Advertisement

Cave Ecology pp 479-494 | Cite as

Conservation and Impact Assessment of Subterranean Fauna in Australia

  • Stuart Halse
Chapter
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 235)

Abstract

The focus on conservation of subterranean fauna has been greater in Western Australia than other parts of Australia because the subterranean fauna is richer. All fauna is protected at the species level in Western Australia and actions that may reasonably be expected to result in loss of a subterranean (or any surface) species cannot lawfully be approved. However, the practical challenges to protecting subterranean species that occur in the broad landscape, rather than in well-defined caves, include assessing whether a species is threatened when there is very little information about subterranean species distributions and the difficulty of stopping economically important projects for hidden species that appear to have little value. Documenting subterranean fauna communities in development areas usually requires large sampling effort and determining the ranges of rarer species is always difficult, especially for troglofauna. Using geological information to predict species ranges is also challenging because below-ground mapping of the geological characteristics likely to control subterranean fauna occurrence requires extensive drilling and is therefore expensive. The process of identifying which subterranean species are present can also be challenging because the taxonomic framework for the Australian fauna is poorly developed; there are rather different selective pressures on the morphology of subterranean species compared with their surface relatives and dispersal capacity is poor, which complicates the use of genetics to identify species. While the main threats to subterranean fauna include mining, water supply and agriculture, the lack of strong public support for their conservation is also a threat that needs to be addressed.

References

  1. Asmyhr MG, Hose G, Graham P et al (2014) Fine-scale genetics of subterranean syncarids. Freshw Biol 59:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradford TM, Adams M, Guzik MT et al (2013) Patterns of population genetic variation in sympatric chiltoniid amphipods within a calcrete aquifer reveal a dynamic subterranean environment. Heredity 111:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryan BB (2002) Reserve selection for nature conservation in South Australia: past, present and future. Aust Geogr Stud 40:196–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carstens BC, Pelletier TA, Reid NM et al (2013) How to fail at species delimitation. Mol Ecol 22:4369–4383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Danielopol DL, Griebler C, Gunatilaka A et al (2003) Present state and future prospects for groundwater ecosystems. Environ Conserv 30:104–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Queiroz K (1998) The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation: a conceptual unification and terminological recommendations. In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SH (eds) Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 55–75Google Scholar
  7. Di Lorenzo T, Galassi DMP (2013) Agricultural impact on Mediterranean alluvial aquifers: do groundwater communities respond? Fund Appl Limnol 182:271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Di Lorenzo T, Di Marzio WD, Sáenz ME et al (2014) Sensitivity of hypogean and epigean freshwater copepods to agricultural pollutants. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:4643–4655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DSITI (2015) Guideline for the environmental assessment of subterranean aquatic fauna. Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, Brisbane. https://publications.qld.gov.au/dataset/f7e68ccd-8c13-422f-bd46-1b391500423f/resource/ba880910-5117-433a-b90d-2c131874a8e6/download/guideline-subterranean-aquatic-fauna.pdf
  10. Eberhard SM, Halse SA, Williams MR et al (2009) Exploring the relationship between sampling efficiency and short range endemism for groundwater fauna in the Pilbara region, Western Australia. Freshw Biol 54:885–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eme D, Zagmajster M, Delić T et al (2017) Do cryptic species matter in macroecology? Sequencing European groundwater crustaceans yields smaller ranges but does not challenge biodiversity determinants. Ecography 40:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. EPA (1996) Report and recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority: Exmouth boat harbour (formerly Coral Coast Marina, residential subdivision and quarry, Exmouth) – Change to environmental conditions, Bull 806. Environmental Protection Authority, PerthGoogle Scholar
  13. EPA (1998) Report and recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority: Newman Satellite Development, mining Orebody 23 below the watertable, Bull 888. Environmental Protection Authority, PerthGoogle Scholar
  14. EPA (2002) Report and recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority: iron ore mine, downstream processing (direct-reduced and hot-briquetted Iron) and port, Cape Preston, WA, Bull 1056. Environmental Protection Authority, PerthGoogle Scholar
  15. EPA (2006) Report and recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority: Gorgon Gas Development, Barrow Island Nature Reserve, Bull 1221. Environmental Protection Authority, PerthGoogle Scholar
  16. EPA (2007) Report and recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority: Mesa A/Warramboo iron ore project, Bull 1251. Environmental Protection Authority, PerthGoogle Scholar
  17. EPA (2014) Report and recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority: Cloudbreak Life of Mine Project—inquiry under s46 of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 to amend Ministerial Statement 899, Rep 1498. Environmental Protection Authority, PerthGoogle Scholar
  18. EPA (2015) Application of a significance framework in the environmental impact assessment process. Environmental Assessment Guideline 9. Environmental Protection Authority, PerthGoogle Scholar
  19. EPA (2016a) Report and recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority: Yeelirrie uranium project, Rep 1574. Environmental Protection Authority, PerthGoogle Scholar
  20. EPA (2016b) Report and recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority: Christmas Creek Iron Ore Mine expansion, Rep 1567. Environmental Protection Authority, PerthGoogle Scholar
  21. EPA (2016c) Report and recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority: Gruyere Gold Project, Rep 1587. Environmental Protection Authority, PerthGoogle Scholar
  22. EPA (2016d) Environmental factor guideline: subterranean fauna. Environmental Protection Authority, Perth. http://www.epa.wa.gov.au/sites/default/files/Policies_and_Guidance/Guideline-Subterranean-Fauna-131216_3.pdf
  23. Goonan P, Jenkins C, Hill R et al (2015) Subsurface groundwater ecosystems: a briefing report on the current knowledge, monitoring considerations and future plans for South Australia. Environment Protection Authority, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  24. Government of Western Australia (2017) Wildlife conservation (specially protected fauna) notice 2016. In: Government gazette, WA, 6 Jan 2017. Western Australian Government, Perth, pp 76–89Google Scholar
  25. Griebler C, Avramov (2015) Groundwater ecosystem services: a review. Freshw Sci 34:355–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guzik MT, Cooper SJB, Humphreys WF et al (2011) Evidence for population fragmentation within a subterranean aquatic habitat in the Western Australian desert. Heredity 107:215–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hall L (1990) Bat conservation in Australia. Aust Zool 26:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Halse SA, Pearson GB (2014) Troglofauna in the vadose zone: comparison of scraping and trapping results and sampling adequacy. Subterr Biol 13:17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Halse SA, Scanlon MD, Cocking JS et al (2014) Pilbara stygofauna: deep groundwater of an arid landscape contains globally significant radiation of biodiversity. Rec W Aust Mus Suppl 78:443–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hancock PJ, Boulton AJ, Humphreys WF (2005) Aquifers and hyporheic zones: towards an ecological understanding of groundwater. Hydrgeol J 13:98–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harvey MS, Rix MG, Framenau VW et al (2011) Protecting the innocent: studying short-range endemic taxa enhances conservation outcomes. Invertebr Syst 25:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Henle K, Alard D, Clitherow J et al (2008) Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe – a review. Agric Ecosyst Environ 124:60–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hose GC (2005) Assessing the need for groundwater quality guidelines for pesticides using the species sensitivity distribution approach. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 11:951–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hose GC, Symington K, Lott MJ et al (2016) The toxicity of arsenic(III), chromium(VI) and zinc to groundwater copepods. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:18704–18713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hose GC, Fryirs KA, Bailey J et al (2017) Different depths, different fauna: habitat influences on the distribution of groundwater invertebrates. Hydrobiologia 797:145–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Humphreys WF (1993) The significance of the subterranean fauna in biogeographical reconstruction: examples from Cape Range peninsula, Western Australia. Rec W Aust Mus Suppl 45:165–192Google Scholar
  37. Humphreys WF (1999) Relict stygofaunas living in sea salt, karst and calcrete habitats in arid northwestern Australia contain many ancient lineages. In: Ponder W, Lunney D (eds) The other 99%: the conservation and biodiversity on invertebrates. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Sydney, pp 219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Humphreys WF (2007) Comment on assessing the need for groundwater quality guidelines for pesticides using the species sensitivity distribution approach. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 13:236–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Humphreys WF (2009) Hydrogeology and groundwater ecology: does each inform the other? Hydrgeol J 17:5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Javidkar M, Cooper SJB, King RA et al (2016) Molecular systematics and biodiversity of oniscidean isopods in the groundwater calcretes of central Western Australia. Mol Phylogenet Evol 104:83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jerde CL, Mahon AR, Chadderton WL et al (2011) “Sight-unseen” detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA. Conserv Lett 4:150–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Karanovic T, Cooper SJ (2011) Molecular and morphological evidence for short range endemism in the Kinnecaris solitaria complex (Copepoda: Parastenocarididae), with descriptions of seven new species. Zootaxa 3026:1–64Google Scholar
  43. Karanovic T, Cooper SJB (2012) Explosive radiation of the genus Schizopera on a small subterranean island in Western Australia (Copepoda : Harpacticoida): unravelling the cases of cryptic speciation, size differentiation and multiple invasions. Invertebr Syst 26:115–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Karanovic T, Eberhard SM, Perina G et al (2013) Two new subterranean ameirids (Crustacea : Copepoda : Harpacticoida) expose weaknesses in the conservation of short-range endemics threatened by mining developments in Western Australia. Invertebr Syst 27:540–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Karanovic T, Djurakic M, Eberhard SM (2015) Cryptic species or inadequate taxonomy? Implementation of 2D geometric morphometrics based on integumental organs as landmarks for delimitation and description of copepod taxa. Syst Biol 65:304–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Korbel KL, Hose GC (2011) A tiered framework for assessing groundwater ecosystem health. Hydrobiologia 661:329–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Korbel KL, Hancock PJ, Serov P et al (2013) Groundwater ecosystems vary with land use across a mixed agricultural landscape. J Environ Qual 42:380–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Korbel K, Chariton A, Stephenson S et al (2017) Wells provide a distorted view of life in the aquifer: implications for sampling, monitoring and assessment of groundwater ecosystems. Sci Rep 7:40702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Larned ST (2012) Phreatic groundwater ecosystems: research frontiers for freshwater ecology. Freshw Biol 57:885–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Majer J (2009) Saga of the short-range endemic. Aust J Entomol 48:265–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marmonier P, Maazouzi C, Foulquier et al (2013) The use of crustaceans as sentinel organisms to evaluate groundwater ecological quality. Ecol Eng 57:118–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mudd GM (2010) The environmental sustainability of mining in Australia: key mega-trends and looming constraints. Resour Policy 35:98–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nevill J, Hancock PJ, Murray BR et al (2010) Groundwater-dependent ecosystems and the dangers of groundwater overdraft: a review and an Australian perspective. Pac Conserv Biol 16:187–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pellegrini TG, Ferreira RI (2012) Management in a neotropical show cave: planning for invertebrate conservation. Int J Speleol 41:359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pesce GL, de Laurentiis P (1996) Copepods from groundwaters of Western Australia. III. Diacyclops humphreysi n. sp. and comments on the Diacyclops crassicaudis-complex (Copepoda: Cyclopidae). Crustaceana 69:524–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Russell MJ, MacLean VL (2008) Management issues in a Tasmanian tourist cave: potential microclimatic impacts of cave modifications. J Environ Manage 87:474–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Scarsbrook MR, Fenwick GD (2003) Preliminary assessment of crustacean distribution patterns in New Zealand groundwater aquifers. NZ J Mar Freshw 37:405–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Scott JM, Davis FW, McGhie RG et al (2001) Nature reserves: do they capture the full ranges of America’s biodiversity? Ecol Appl 11:999–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sheppard G, Gallardo A, Hall J et al (2009) Managing the cumulative groundwater impact s of multiple iron ore projects at Cape Preston (or … one plus one plus one plus one does not equal four). In: Water in Mining Conference, 15–17 Sept 2009, Perth, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, pp 169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Souza Silva M, Ferreira RL (2015) Cave invertebrates in Espírito Santo state, Brazil: a primary analysis of endemism, threats and conservation priorities. Subterr Biol 16:79–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Steube C, Richter S, Griebler C (2009) First attempts towards an integrative concept for the ecological assessment of groundwater ecosystems. Hydrogeol J 17:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tomlinson M, Boulton AJ, Hancock PJ et al (2007) Deliberate omission or unfortunate oversight: should stygofaunal surveys be included in routine groundwater monitoring programs? Hydrgeol J 15:1317–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bennelongia Environmental ConsultantsJolimontAustralia

Personalised recommendations