Advertisement

Informational Lobbying in the EU: Mechanisms of Probity, Dissembling, and Transparency

  • Adam William Chalmers
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter examines questions of dissembling and probity in informational lobbying in the EU. Scholars have long acknowledged that information is at the very heart of EU lobbying. Information is used as a form of lobbying currency that not only grants interest groups access to decision-making processes but also the opportunity to shape policy outcomes in their favor. But to what extent do interest groups provide inaccurate, incomplete, and even erroneous information? What incentives do they have to be honest, and what safeguards can policymakers implement to ensure the receipt of accurate information? This chapter explores these questions from both an interest group and policymaker perspective.

References

  1. Austen-Smith, D. (1993). Information and influence: Lobbying for agendas and votes. American Journal of Political Science, 34(3), 799–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baroni, L. (2014). Information counts: Interest group success in the European Parliament. Doctoral thesis. University of Salzburg.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, XCVIII(3), 371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berry, J. M. (1977). Lobbying for the people: The political behavior of public interest groups. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beyers, J. (2002). Gaining and seeking access: The European adaptation of domestic interest associations. European Journal of Political Research, 41, 585–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beyers, J. (2004). Voice and access. Political practices of European interest associations. European Union Politics, 5(2), 211–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouwen, P. (2002). Corporate lobbying in the European Union: The logic of access. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(3), 365–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouwen, P. (2004a). The logic of access to the European Parliament: Business lobbying in the committee on economic and monetary affairs. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(3), 473–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bouwen, P. (2004b). Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union Institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 43, 337–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Broscheid, A., & Coen, D. (2003). Insider and outsider lobbying of the European Commission. An informational model of forum politics. European Union Politics, 4(2), 165–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Broscheid, A., & Coen, D. (2007). Lobbying activity and fora creation in the EU: Empirically exploring the nature of the policy good. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(3), 346–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burson Marsteller. (2009). A guide to effective lobbying in Europe 2009. Accessed June 18, 2017, from http://www.oursocialmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/effective-lobbying_light_07102009.pdf
  13. Chaffin, J. (23 January 2009). Gazprom lobbyist suspended from EU. The Financial Times. Accessed June 18, 2017, from http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/06c4fd02-e8b3-11dd-a4d0-0000779fd2ac.html#axzz1AApu8GHe
  14. Corporate Europe Observatory. (2008). How hired-gun lobbyists pulled the teeth out of the new EU lobbyists’ register. Accessed June 18, 2017, from http://archive.corporateeurope.org/howlobbyistspulledteeth.html
  15. Chalmers, A. W. (2011). Interests, information and influence: Comparing the influence of interests groups in the European Union. Journal of European Integration, 33(4), 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chalmers, A. W. (2013a). Trading information for access: Informational lobbying strategies and interest group access to the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(1), 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chalmers, A. W. (2013b). With a lot of help from their Friends: Explaining the social logic of informational lobbying in the European Union. European Union Politics, 14(4), 475–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crombez, C. (2002). Information, lobbying and the legislative process in the European Union. European Union Politics, 3(1), 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Bruycker, I. (2016). Pressure and expertise: Explaining the information supply of interest groups in EU legislative lobbying. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(3), 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eising, R. (2007a). Institutional context, organizational resources and strategic choices. European Union Politics, 8(3), 329–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eising, R. (2007b). The access of business interests in to EU institutions: Toward élite pluralism. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(3), 384–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. EurActiv. (31 October 2008). Civil society demands more lobbying transparency. EurActiv online. Accessed June 18, 2017, from http://www.euractiv.com/en/pa/civil-society-demands-lobbying-transparency/article-176819
  23. EurActiv. (26 January 2009a). Brussels firm excluded from EU lobbyists’ register. EurActiv online. Accessed June 18, 2017, from http://www.euractiv.com/en/pa/brussels-firm-excluded-eu-lobbyists-register/article-178809
  24. EurActiv. (23 July 2009b). Chemicals group suspended from EU lobby register. EurActiv online. Accessed June 18, 2017, from https://www.euractiv.com/section/public-affairs/news/chemicals-group-suspended-from-eu-lobby-register/
  25. European Commission. (2006). Green Paper. European transparency initiative. COM (2006) 194 final.Google Scholar
  26. European Commission. (2008). Communication from the commission. European transparency initiative. A framework for relations with interest representatives (Register and Code of Conduct). COM (2008) 323 final.Google Scholar
  27. European Commission. (2009). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. European transparency initiative: The register of interest representatives, one year after. COM (2009) 612 final.Google Scholar
  28. European Commission. (2010). Code of conduct for interest representatives: Rules for professional ethics for members and staff of the European Commission.Google Scholar
  29. European Parliament. (2009). Rules of procedure of the European Parliament. 7th Parliamentary Term – December 2009.Google Scholar
  30. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (2001). Special interest politics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hayes-Renshaw, F. (2006). The Council of Ministers. In J. Peterson & M. Shackelton (Eds.), The Institutions of the European Union (2nd ed., pp. 60–80). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. King, T. (03 September 2009). Testing the Commission’s register. EuropeanVoice. Accessed June 18, 2017, from http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/imported/testing-the-commission-s-register/65796.aspx
  33. Klüver, H. (2012). Informational lobbying in the European Union: The effects of organisational characteristics. West European Politics, 35(3), 491–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Klüver, H. (2013). Lobbying in the European Union: Interest groups, lobbying coalitions, and policy change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lehmann, W. (2009). The European Parliament. In D. Coen & J. Richardson (Eds.), Lobbying the European Union: Institutions, actors, and issues (pp. 39–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Lowi, T. J. (1969). The end of liberalism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  37. Mahoney, C. (2008). Brussels versus the Beltway. Advocacy in the United States and the European Union. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Maloney, W. (2009). Interest groups and the revitalisation of democracy: Are we expecting too much? Representations, 45(3), 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marshall, D. (2010). Who to lobby and when: Institutional determinants of interest group strategies in European Parliament committees. European Union Politics, 11(4), 553–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McLaughlin, A., & Greenwood, J. (1995). The management of interest representation in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 33(1), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Milbrath, L. W. (1963). The Washington lobbyists. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  42. OECD. (2009). Self-Regulation and Regulation of the Lobbying Profession, (GOV/PGC/GF(2009)5). Accessed June 18, 2017, from http://www.oecd.org/document/62/0,3746,en_2649_34135_41878910_1_1_1_1,00.html
  43. Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Potters, J., & van Winden, F. (1990). Modelling political pressure as transmission of information. European Journal of Political Economy, 6, 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Potters, J., & van Winden, F. (1992). Lobbying and asymmetric information. Public Choice, 74, 269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sanchez Salgado, R. (2014). Rebalancing EU interest representation? Associative democracy and EU fund of civil society organizations. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(2), 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Saurugger, S. (2008). Interest groups and democracy in the EU. A critical reappraisal. West European Politics, 31(6), 1272–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The Semi-Sovereign people. A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  49. van Schaik, F. (2010). Beyond Satire – the Worst EU lobbying awards 2005–2008. In Alter-EU Steering Committee (Eds.), Bursting the Brussels bubble. The battle to expose corporate lobbying in the heart of the EU (pp. 134–138). Brussels: Alter-EU.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of European and International StudiesKing’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations