Advertisement

Religion and Attitudes Towards Abortion and Euthanasia Among Young People in Poland and Norway

  • Pål Ketil BotvarEmail author
  • Claudia Sarti
  • Katarzyna Zielińska
  • Marcin K. Zwierżdżyński
Chapter
Part of the Religion and Human Rights book series (REHU, volume 4)

Abstract

This article compares attitudes towards abortion and euthanasia in two countries with different Christian traditions. Poland is a former communist country with a strong Catholic tradition. Norway is a highly secularized Scandinavian country with a dominating Lutheran Church. The two countries have different legal frameworks regarding abortion and euthanasia. We aim here to investigate the connection between religion and attitudes towards abortion and euthanasia. Our methodological approach is “most different systems design”. If one finds similar patterns in countries with different religious and political cultures, there is reason to believe that the findings will also apply to other countries. Though the two countries differ with respect to political and religious culture, we find interesting similarities between them. In both countries, religiosity has a negative impact on attitudes towards abortion and euthanasia; this means that the most religious people also have the most negative attitudes regarding these issues. Views regarding the role religion should perform in society are also strong predictors of attitudes. In both countries, those who think that church and religion should actively influence society have negative attitudes towards abortion and euthanasia while those who think church and religion should adapt to trends in society support both abortion and euthanasia as a right.

Keywords

Human rights Abortion Euthanasia Protestant Catholic Role of religion Religiosity Poland Norway Youth 

References

  1. Anckar, C. (2008). On the applicability of the most similar systems design and the most different systems design in comparative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11, 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnard, C. (1985). Good life, good death: Doctor’s case for Euthanasia suicide. London: Peter Owen Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, P. (1967). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  4. Boguszewski, R. (2012). Zmiany w zakresie wiary i religijności Polaków po śmierci Jana Pawła II. BS/49/2012. Aktualne problemy i wydarzenia. Warszawa: CBOS. http://www.naukairozwoj.uksw.edu.pl/sites/default/files/Nag%C3%B3rska.pdf
  5. Boguszewski, R. (2014). Religijność a zasady moralne. 15/2014. Aktualne problemy i wydarzenia. Warszawa: CBOS. http://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2014/K_015_14.PDF
  6. Boguszewski, R. (2015). Zmiany w zakresie podstawowych wskaźników religijności Polaków po śmierci Jana Pawła II. 26/2015. Warszawa: CBOS. http://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2015/K_026_15.PDF
  7. Borowik, I. (2002). The Roman Catholic Church in the process of democratic transformation: The case of Poland. Social Compass, 49(2), 239–252.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768602049002008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casanova, J. (2003). What is a public religion? In H. Heclo & W. M. McClay (Eds.), Religion returns to the public square (pp. 111–141). Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
  10. Habermas, J. (2008). Notes on post-secular society. New Perspectives Quarterly, 25(4), 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Herbert, D., & Fras, M. (2009). European enlargement, secularisation and religious re-publicisation in central and Eastern Europe. Religion, State and Society, 37(1–2), 81–97.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09637490802693668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions, 3, 710–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jankowska, H. (1991, Autumn). Church and politics in Poland. Feminist Review, 39, 174–181. Shifting Territories: Feminism & Europe.Google Scholar
  14. Minkenberg, M. (2003). The policy impact of Church-State relations: Family policy and abortion in Britain, France, and Germany. West European Politics, 26(1), 195–217.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380412331300267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pacian, A. J., & Kulik, T. B. (2011). Practicing Euthanasia in Poland – Necessity or freedom of introducing and application of legal regulations? – Discussion on the legal matters. Romanian Journal of Bioethics, 9(4), 74–84.Google Scholar
  17. Ramet, S. P. (2007). The liberal project and the transformation of democracy: The case of East Central Europe. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Rawls, J. (1997). The idea of public reason revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review, 64(3), 765.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1600311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(1), 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shala, I., & Gusha, K. (2016). The debate over Euthanasia and human rights. European Scientific Journal, 12(8), 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Śliwka, M., & Gałęska-Śliwka, A. (2011). Regulating end-of-life decisions in Poland: Legal Dilemmas. Advances in Palliative Medicine, 10, 49–56.Google Scholar
  22. Szeroczyńska, M. (2004). Eutanazja i wspomagane samobójstwo na świecie. In Studium prawnoporównawcze. Kraków: Universitas.Google Scholar
  23. Weber, M. (2011/1904). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Weithman, P. J. (2002). Religion and the obligations of citizenship. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wolterstorff, N. (1997). The role of religion in decision and discussion of political issues. In R. Audi & Wolterstorff (Eds.), Religion in the public square: The place of religious convictions in political debate (pp. 67–120). Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  26. Zielińska, K. (2015). The Roman Catholic Church and human rights in Poland. In H.-G. Ziebertz & G. Črpić (Eds.), Religion and human rights (pp. 137–149). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Zielińska, K., & Zwierżdżyński, M. K. (2013). Religious education in Poland. In D. H. Davis & E. Miroshnikova (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of religious education (pp. 264–271). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Zubrzycki, G. (2006). The crosses of Auschwitz: Nationalism and religion in post-communist Poland. New ed. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pål Ketil Botvar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Claudia Sarti
    • 2
  • Katarzyna Zielińska
    • 3
  • Marcin K. Zwierżdżyński
    • 4
  1. 1.KIFO Institute for Church, Religion, and Worldview ResearchOsloNorway
  2. 2.Independent ResearcherNijmeganThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Jagiellonian UniversityKrakówPoland
  4. 4.AGH University of Science and TechnologyKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations