Advertisement

Antiseptic Stewardship for Skin Antiseptics

  • Günter Kampf
Chapter

Abstract

Alcohol-based skin antiseptics are based on ethanol, propan-2-ol or propan-1-ol. Some products contain additional non-volatile biocidal agents such as chlorhexidine digluconate, benzalkonium chloride, hydrogen peroxide, povidone iodine or octenidine dihydrochloride. Currently, only chlorhexidine digluconate has a proven health benefit (prevention of catheter-associated bloodstream infections and probably also surgical site infections). Octenidine dihydrochloride may also have a health benefit but the evidence is sparse. There is no health benefit for additional benzalkonium chloride, hydrogen peroxide or povidone iodine. Chlorhexidine digluconate and benzalkonium chloride cause a strong and stable MIC increase in numerous mainly Gram-negative species. Cross-tolerance is frequently found between benzalkonium chloride and chlorhexidine digluconate and to various antibiotics. Horizontal gene transfer can be induced by chlorhexidine digluconate in E. coli. Antibiotic resistance gene expression can be increased by chlorhexidine digluconate in a vanA E. faecium. And efflux pump genes can be up-regulated in some species by benzalkonium chloride and chlorhexidine digluconate. The overall balance seems to justify the use of chlorhexidine digluconate in alcohol despite a number of risks. It may also be favourable for octenidine dihydrochloride in alcohol (sparse evidence for a health benefit). Alcohol-based skin antiseptics with benzalkonium chloride should be replaced considering the magnitude of risks and the lack of a health benefit.

References

  1. 1.
    Allegranzi B, Bischoff P, de Jonge S, Kubilay NZ, Zayed B, Gomes SM, Abbas M, Atema JJ, Gans S, van Rijen M, Boermeester MA, Egger M, Kluytmans J, Pittet D, Solomkin JS (2016) New WHO recommendations on preoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective. Lancet Infect Dis 16(12):e276–e287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(16)30398-xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allegranzi B, Egger M, Pittet D, Bischoff P, Nthumba P, Solomkin J (2017) WHO’s recommendation for surgical skin antisepsis is premature - Authors’ reply. Lancet Infect Dis 17(10):1024–1025.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30526-1CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berrios-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, Reinke CE, Morgan S, Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Dellinger EP, Itani KMF, Berbari EF, Segreti J, Parvizi J, Blanchard J, Allen G, Kluytmans J, Donlan R, Schecter WP (2017) Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection. JAMA Surg 152(8):784–791.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904
  4. 4.
    Chaiyakunapruk N, Veenstra DL, Lipsky BA, Saint S (2002) Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 136(11):792–801CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Darouiche RO, Wall MJ, Itani KM, Otterson MF, Webb AL, Carrick MM, Miller HJ, Awad SS, Crosby CT, Mosier MC, Alsharif A, Berger DH (2010) Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisepsis. N Engl J Med 362(1):18–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Debreceni G, Meggyesi R, Mestyan G (2007) Efficacy of spray disinfection with a 2-propanol and benzalkonium chloride containing solution before epidural catheter insertion–a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Br J Anaesth 98(1):131–135.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/ael288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dettenkofer M, Jonas D, Wiechmann C, Rossner R, Frank U, Zentner J, Daschner FD (2002) Effect of skin disinfection with octenidine dihydrochloride on insertion site colonization of intravascular catheters. Infection 30(5):282–285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dettenkofer M, Wilson C, Gratwohl A, Schmoor C, Bertz H, Frei R, Heim D, Luft D, Schulz S, Widmer AF (2010) Skin disinfection with octenidine dihydrochloride for central venous catheter site care: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Clin Microbiol Infect 16(6):600–606.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02917.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoiby N, Bjarnsholt T, Moser C, Bassi GL, Coenye T, Donelli G, Hall-Stoodley L, Hola V, Imbert C, Kirketerp-Moller K, Lebeaux D, Oliver A, Ullmann AJ, Williams C (2015) ESCMID guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections 2014. Clin Microbiol Infect 21(Suppl 1):S1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2014.10.024CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kampf G (2016) Acquired resistance to chlorhexidine – is it time to establish an “antiseptic stewardship” initiative? J Hosp Infect 94(3):213–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kampf G (2017) Hautantiseptik - neue Erkenntnisse und Empfehlungen. Krankenhaushygiene Up2date 12(2):143–155Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kampf G, Kramer A (2004) Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs. Clin Microbiol Rev 17(4):863–893CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    KRINKO am Robert Koch Institut (2017) Prävention von Infektionen, die von Gefäßkathetern ausgehen. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 60(2):171–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    KRINKO am Robert Koch Institut (2018) Prävention postoperativer Wundinfektionen. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 61(4):448–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lachapelle JM (2014) A comparison of the irritant and allergenic properties of antiseptics. Eur J Dermatol: Ejd 24(1):3–9.  https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2013.2198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lutz JT, Diener IV, Freiberg K, Zillmann R, Shah-Hosseini K, Seifert H, Berger-Schreck B, Wisplinghoff H (2016) Efficacy of two antiseptic regimens on skin colonization of insertion sites for two different catheter types: a randomized, clinical trial. Infection 44(6):707–712.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-016-0899-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maiwald M, Widmer AF (2017) WHO’s recommendation for surgical skin antisepsis is premature. Lancet Infect Dis 17(10):1023–1024.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30448-6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Melichercikova V, Urban J, Goroncy-Bermes P (2010) Residual effect of antiseptic substances on human skin. J Hosp Infect 75(3):238–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2009.12.010CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mimoz O, Lucet JC, Kerforne T, Pascal J, Souweine B, Goudet V, Mercat A, Bouadma L, Lasocki S, Alfandari S, Friggeri A, Wallet F, Allou N, Ruckly S, Balayn D, Lepape A, Timsit JF (2015) Skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol, with and without skin scrubbing, for prevention of intravascular-catheter-related infection (CLEAN): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, two-by-two factorial trial. Lancet 386(10008):2069–2077.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00244-5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ngai IM, Van Arsdale A, Govindappagari S, Judge NE, Neto NK, Bernstein J, Bernstein PS, Garry DJ (2015) Skin preparation for prevention of surgical site infection after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 126(6):1251–1257.  https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000001118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, Lipsett PA, Masur H, Mermel LA, Pearson ML, Raad, II, Randolph AG, Rupp ME, Saint S (2011) Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Am J Infect Control 39(4 Suppl 1):S1–S34. doi:S0196-6553(11)00085-X [pii].  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2011.01.003 [doi]
  22. 22.
    Rochon-Edouard S, Pons JL, Veber B, Larkin M, Vassal S, Lemeland JF (2004) Comparative in vitro and in vivo study of nine alcohol-based handrubs. Am J Infect Control 32(4):200–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2003.08.003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rosas-Ledesma P, Mariscal A, Carnero M, Munoz-Bravo C, Gomez-Aracena J, Aguilar L, Granizo JJ, Lafuente A, Fernandez-Crehuet J (2009) Antimicrobial efficacy in vivo of a new formulation of 2-butanone peroxide in n-propanol: comparison with commercial products in a cross-over trial. J Hosp Infect 71(3):223–227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2008.11.007CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tuuli MG, Liu J, Stout MJ, Martin S, Cahill AG, Odibo AO, Colditz GA, Macones GA (2016) A randomized trial comparing skin antiseptic agents at cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 374(7):647–655.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1511048CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    WHO (2016) Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infections. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Hygiene and Environmental MedicineUniversity of GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany

Personalised recommendations