Advertisement

Part I Commentary 4: Turning to Temporality in Research on Spatial Reasoning

  • Nathalie Sinclair
Chapter
Part of the Research in Mathematics Education book series (RME)

Abstract

This commentary explores ways in which cognitive psychologists and mathematics educators could jointly contribute to better understanding the temporal dimension of spatial reasoning, where temporality refers primarily to the movement of mathematical objects and relations.

References

  1. Abrahamson, D., Shayan, S., Bakker, A., & van der Schaaf, M. (2016). Eye-tracking Piaget: Capturing the emergence of attentional anchors in the coordination of proportional motor action. Human Development, 58(4–5), 218–244.Google Scholar
  2. Atit, K., Shipley, T. F., & Tikoff, B. (2013). Twisting space: Are rigid and non-rigid mental transformations separate spatial skills? Cognitive Processing, 14(2), 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Battista, M. T. (2002). Learning geometry in a dynamic computer environment. Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(1), 333–339.Google Scholar
  4. Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 843–908). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  5. Coles, A., & Sinclair, N. (2017). Re-thinking place value: From metaphor to metonym. For the Learning of Mathematics, 37(1), 3–8.Google Scholar
  6. Henderson, D., & Taimina, D. (2005). Experiencing geometry. Euclidean and non-Euclidean with history. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
  7. Kaur, H. (2017). Young children’s understanding of angle in a dynamic geometry environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  8. Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics come from: How embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Newcombe, N., & Shipley, T. F. (2012). Thinking about spatial thinking: New typology, new assessments. In J. S. Gero (Ed.), Studying visual and spatial reasoning for design creativity. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Núñez, R. (2006). Do real numbers really move? Language, thought, and gesture: The embodied cognitive foundations of mathematics. In R. Hersh (Ed.), 18 unconventional essays on the nature of mathematics (pp. 160–181). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Núñez, R., & Cooperrider, K. (2013). The tangle of time and space in human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(5), 220–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sinclair, N., & Gol Tabaghi, S. (2010). Drawing space: Mathematicians’ kinetic conceptions of eigenvectors. Education Studies in Mathematics, 74(3), 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Whiteley, W. (2002). Teaching to see like a mathematician. Retrieved from http://www.math.yorku.ca/~whiteley/Teaching_to_see.pdf.
  15. Zalamea, F. (2012). Synthetic philosophy of contemporary mathematics. New York: Sequence Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations