Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Ian W. KingEmail author
  • Annick Schramme
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Business, Arts and Humanities book series (PSBAH)

Abstract

In this final chapter, we attempt to provide an assessment of the distinct contributions from our nine locations (Ethiopia, Taiwan, China, India, Australia, South Africa, Brazil, Serbia and the USA). We note that the understanding of cultural governance is both similar and, at the same time, dissimilar across these locations; similar in the sense that all agree that cultural governance is a valuable concept, but dissimilar in their application of it (or aspiration to implement it) in their respective contexts. Nevertheless, we argue that there is a pattern of development and we offer this as the beginning of a conceptual model. We conclude the chapter with a few suggestions for future research in this area.

References

  1. Barber, B. (2013). If Mayors Ruled the World. Dysfunctional Nations, Rising Cities. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Belfiore, E., & Bennett, O. (2007). Rethinking the Social Impacts of the Arts. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13(2), 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class. Boulder: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Kenis, P., & Provan, K. G. (2011). Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 229–252.Google Scholar
  5. Maastricht Treaty. (1992). Treaty of European Union, Signed 7th February, 1992.Google Scholar
  6. Madden, M. (2009, July). The Independence of Government Arts Funding: A Review. www.ifacca.org
  7. McGovern, G. J., Court, D., Quelch, J., & Crawford, B. (2004, November). Bringing Customers into the Boardroom. Harvard Business Review, 70–81.Google Scholar
  8. Patti, D., & Polyak, L. (2017). Funding the Cooperative City: Community Finance and the Economy of Civic Spaces. Vienna: Cooperative City Books.Google Scholar
  9. Schramme, A., Schrauwen, J., & Rommes, C. (2013). ‘Corporate Governance’ for the Cultural Sector. Leuven: Lannoocampus.Google Scholar
  10. Schwartz, S. J., Unger, J. B., Zamboanga, B. L., & Szapocznik, J. (2010). Rethinking the Concept of Acculturation: Implications for Theory and Research. American Psychologist, 65(4), 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Throsby, D. (2010). The Economics of Cultural Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. isbn:978-0-521-68784-3.Google Scholar
  12. Van Besouw, S. M., & Noordman, T. B. J. (2005). Non-Profit Governance. Delft: Eburon publisher.Google Scholar
  13. Wills, J. R., Coskun Samli, A., & Jacobs, L. (1991). Developing Global Products and Marketing Strategies: A Construct and a Research Agenda. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 19(January), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of the ArtsLondonUK
  2. 2.University of Antwerp/Antwerp Management SchoolAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations