Advertisement

A Study on Effects of Supporting Born Global Startups Policy Affecting the Business

  • Jung-Ran An
  • Sung Taek Lee
  • Ju-Hyung Kim
  • Gwang-Yong Gim
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 789)

Abstract

Since the economic growth rate has been led by large corporations, there has been a great deal of interest in the development of the economy. The rise of global startups with their focus on global markets and customers and who develop products/services that are globally focused are a catalyst for a new economic revival. This research has also been focused on corporate finance and nonfinancial performance. As a result of the analysis, it was found that space and accelerating support with loan funding policy affects entrepreneurial orientation. It was also found that the space, entrepreneurial education, and consulting, and accelerating support affects global orientation. Additionally, both entrepreneurial orientation and global orientation have a profound impact on financial performance and non-financial performance of global startups. This study not only provides meaningful information on the implementation of policy research and the implementation of startup policy, but it also provides a framework for the study.

Keywords

Global startup Startup policy Entrepreneurial orientation Market orientation Network capabilities 

References

  1. 1.
    Oviatt, B.M., McDougall, P.P.: Toward a theory of international new ventures. J. Int. Bus. Stud (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oviatt, B.M., Shrader, R.C., McDougall, P.P.: The internationalization of new ventures: a risk management model. Adv. Int. Management. 16 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Han, U.-S., Lee, B.-K.: A study on the efficient management strategies for business incubator center in Korea. J. Bus. Educ. 6 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cho, J.-H., Park, K.-Il.: A study on the effects of operating characteristics of business incubator on the firm’s performance, Korean Acad. Soc. Acc. 13(3) (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Na, S.-G.: A study on the structural relationship among entrepreneurial characteristics, success factors and performances of small business start-up founders. Management Info. Syst. Rev. 35(4) (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee, Y., Hong, K., Jeong, Y., Park, S.: Developing entrepreneurship education strategy for venture's successful startup. Korea Soc. Learning Performance. 18(1) (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim, Y.J.: A study on building program development model of entrepreneurship education for adults. J. Vocational Educ. Training. 6(1) (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mun, W.: Study on direction of development of business consulting for small and medium enterprises (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim, C.-K.: A study on the operating performance factor of the BI's tenant. Korean Assoc. Bus. Adm. 2011(1) (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sung H.J., Hae, R.K.: An exploratory study on success factors in small business startups. J. Small Bus. Innovation. 4(2) (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Han, J.H.: A Study on Activating Factors of Venture Entrepreneur in Korea (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lumpkin, G.T., Dess, G.G.: Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy Management Rev (1996)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Naman, J.L., Slevin, D.P.: Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit. Strateg. Management J. 14, 137–153 (1993)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Coviello, N., Munro, H.J.: Growing the entrepreneurial firm. Euro. J. Marketing. 27(7), 49–61 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cavusgil, S.T., Zou, S.: Marketing strategy: performance relationship: an investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures. J. Marketing. 58, 1–21 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Knight, G.A.: Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation. J. Bus. Venturing. 12, 213–225 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eppink, D.J., Van Rhijn, B.M.: The internationalization of Dutch insurance companies. Long Range Plann. 21(5), 54–60 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramaswamy, R., Rowthorn, R.: Deindustrialization: causes and implications (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Knight, G., Koed Madsen, T., Servais, P.: An inquiry into born-global firms in Europe and the USA. Int. Marketing Rev. 21(6), 645–665 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kuivalainen, Q.,Sundqvist, S., Servais, P.: Firms’ degree of born-globalness, international entrepreneurial orientation and export performance. J. World Bus. (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ari, J., Niina, N., Kaisu, P., Sami, S.: Strategic orientations of born globals: do they really matter? J. World Bus. 43(2), 158–170 (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim, G.: (Amos 18.0) Structure Equation Model Analysis (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee, H.: Data Analysis Using SPSS (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim, G.S.: A Study on the service quality strategy of university education. Korean Soc. Q. Management. 2010(1) (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural evaluation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(1), 39–50 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jung-Ran An
    • 1
  • Sung Taek Lee
    • 2
  • Ju-Hyung Kim
    • 2
  • Gwang-Yong Gim
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationSoongsil UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of IT Policy and ManagementSoongsil University, Soongsil UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations