuzzo, 173–193.Google Scholar
  162. Willaschek, Marcus, ed. 2000a. John McDowell: Reason and Nature. Lecture and Colloquium in Münster 1999. Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  163. ———. 2000b. On “The Unboundedness of the Conceptual.” In ed. Willaschek (2000a), 35–40.Google Scholar
  164. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 20094. Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker, and J. Schulte. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Federico Sanguinetti
    • 1
  • André J. Abath
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyThe Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)NatalBrazil
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyThe Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG)Belo HorizonteBrazil

Personalised recommendations