Future Directions in Clinical Research Informatics

  • Peter J. EmbiEmail author
Part of the Health Informatics book series (HI)


Given the rapid advances in biomedical science, the growth of the human population, and the escalating costs of health care, the need to accelerate the pace of biomedical discoveries and their translation into health-care practice will continue to grow. Indeed, the need for more efficient and effective support of clinical research to enable the development, evaluation, and implementation of cost-effective therapies is more important now than ever before. Furthermore, the fundamentally information-intensive nature of such clinical research endeavors and the growth in both health technology adoption and health-related data available for interventions and analytics beg for the solutions offered by CRI. As a result, the demand for informatics professionals who focus on the increasingly important field of clinical and translational research will increase. Despite the progress made to date, new models, tools, and approaches will be needed to fully leverage and mine these digital assets and improve CRI practice, and this innovation will continue to drive the field forward in the coming years.


Clinical research informatics Biomedical informatics Translation research Electronic health records Future trends US policy initiatives Health IT infrastructure Data analytics Learning health systems Evidence-generating medicine 


  1. 1.
    Embi PJ, Payne PR. Clinical research informatics: challenges, opportunities and definition for an emerging domain. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(3):316–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zerhouni EA. Translational and clinical science – time for a new vision. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(15):1621–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zerhouni EA. Clinical research at a crossroads: the NIH roadmap. J Investig Med. 2006;54(4):171–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    NCATS. CTSA Trial Innovation Network.
  5. 5.
    Bourne PE, Bonazzi V, Dunn M, Green ED, Guyer M, Komatsoulis G, Larkin J, Russell B. The NIH big data to knowledge (BD2K) initiative. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015;22(6):1114. No abstract available.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Oster S, Langella S, Hastings S, et al. caGrid 1.0: an enterprise grid infrastructure for biomedical research. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(2):138–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saltz J, Oster S, Hastings S, et al. caGrid: design and implementation of the core architecture of the cancer biomedical informatics grid. Bioinformatics. 2006;22(15):1910–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Niland JC, Townsend RM, Annechiarico R, Johnson K, Beck JR, Manion FJ, Hutchinson F, Robbins RJ, Chute CG, Vogel LH, Saltz JH, Watson MA, Casavant TL, Soong SJ, Bondy J, Fenstermacher DA, Becich MJ, Casagrande JT, Tuck DP. The cancer biomedical informatics grid (caBIG): infrastructure and applications for a worldwide research community. Fortschr Med. 2007;12(Pt 1):330–4. PMID: 17911733.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kakazu KK, Cheung LW, Lynne W. The cancer biomedical informatics grid (caBIG): pioneering an expansive network of information and tools for collaborative cancer research. Hawaii Med J. 2004;63(9):273–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Holve E, Segal C, Lopez MH, Rein A, Johnson BH. The electronic data methods (EDM) forum for comparative effectiveness research (CER). Med Care. 2012;50(Suppl):S7–10. Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fleurence RL, Curtis LH, Califf RM, Platt R, Selby JV, Brown JS. Launching PCORnet, a national patient-centered clinical research network. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(4):578–82. Epub 2014 May 12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    PCORnet PPRN Consortium, Daugherty SE, Wahba S, Fleurence R. Patient-powered research networks: building capacity for conducting patient-centered clinical outcomes research. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(4):583–6. Epub 2014 May 12.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Califf RM. The patient-centered outcomes research network: a national infrastructure for comparative effectiveness research. N C Med J. 2014;75(3):204–10. Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hripcsak G, Duke JD, Shah NH, Reich CG, Huser V, Schuemie MJ, Suchard MA, Park RW, Wong IC, Rijnbeek PR, van der Lei J, Pratt N, Norén GN, Li YC, Stang PE, Madigan D, Ryan PB. Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI): opportunities for observational researchers. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:574–8. PMID:26262116.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Klann JG, Abend A, Raghavan VA, Mandl KD, Murphy SN. Data interchange using i2b2. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23(5):909–15. Epub 2016 Feb 5. PMID: 26911824.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Friedman CP, Wong AK, Blumenthal D. Achieving a nationwide learning health system. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(57):57cm29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Embi PJ, Payne PR. Evidence generating medicine: redefining the research-practice relationship to complete the evidence cycle. Med Care. 2013;51(8 Suppl 3):S87–91. PMID: 23793052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Payne PR, Embi PJ, Niland J. Foundational biomedical informatics research in the clinical and translational science era: a call to action. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17(6):615–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Richesson RL, Green BB, Laws R, Puro J, Kahn MG, Bauck A, Smerek M, Van Eaton EG, Zozus M, Hammond WE, Stephens KA, Simon GE. Pragmatic (trial) informatics: a perspective from the NIH health care systems research collaboratory. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24(5):996–1001. Scholar
  23. 23.
    Embi PJ, Kaufman SE, Payne PRO. Biomedical informatics and outcomes research. Circulation. 2009;120:2393–9., Originally published December 7, 2009. Scholar
  24. 24.
    Payne PR, Johnson SB, Starren JB, Tilson HH, Dowdy D. Breaking the translational barriers: the value of integrating biomedical informatics and translational research. J Investig Med. 2005;53(4):192–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sung NS, Crowley WF Jr, Genel M, et al. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA. 2003;289(10):1278–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chung TK, Kukafka R, Johnson SB. Reengineering clinical research with informatics. J Investig Med. 2006;54(6):327–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sanchez-Pinto LN1, Mosa ASM, Fultz-Hollis K, Tachinardi U, Barnett WK, Embi PJ. The emerging role of the chief research informatics officer in academic health centers. Appl Clin Inform. 2017;8(3):845–53. Scholar
  28. 28.
    Embi PJ, Payne PR. Advancing methodologies in clinical research informatics (CRI): foundational work for a maturing field. J Biomed Inform. 2014;52:1–3. No abstract available.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Payne PRO, Embi PJ, editors. Translational informatics: realizing the promise of knowledge-driven healthcare. London: Springer; 2014.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    The Ohio State University-AMIA 10x10 program in Clinical Research Informatics. Accessed 14 Jul 2011.
  31. 31.
    Knosp BM, Barnett W, Embi PJ, Anderson N. Maturity models for research IT and Informatics reports from the field. In:Proceedings of the AMIA summit on clinical research informatics; 2017. p. 18–20. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Regenstrief Institute, Inc, and Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations